The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Life Sciences
  3. Physiology & Medicine
  4. COVID-19
  5. A concern that Imperial College's disease model is 13 years old?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

A concern that Imperial College's disease model is 13 years old?

  • 6 Replies
  • 5903 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline marty (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 3
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
A concern that Imperial College's disease model is 13 years old?
« on: 23/03/2020 22:51:12 »
I listened to the ‘COVID-19: Will lock-down work?’ Radio NZ podcast with Chris Smith.  The interviewer, Kim Hill refers to the Imperial College disease modelling study by Neil Ferguson which has been highly influential in changing government approach to the disease.

However, in a series of tweets today, Neil reveals the background - “I wrote the code (thousands of lines of undocumented C) 13+ years ago to model flu pandemics…”

One of the replies on Twitter says:

“So many concerns.

Modelled on a flu pandemic.
13 years old.
C.
Thousands of lines of code.”

Are they right to be concerned?
« Last Edit: 24/03/2020 12:22:38 by chris »
Logged
 



Offline set fair

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 467
  • Activity:
    1.5%
  • Thanked: 19 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: A concern that Imperial College's disease model is 13 years old?
« Reply #1 on: 23/03/2020 23:48:54 »
What has changed in 13 years? +ve It has probably been test for example with ebola, -ve less hospital beds. I doubt it took account of people widely ignoring social distancing. It should have been published. My concern would be how degenerate the model is.
Logged
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21136
  • Activity:
    68.5%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: A concern that Imperial College's disease model is 13 years old?
« Reply #2 on: 24/03/2020 00:00:42 »
Yes.

The general form of a pandemic is well known from previous experience of human and animal pandemics. The particular progress of a new one depends on a whole lot of unknowns such as public response to instruction (stay at home or buy toilet paper?), infectivity, mobility of asymptomatic carriers, symptomless incubation period, mobility of symptomatic carriers, lethality of disease, distribution of treatment facilities, availability of preventive interventions,.....none of which is known with sufficient accuracy to make optimal decisions until its effect is already obvious.  So the only sensible decision is potential overreaction.

Best summary I've heard was from an American epidemiologist who said "If, when it's all over, people say 'what was all the fuss about?', we will have got it right". 
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    13.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: A concern that Imperial College's disease model is 13 years old?
« Reply #3 on: 24/03/2020 08:40:14 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 24/03/2020 00:00:42
Best summary I've heard was from an American epidemiologist who said "If, when it's all over, people say 'what was all the fuss about?', we will have got it right". 

Just like Y2K
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline marty (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 3
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: A concern that Imperial College's disease model is 13 years old?
« Reply #4 on: 05/05/2020 22:13:52 »
Edit: Should we be concerned that 'SAGE' means: wise, especially as a result of great experience?
Logged
 



Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    13.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: A concern that Imperial College's disease model is 13 years old?
« Reply #5 on: 06/05/2020 10:22:55 »
I don't know how old the idea of counting is, but I'm more concerned that my government can't count tests than about a 13 year old mathematical model.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline marty (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 3
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: A concern that Imperial College's disease model is 13 years old?
« Reply #6 on: 06/05/2020 13:39:43 »
Agreed and app plans.

On Twitter: /FryRsquared/status/1257397805003538437
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.2 seconds with 42 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.