The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. General Discussion & Feedback
  3. Just Chat!
  4. why would a scientist accept the bible
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 ... 22 23 [24] 25 26 ... 33   Go Down

why would a scientist accept the bible

  • 649 Replies
  • 163508 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 9 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    11%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: why would a scientist accept the bible
« Reply #460 on: 25/04/2020 12:52:00 »
Quote from: duffyd on 25/04/2020 12:43:57
Combine this evidence
It's not evidence, it's hearsay.

You seem reluctant to even try to recognise that "someone told me a story" is not evidence.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



Offline duffyd

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 735
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: why would a scientist accept the bible
« Reply #461 on: 25/04/2020 15:10:59 »
Quote from: duffyd on 20/04/2020 07:38:45
Quote from: alancalverd on 17/04/2020 15:38:06
It's the "interpretation" bit that invokes contempt. A famous objection to university courses in English literature was "so much bad English has been written about good English". Much the same with Christianity.

How much would you pay for a bowdlerised sketch of a third-hand copy of a painting by an unknown artist of an event that he did not witness? Not a lot, I suspect. So why write pages of nonsense about a wholly unjustified interpretation of an edited collection of quasi-historical and bizarrely mystical texts?

At face value the bible contains some interesting snippets of the history and poetry of the Jews up to about 2000 years ago, with possibly too much emphasis (much of it tediously repeated and over-embellished) about Rabbi Jesus of Nazareth. There's plenty more, some in the Dead Sea Scrolls and more recently in the Encyclopaedia Judaica. 

Little point in anyone else reading it as we don't accept converts easily, nor do we require a detailed knowledge of it - just a broad understanding of the underlying philosophy and acceptance of the rules of behavior. And don't kneel.   

Joseph Klausner wrote, “It is universally admitted … that Christ taught the purest and sublimest ethics." He wrote, "Jesus of Nazareth: His Life, Times & Teaching." Highly regarded.

"Since the beginning of my philosophical life I have followed the policy of Plato's Socrates: We must follow the argument wherever it leads."
In late 2006, Flew joined 11 other academics in urging the British government to teach intelligent design in the state schools.
In 2007, in an interview with Benjamin Wiker, Flew said again that his deism was the result of his "growing empathy with the insight of Einstein and other noted scientists that there had to be an Intelligence behind the integrated complexity of the physical Universe" and "my own insight that the integrated complexity of life itself – which is far more complex than the physical Universe – can only be explained in terms of an Intelligent Source." wikipedia

Flew concluded, "A super-intelligence is the only good explanation for the origin of life and the complexity of nature."

"that there had to be an Intelligence behind the integrated complexity of the physical Universe" FLEW

Sometimes the most outspoken atheists come to understand that life itself is too incredible for there not to be a creator. It is a terrific beginning, but just that. Upon deeper investigation, as CS Lewis discovered, (and hundreds of millions of others) GOD not only is, HE is found in the person of JESUS CHRIST. 

Once again, Alan's silly comments reveal how little he and those like him understand the reality of JESUS.
« Last Edit: 25/04/2020 15:15:08 by duffyd »
Logged
 

Offline duffyd

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 735
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: why would a scientist accept the bible
« Reply #462 on: 25/04/2020 15:16:28 »
“The depravity of man is at once the most empirically verifiable reality but at the same time the most intellectually resisted fact.”
Logged
 

Offline duffyd

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 735
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: why would a scientist accept the bible
« Reply #463 on: 25/04/2020 15:18:23 »
Quote from: duffyd on 25/04/2020 15:16:28
“The depravity of man is at once the most empirically verifiable reality but at the same time the most intellectually resisted fact.”

“I myself am convinced that the theory of evolution, especially to the extent to which it has been applied, will be one of the greatest jokes in the history books of the future. Posterity will marvel that so very flimsy and dubious an hypothesis could be accepted with the incredible credulity it has.” Muggeridge is more than a genius
Logged
 

Offline duffyd

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 735
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: why would a scientist accept the bible
« Reply #464 on: 25/04/2020 15:20:58 »
Quote from: duffyd on 25/04/2020 15:18:23
Quote from: duffyd on 25/04/2020 15:16:28
“The depravity of man is at once the most empirically verifiable reality but at the same time the most intellectually resisted fact.”

“I myself am convinced that the theory of evolution, especially to the extent to which it has been applied, will be one of the greatest jokes in the history books of the future. Posterity will marvel that so very flimsy and dubious an hypothesis could be accepted with the incredible credulity it has.” Muggeridge is more than a genius

“The orgasm has replaced the Cross as the focus of longing and the image of fulfillment.” Malcolm M. Who else? He had a way of nailing the truth.
Logged
 



Offline duffyd

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 735
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: why would a scientist accept the bible
« Reply #465 on: 25/04/2020 15:26:39 »
Quote from: duffyd on 25/04/2020 15:20:58
Quote from: duffyd on 25/04/2020 15:18:23
Quote from: duffyd on 25/04/2020 15:16:28
“The depravity of man is at once the most empirically verifiable reality but at the same time the most intellectually resisted fact.”

“I myself am convinced that the theory of evolution, especially to the extent to which it has been applied, will be one of the greatest jokes in the history books of the future. Posterity will marvel that so very flimsy and dubious an hypothesis could be accepted with the incredible credulity it has.” Muggeridge is more than a genius

“The orgasm has replaced the Cross as the focus of longing and the image of fulfillment.” Malcolm M. Who else? He had a way of nailing the truth.

[Pascal] was the first and perhaps is still the most effective voice to be raised in warning of the consequences of the enthronement of the human ego in contradistinction to the cross, symbolizing the ego's immolation. How beautiful it all seemed at the time of the Enlightenment, that man triumphant would bring to pass that earthly paradise whose groves of academe would ensure the realization forever of peace, plenty, and beatitude in practice. But what a nightmare of wars, famines, and folly was to result therefrom.” (The End of Christendom)

I don't know about same sex marriage anymore. I used to be convinced. Now, after reading and becoming familiar with Pascal and Malcolm,
 including the movie M produced on Mother Teresa, I'm pretty sure if they were still alive, I would marry the guys.
« Last Edit: 26/04/2020 10:47:38 by duffyd »
Logged
 

Offline duffyd

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 735
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: why would a scientist accept the bible
« Reply #466 on: 25/04/2020 15:29:49 »
People do not believe lies because they have to but because they want to. Muggeridge
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    11%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: why would a scientist accept the bible
« Reply #467 on: 25/04/2020 16:23:02 »
Quote from: duffyd on 25/04/2020 15:29:49
People do not believe lies because they have to but because they want to.
Yes.
I think I already made that point.
* comforting lie.png (351.74 kB . 603x448 - viewed 2764 times)

Religion tells comforting lies.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    11%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: why would a scientist accept the bible
« Reply #468 on: 25/04/2020 16:23:57 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 25/04/2020 12:52:00
You seem reluctant to even try to recognise that "someone told me a story" is not evidence.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    11%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: why would a scientist accept the bible
« Reply #469 on: 25/04/2020 16:26:22 »
Quote from: duffyd on 25/04/2020 15:16:28
“The depravity of man is at once the most empirically verifiable reality but at the same time the most intellectually resisted fact.”
If that's true then it's proof that , if there's a designer, He's incompetent.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    11%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: why would a scientist accept the bible
« Reply #470 on: 25/04/2020 16:29:33 »
Quote from: duffyd on 25/04/2020 15:20:58
“The orgasm has replaced the Cross as the focus of longing and the image of fulfillment.” Malcolm M. Who else? He had a way of nailing the truth.
OK, one is emblematic of the only real continuation of life after death.
The other is an instrument of torture.

Which do you feel we should worship?

"He had a way of nailing the truth."
His nails did to the truth what Christ's nails did to him.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21159
  • Activity:
    69.5%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: why would a scientist accept the bible
« Reply #471 on: 25/04/2020 23:30:14 »
The Second Coming actually took place about 100 years ago. Jesus materialised before the Pope and asked about the state of religion on earth. The Pope showed him his crucifix and said "There are billions like this". Jesus said "If they are still using that bloody thing, I'm wasting my time."  He was never seen again, nor ever will be, by people who revere instruments of torture and execution.
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline duffyd

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 735
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: why would a scientist accept the bible
« Reply #472 on: 26/04/2020 00:45:45 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 25/04/2020 23:30:14
The Second Coming actually took place about 100 years ago. Jesus materialised before the Pope and asked about the state of religion on earth. The Pope showed him his crucifix and said "There are billions like this". Jesus said "If they are still using that bloody thing, I'm wasting my time."  He was never seen again, nor ever will be, by people who revere instruments of torture and execution.

Have you considered coming up with something new, something creative, something that hasn't been used since the first century? Drinking blood is kind of old, don't you think? And, you still can't get your dates straight. My, my, my Sweet Old Al, you still have no idea, do you? Remember all those verses you quoted out of context? Why bother if the N.T. is as hodgepodge as you say? See your dilemma? You can't erase the N.T. and its unparalleled impact, and you won't surrender to its unique claim on your life. Tough place to be, old boy. You're stuck. Hiding from what you know is true cripples your intellect and everything else about you. You can't move forward, but sliding back into insignificance inevitably grates on your consciousness. 
You are not alone. You have come face-to-face with you and you have nowhere to go, except to HIM. Many a tortured soul has confronted the same problem. Honesty is the way through. Admitting the truth is the pits, but it's the path to freedom. "LORD GOD, if it's true, if YOU really are GOD, if YOU really exist, show me! Please! I'm begging YOU."

Use the science of psychology. What keeps you stuck? "Behold I stand at the door and knock. If any man hears my voice and opens the door, I will come into him and dine with him, and he with ME."
Logged
 



Offline duffyd

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 735
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: why would a scientist accept the bible
« Reply #473 on: 26/04/2020 00:54:17 »
Resisting GOD is a form of hell. It's a miserable place to be. Striving against HIS will produces nothing but anger, anxiety, ill will, restlessness, torment and futility. Surrender, as unpleasant as it can seem, is the answer. Many famous, respected, popular, hard working, well meaning folks have found HIM to be true. Many more desperate, down-and-out people on the fringe of society shout the same findings in HIM.
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    11%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: why would a scientist accept the bible
« Reply #474 on: 26/04/2020 09:22:15 »
Quote from: duffyd on 26/04/2020 00:45:45
Have you considered coming up with something new, something creative, something that hasn't been used since the first century?
WHy?
The facts that were put forward in the first century are still facts today.
The God squad has yet to counter them successfully.

They just lie about it and pretend that they have proof of God.

It's like a 3 year old who tells you that he knows a secret- but he's not going to tell you what it is.

Quote from: duffyd on 26/04/2020 00:54:17
Resisting GOD is a form of hell. It's a miserable place to be.
No, it's not.
And I get to have a lie-in on Sunday morning.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline duffyd

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 735
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: why would a scientist accept the bible
« Reply #475 on: 26/04/2020 10:49:38 »
Quote from: duffyd on 25/04/2020 15:29:49
People do not believe lies because they have to but because they want to. Muggeridge
That little golden nugget of truth is proven true by the myriad false statements enjoyed so well by those who refuse to accept science.
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    11%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: why would a scientist accept the bible
« Reply #476 on: 26/04/2020 11:00:37 »
Quote from: duffyd on 26/04/2020 10:49:38
Quote from: duffyd on 25/04/2020 15:29:49
People do not believe lies because they have to but because they want to. Muggeridge
That little golden nugget of truth is proven true by the myriad false statements enjoyed so well by those who refuse to accept science.
No.
The scientists don't believe lies, they believe evidence. That's the point.

However followers of most religions must be believing lies.
Because the different religions can not all be right.
So their believers must be believing lies.
And they do it because it's a comforting lie.

Muggeridge's statement shows why you should not put any trust in those who claim "It will be OK; God will look after you", because that's the ultimate example of what people want to believe.

Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



Offline duffyd

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 735
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: why would a scientist accept the bible
« Reply #477 on: 26/04/2020 11:03:33 »
Quote from: duffyd on 26/04/2020 00:54:17
Resisting GOD is a form of hell. It's a miserable place to be. Striving against HIS will produces nothing but anger, anxiety, ill will, restlessness, torment and futility. Surrender, as unpleasant as it can seem, is the answer. Many famous, respected, popular, hard working, well meaning folks have found HIM to be true. Many more desperate, down-and-out people on the fringe of society shout the same findings in HIM.

The proof of that declaration is splattered all over these pages. The bitterness, the stench of false pride, the pure silliness of Alan's attempts at discarding the facts (200 and 300 years, HE was a nice guy, etc.) don't fool anyone, even though he is convinced otherwise. Just like the drunk who knows there is a heaven because, as he points to his gut, he says, I've got hell right here. It is easy to appreciate the suffering he tries to conceal. That's the best he knows to do, but it is blatant. All the while people from every conceivable background raise their voices in one perfectly harmonized, blasting cheer, "HE IS RISEN."
« Last Edit: 26/04/2020 12:02:32 by duffyd »
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    11%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: why would a scientist accept the bible
« Reply #478 on: 26/04/2020 11:10:37 »
Quote from: duffyd on 26/04/2020 11:03:33
Quote from: duffyd on 26/04/2020 00:54:17
Resisting GOD is a form of hell. It's a miserable place to be. Striving against HIS will produces nothing but anger, anxiety, ill will, restlessness, torment and futility. Surrender, as unpleasant as it can seem, is the answer. Many famous, respected, popular, hard working, well meaning folks have found HIM to be true. Many more desperate, down-and-out people on the fringe of society shout the same findings in HIM.

The proof of that declaration is splattered all over these pages. The bitterness, the stench of false pride, the pure silliness of Alan's attempts at discarding the facts (200 and 300 years, HE was a nice guy, etc.) don't fool anyone, even though he is convinced otherwise. Just like the drunk who says he knows there is a heaven because, as he points to his gut, he says, I've got hell right here. It is easy to appreciate the suffering he tries to conceal. That's the best he knows to do, but it is blatant. All the while people from every conceivable background raise their voices in one perfectly harmonized, blasting cheer, "HE IS RISEN."
Can you explain, in scientific terms, how we would distinguish between that post of yours and the views of someone suffering from some sort of delusions?
I ask, because as far as I can tell it looks like mad ramblings.
In particular you witter on about what other people think, without having found out what they actually think.

Have a look at some of the non- religious arguments going on here. They are very similar in many ways. The language, for example, is hard to distinguish.
So your view that there's something special about our objection to your irrational  jabber is mistaken.
We take the same approach to others who flouth logic and reality.

Have a look here, for example.
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=79004.0
or here
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=79405.0
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline duffyd

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 735
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: why would a scientist accept the bible
« Reply #479 on: 26/04/2020 11:11:32 »
Hundreds of millions of human beings across time and space in unison declaring the glory in/of JESUS CHRIST is overwhelming evidence that indeed HE rose from the grave. Scientists know this. It is perfectly clear. They must kick against the pricks to deny it and we know what happens to the most virulent among them.
Scientists conducting double blind, controlled studies don't yield such results, nothing close.
« Last Edit: 27/04/2020 08:09:28 by duffyd »
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 ... 22 23 [24] 25 26 ... 33   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 1.544 seconds with 67 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.