0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
protophoton
Quote from: talanum1 on 29/04/2020 12:30:28protophoton Your making up new particles now?
They must exist otherwise there is no mechanism for a photon to reach lightspeed.
Your making up new particles now?
Well, the implication of what you say is that gammas are the same as electrons.
Quote from: Bobolink on 29/04/2020 15:57:36Your making up new particles now?With the made up particle I can explain how an emitted photon reaches light speed in classical physical terms. Or how it appears to be generated at light speed.Quote from: Bored chemist on 29/04/2020 13:37:12Well, the implication of what you say is that gammas are the same as electrons.Why does it imply that?
Why does it imply that?
With the made up particle I can explain how an emitted photon reaches light speed in classical physical terms. Or how it appears to be generated at light speed.
Since you claim the "structure" is conserved, a photon and an electron must have the same structure.
Maxwell explained that a hundred years and more ago. Without needing your imaginary particle.
Maxwell does not give a step by step explanation of this.
I don't know how to be modest about this.
(totally picturable in my model)
Quote from: Bored chemist on 29/04/2020 17:48:21Since you claim the "structure" is conserved, a photon and an electron must have the same structure.I claim that the positron has anti-structure (totally picturable in my model), so positron-electron annihilation has a sum over structures that cancels. I don't know how to be modest about this.Quote from: Bored chemist on 29/04/2020 17:48:21Maxwell explained that a hundred years and more ago. Without needing your imaginary particle.Maxwell states that a photon start out at light speed. But the particle it came from must have gone slower than light. So exactly what happens at the moment the particle emits a photon? Maxwell does not give a step by step explanation of this.
You somehow think that, in the century or so since he published his work, nobody noticed this omission, rather than, for example, thinking that there is an explanation, but you didn't understand it?
Draw us a picture.
If you did learn even a little physics you would look back on these posts and be so embarrassed.
Did it occur to you to come up with a picture that makes sense?
Rather, a photon is already traveling at light speed c when it is created
Rather, a photon is always traveling at c, from the moment of its creation
just tried to use the code that space understands,
That's why I invented the protophoton that becomes a photon.
Photons only exist at C. They don't need a "protophoton".
And, when your idea predicts something silly like a continuously increasing speed of light, it's time to ditch it.
Since a photon has no inertia, one needs a constant force on it to keep it moving at the speed of light.
Rubbish