The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Life Sciences
  3. Physiology & Medicine
  4. COVID-19
  5. How much are the cheapest reliable tests?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

How much are the cheapest reliable tests?

  • 2 Replies
  • 1974 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline set fair (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 467
  • Activity:
    1.5%
  • Thanked: 19 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
How much are the cheapest reliable tests?
« on: 17/04/2020 21:06:33 »
I've heard $5 from India and even claims of $1. Should we be going all out to make 10 million tests per day? Than everyone in the UK can be tested once a week, positives to be put into quarantine, household member into isolation. How long before we could go back to work?
Logged
 



Offline vhfpmr

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 722
  • Activity:
    5%
  • Thanked: 75 times
Re: How much are the cheapest reliable tests?
« Reply #1 on: 18/04/2020 00:14:38 »
It would depend what you mean by reliable, I suppose. Whatever gold standard is being used to evaluate all the others probably costs megabucks.
Logged
 

Offline set fair (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 467
  • Activity:
    1.5%
  • Thanked: 19 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: How much are the cheapest reliable tests?
« Reply #2 on: 19/04/2020 04:26:47 »
I don't think we need a gold standard, just the same reliability as the tests we are using now.

The sums: GDP £40 billion a week, if we are are only loosing 10% of that with the lockdown that's £4 billion. Seems like a no brainer and we'd be saving all those lives.

I know it would take time to increase test production, so we should start now.

Still waiting for sombody to say why it wouldn't work.
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.146 seconds with 29 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.