The Naked Scientists
Toggle navigation
Login
Register
Podcasts
The Naked Scientists
eLife
Naked Genetics
Naked Astronomy
In short
Naked Neuroscience
Ask! The Naked Scientists
Question of the Week
Archive
Video
SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
Articles
Science News
Features
Interviews
Answers to Science Questions
Get Naked
Donate
Do an Experiment
Science Forum
Ask a Question
About
Meet the team
Our Sponsors
Site Map
Contact us
User menu
Login
Register
Search
Home
Help
Search
Tags
Recent Topics
Login
Register
Naked Science Forum
Life Sciences
Physiology & Medicine
COVID-19
Is it time to ban "Gain of Function" testing?
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Is it time to ban "Gain of Function" testing?
1 Replies
3278 Views
0 Tags
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
evan_au
(OP)
Global Moderator
Naked Science Forum GOD!
11032
Activity:
7.5%
Thanked: 1486 times
Is it time to ban "Gain of Function" testing?
«
on:
25/04/2020 22:39:44 »
Allegations/rumors have surfaced about scientists doing "gain of function" testing on bat viruses in Wuhan.
- Some of the results from Chinese & US scientists have appeared in peer-reviewed journals (so it is claimed)
Are we in a serious-enough situation that there is a general international willingness to ban "gain of function" testing?
- Or is this something which is too hard to verify?
- Or will the process of defining what is banned be used by the crazies as a recipe to do precisely what is banned?
- And just create more plagues that spread around the globe?
- Or is this something which we really need to
keep
doing, to protect ourselves from new viruses?
See:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK285579/
Logged
evan_au
(OP)
Global Moderator
Naked Science Forum GOD!
11032
Activity:
7.5%
Thanked: 1486 times
Re: Is it time to ban "Gain of Function" testing?
«
Reply #1 on:
26/04/2020 10:27:31 »
A quick search in Google Scholar turned up this paper, with authors from Wuhan and North Carolina...
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4797993/
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tags:
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...