The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Does light have mass?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Down

Does light have mass?

  • 40 Replies
  • 18555 Views
  • 3 Tags

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline syhprum

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 5198
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 74 times
Re: Does light have mass?
« Reply #20 on: 11/05/2020 14:46:30 »
I did the calculation some while ago but I forget the answer now, I am amused by that song about lighting a penny candle from a star, pretty easy if you use our local star and a magnifying lens. 
Logged
 



Offline Bill S

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3630
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 114 times
Re: Does light have mass?
« Reply #21 on: 11/05/2020 19:38:50 »
might have trouble finding a penny candle, though.
Logged
There never was nothing.
 

Offline PmbPhy

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3902
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 126 times
Re: Does light have mass?
« Reply #22 on: 11/05/2020 21:46:55 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 09/05/2020 10:42:05
Quote from: Bill S on 08/05/2020 17:02:35
Energy is momentum times velocity; so, with velocity = “c”, energy = pc. 
Er, not quite!
Kinetic energy = ½mv2
Momentum = mv
You have to account for a factor of 2.
Hence Einstein's necessarily pedantic derivation: force is the rate of change of momentum, hence momentum = integral of force, and there's your multiple.
Dimensional analysis has an Achilles heel!
   
You're wrong, Bill's right. See my post. Kiinetic energy s not 1/2 mv^2 in relativity it's K = E= E - E_0
Logged
 

Offline hamdani yusuf

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 11803
  • Activity:
    79%
  • Thanked: 285 times
Re: Does light have mass?
« Reply #23 on: 12/05/2020 05:47:13 »
Quote from: PmbPhy on 03/05/2020 18:14:43
This mass is aka relativistic mass, holds for tachyons (v = c) and tardyons (v < c).
Quote
A tachyon or tachyonic particle is a hypothetical particle that always travels faster than light.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tachyon
Quote
The term comes from the Greek: ταχύ, tachy, meaning rapid. The complementary particle types are called luxons (which always move at the speed of light) and bradyons (which always move slower than light); both of these particle types are known to exist.
Logged
Unexpected results come from false assumptions.
 

Offline Bill S

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3630
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 114 times
Re: Does light have mass?
« Reply #24 on: 12/05/2020 20:56:51 »
Quote from: Pete
Bill's right

If I’m right, it would be good to know why.  Could you explain “K = E= E - E_0” please?
Logged
There never was nothing.
 



Offline PmbPhy

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3902
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 126 times
Re: Does light have mass?
« Reply #25 on: 13/05/2020 21:32:18 »
Quote from: Bill S on 12/05/2020 20:56:51
Quote from: Pete
Bill's right

If I’m right, it would be good to know why.  Could you explain “K = E= E - E_0” please?

The total energy E is the sum of kinetic energy K and rest energy E_0, i.e.

E = K + E_0

solve for K to get

K = E - E_0

« Last Edit: 18/05/2020 00:05:46 by alancalverd »
Logged
 

Offline Bill S

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3630
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 114 times
Re: Does light have mass?
« Reply #26 on: 14/05/2020 14:41:11 »
Thanks Pete.  I know I'll never be a mathematician, but with a bit of patient encouragement, I can grasp some of the basics, I think. :)
Logged
There never was nothing.
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21159
  • Activity:
    69.5%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: Does light have mass?
« Reply #27 on: 14/05/2020 17:15:45 »
All perfectly true, but E0 = 0 for a photon, so we are left with K = E = hc/λ. The question is how to derive p from E, knowing c. 

On matters of relativity I defer to Pete - over!
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline Bill S

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3630
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 114 times
Re: Does light have mass?
« Reply #28 on: 14/05/2020 19:34:35 »
“And I am right,
 And you are right,
 And all is right as right can be!”

G & S had a flair for apposite comments.
Logged
There never was nothing.
 



Offline Bill S

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3630
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 114 times
Re: Does light have mass?
« Reply #29 on: 16/05/2020 14:09:26 »
I’m still juggling these equations in my head and wondering if there is something I’ve missed.

E = K + E0, solve for K to get:   K = E – E0.
E = K + E0, therefore, K = E – E0
For a photon, E0 = 0, so K = E – 0.  I.e. K = E. 
We established earlier that Energy is momentum times velocity; given by the equation p = hf/c.
We also said that, because the velocity of a photon is “c”, hf/c times c = hf. Thus; E=hf.
If K = E, then K must = hf, in this scenario.
Logged
There never was nothing.
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21159
  • Activity:
    69.5%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: Does light have mass?
« Reply #30 on: 16/05/2020 15:05:43 »
Quote from: Bill S on 16/05/2020 14:09:26
We established earlier that Energy is momentum times velocity; given by the equation p = hf/c.
It wasn't "established" but merely stated!
As I said, classical momentum pm = 2Km/vm where Km is the kinetic energy of a nonrelativistic particle m of nonzero mass.
For a photon vΦ = c, . The question is why pΦ = E/c and not 2E/c.
As this has baffled me from time to time since 1964, I call upon the right honorable Pete for enlightenment!
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline Bill S

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3630
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 114 times
Re: Does light have mass?
« Reply #31 on: 16/05/2020 18:37:58 »
Quote
I call upon the right honorable Pete for enlightenment!

Thank goodness you are not asking me!  I look forward to Pete's response, in the hope that I might understand it. 
Logged
There never was nothing.
 

Offline PmbPhy

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3902
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 126 times
Re: Does light have mass?
« Reply #32 on: 16/05/2020 18:43:59 »
Quote from: Bill S on 16/05/2020 14:09:26
I’m still juggling these equations in my head and wondering if there is something I’ve missed.

E = K + E0, solve for K to get:   K = E – E0.
E = K + E0, therefore, K = E – E0
For a photon, E0 = 0, so K = E – 0.  I.e. K = E. 
We established earlier that Energy is momentum times velocity; given by the equation p = hf/c.
We also said that, because the velocity of a photon is “c”, hf/c times c = hf. Thus; E=hf.
If K = E, then K must = hf, in this scenario.

Seems okay to me.
Logged
 



Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21159
  • Activity:
    69.5%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: Does light have mass? r eveything else?
« Reply #33 on: 16/05/2020 22:30:42 »
Quote from: PmbPhy on 16/05/2020 18:43:59
Energy is momentum times velocity;
So why is E = pv for photons but ½pv for everything else?
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline PmbPhy

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3902
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 126 times
Re: Does light have mass?
« Reply #34 on: 17/05/2020 11:15:05 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 16/05/2020 22:30:42
Energy is momentum
So why is E = pv for photons but ½pv for everything else?
By the way, I was wrong when I said Bill was right when he said "Energy is momentum." . The E = pc for EM radiation is a derived quantity from electrodynamics. Only  in In classical mechanics does kinetic energy = pv/2 = (1/2) mv^2. In relativity kinetic energy = (gamma - 1)m_0 c^2. Kinetic energy + rest energy = E = total inertial energy. When v << c  ->  E = mv^2/2 where m is rest mass.

Mind you that when we're talking about energy here it doesn't refer to total energy just inertial energy. Total energy = kinetic energy + rest energy + potential energy.
« Last Edit: 17/05/2020 21:36:21 by PmbPhy »
Logged
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21159
  • Activity:
    69.5%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: Does light have mass?
« Reply #35 on: 18/05/2020 00:04:47 »
Hold on there pardner!
Quote
In relativity kinetic energy = (gamma - 1)m_0 c^2

Dang me if it ain't the fact that γ = 1/√(1-v2/c2)
Now yer photon critter is hi-tailin' thru the universe at v = c kinda by definition (curse that Limey Maxwell, denyin' the aether an' all)
Thus γφ = 1/√(0) which is one helluva lot, and (γφ - 1) ain't much smaller (see ole Bill's musin's on Cantor's infinities)
But m0 = 0 for them thar photons.
God-fearin' folk don't much approve o' Yankees multiplyin' the Good Lord's infinity by the Devil's zero, and puttin' in a dash o' Mr Einstein's c2 don't excuse such mathematical blasphemy.
I'm a-mindin' that y'all said E = K + E0 but ain't it the case that E0 = 0 'cause the photon bronco can't never stand still? 
So Eφ = "anything you like" + 0?  No wonder New England heathens have fallen under the spell of Darwin.

(I have the entire "Big Bang Theory" on DVD, and when all else fails I look to Sheldon's mother for guidance.) 
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline hamdani yusuf

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 11803
  • Activity:
    79%
  • Thanked: 285 times
Re: Does light have mass?
« Reply #36 on: 18/05/2020 04:19:29 »
Quote from: PmbPhy on 17/05/2020 11:15:05
Mind you that when we're talking about energy here it doesn't refer to total energy just inertial energy. Total energy = kinetic energy + rest energy + potential energy.
What is the potential energy of a photon? Can it have non-zero value?
Logged
Unexpected results come from false assumptions.
 



Offline PmbPhy

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3902
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 126 times
Re: Does light have mass?
« Reply #37 on: 18/05/2020 10:01:16 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 18/05/2020 00:04:47
Hold on there pardner!
Quote
In relativity kinetic energy = (gamma - 1)m_0 c^2

Dang me if it ain't the fact that γ = 1/√(1-v2/c2)
That only applies to particles which move at speeds less than the speed of light.

Quote from: alancalverd on 18/05/2020 00:04:47
I'm a-mindin' that y'all said E = K + E0 but ain't it the case that E0 = 0 'cause the photon bronco can't never stand still?
That's the reason I don't like to use the term "rest mass' do many relativists. I prefer the term proper mass defined as the magnitude of the 4-momentum of he particle divided by c^2, which is zero for photons.
Logged
 

Offline PmbPhy

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3902
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 126 times
Re: Does light have mass?
« Reply #38 on: 18/05/2020 10:03:40 »
Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 18/05/2020 04:19:29
What is the potential energy of a photon?
Zero.
Logged
 

Offline Bill S

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3630
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 114 times
Re: Does light have mass?
« Reply #39 on: 18/05/2020 19:00:08 »
Quote from: Pete
I was wrong when I said Bill was right when he said "Energy is momentum."

What I said was:

Quote from: Bill
Energy is momentum times velocity; so, with velocity = “c”, energy = pc.

Is this wrong?
Logged
There never was nothing.
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: light  / mass  / higgs boson 
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 1.701 seconds with 70 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.