The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. Permanent magnet motors: why do we use the pairs of unlike-poles of the magnets?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Permanent magnet motors: why do we use the pairs of unlike-poles of the magnets?

  • 1 Replies
  • 1505 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline investigator2100 (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 28
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Permanent magnet motors: why do we use the pairs of unlike-poles of the magnets?
« on: 05/05/2020 11:50:19 »
Permanent magnet motors: why do we use the pairs of unlike-poles of the magnets instead of like-poles?
Pairs of unlike poles of the permanent magnet can produce only attraction force.
A single magnetic force can act as a spring force only. Attraction force can attract an object only then the movement ceases. Repulsion force can repel two magnets away then the magnets cease to move. So, none of both forces can alone produce continuous motion.
The alternating occurrence of both forces is must between the same magnets to produce continuous motion; production of continuous motion is must to do work continuously.
If a single pole of a permanent magnet is used (instead of a pair of unlike poles) against an armature tooth the permanent magnet pole will produce both attraction and repulsion forces in harmony with the attraction and repulsion forces created by the armature teeth. The single permanent magnet pole will not have to attract the other member of an unlike-pole pair, so all its magnetic flux lines ‘B’ will have to act with the armature teeth only.
No repulsion force is produced in the usual PM DC motors. The armature teeth always travel to stronger points of attraction from weaker points of attraction. So, these motors work on the resultant attraction force. Repulsion force is totally wasted in these motors.
Why should the use of both forces that are created by a single PM Pole, not make a motor more efficient?
The use of single-pole does not mean that only one permanent magnet pole can be used against a whole armature. Instead, many like poles can be used against an armature.
Every one of the like poles will act independently with the armature teeth. So every one of the like poles will exert both attraction and repulsion forces on the teeth if the teeth are arranged properly.
Next time I will name the single-pole configuration as mono-field-poles configuration.
Link to the patterns of B lines of both Kinds of field poles is attached
Logged
 



Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    11.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Permanent magnet motors: why do we use the pairs of unlike-poles of the magnets?
« Reply #1 on: 05/05/2020 13:24:18 »
Quote from: investigator2100 on 05/05/2020 11:50:19
Permanent magnet motors: why do we use the pairs of unlike-poles of the magnets instead of like-poles?
We do that because it works.
Reversing one of the magnets would stop it working.

Of course, not all motors actually use two magnets, so the point is moot.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.24 seconds with 30 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.