The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Life Sciences
  3. Physiology & Medicine
  4. COVID-19
  5. Should we test superspreaders more frequently?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Should we test superspreaders more frequently?

  • 6 Replies
  • 2705 Views
  • 5 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline EvaH (OP)

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • ********
  • 271
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 3 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Should we test superspreaders more frequently?
« on: 08/06/2020 15:01:36 »
David asks:

I often read about super-emitters as the source of COVID-19 clusters. Might mass testing for super-emitters be beneficial in the control of COVID-19? If this could be done easily and inexpensively it could identify who should be tested for COVID regularly. A possible method might be able to be achieved visually with a laser sheet created by a mirror galvanometer.

What do you think?
Logged
 



Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21136
  • Activity:
    68.5%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: Should we test superspreaders more frequently?
« Reply #1 on: 08/06/2020 15:43:53 »
AFAIK there's nothing physiologically or anatomically special about "superspreaders", they just have more human contacts than others before they are identified and quarantined.

I have some lasers and a mirror galvanometer. Any suggestion of how to turn this kit into a virus d3etector. never mind identifier, would be greatly appreciated!
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline set fair

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 467
  • Activity:
    1.5%
  • Thanked: 19 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Should we test superspreaders more frequently?
« Reply #2 on: 08/06/2020 16:30:59 »
Mass testing:- never mind super spreaders, if we could do mass testing then we could virtually eliminate the virus.
Logged
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21136
  • Activity:
    68.5%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: Should we test superspreaders more frequently?
« Reply #3 on: 08/06/2020 17:32:20 »
All testing does is show you that you haven't eliminated it. Only quarantine (easy) or a vaccine (one day, perhaps) will eliminate it.
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    13.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Should we test superspreaders more frequently?
« Reply #4 on: 08/06/2020 18:15:50 »
By the time we had done enough testing to identify someone as a "superspreader"- whatever that might mean, they would probably have shaken off the infection and no longer be infectious.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



Online evan_au

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 11032
  • Activity:
    7.5%
  • Thanked: 1486 times
Re: Should we test superspreaders more frequently?
« Reply #5 on: 08/06/2020 20:57:27 »
The problem with superspreaders is that they often show no symptoms (or they ignore the symptoms), so there is no obvious reason to test them. And they sometimes just don't recover, as their body makes no effective immune response to the pathogen.

The second characteristic is that by their behavior they are in a position to pass it on to many others.

The story of "Typhoid Mary" is instructive. In the end, the health authorities had to arrest her, and send her to an island, and provide food and accommodation for her for the rest of her life.

See: https://www.sciencefriday.com/articles/science-diction-quarantine/
Logged
 

Offline Petrochemicals

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3629
  • Activity:
    8%
  • Thanked: 182 times
  • forum overlord
Re: Should we test superspreaders more frequently?
« Reply #6 on: 09/06/2020 00:36:59 »
Quote from: evan_au on 08/06/2020 20:57:27
The story of "Typhoid Mary" is instructive. In the end, the health authorities had to arrest her, and send her to an island, and provide food and accommodation for her for the rest of her life.

See: https://www.sciencefriday.com/articles/science-diction-quarantine/
A long term virus reservoir, capable of spreading a disease throughout her lifetime, maybe quarantine will never ever be a solution to cold viruses either.
Logged
For reasons of repetitive antagonism, this user is currently not responding to messages from;
BoredChemist
To ignore someone too, go to your profile settings>modifyprofie>ignore!
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: superspreader  / coronavirus  / covid 19  / covid  / testing coronavirus 
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.306 seconds with 44 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.