The Naked Scientists
Toggle navigation
Login
Register
Podcasts
The Naked Scientists
eLife
Naked Genetics
Naked Astronomy
In short
Naked Neuroscience
Ask! The Naked Scientists
Question of the Week
Archive
Video
SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
Articles
Science News
Features
Interviews
Answers to Science Questions
Get Naked
Donate
Do an Experiment
Science Forum
Ask a Question
About
Meet the team
Our Sponsors
Site Map
Contact us
User menu
Login
Register
Search
Home
Help
Search
Tags
Member Map
Recent Topics
Login
Register
Naked Science Forum
On the Lighter Side
New Theories
Nuclear Transition Energies should be Negative?
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Nuclear Transition Energies should be Negative?
0 Replies
904 Views
0 Tags
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
talanum1
(OP)
Hero Member
775
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 5 times
Naked Science Forum Newbie
Nuclear Transition Energies should be Negative?
«
on:
02/10/2020 19:23:59 »
For an atom the transition energy of a larger atom is larger than for a smaller atom. Here transition energies is positive. However for a nucleus the opposite must be true since we are dealing with particles of the same charge. The Coulomb energy must be negative, if this is larger than the strong force energy the overall transition energy must be negative.
If we can turn of the color charge of up and down quarks and make a system of "protons" composed of these, the transition energies would be negative.
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tags:
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...