The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. New model of the Universe.
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4   Go Down

New model of the Universe.

  • 66 Replies
  • 25763 Views
  • 4 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline AlexandrKushnirtshuk (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 106
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (04.12.1984), Ukraine, Lutsk
Re: New model of the Universe.
« Reply #40 on: 24/03/2021 20:13:32 »
Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter contradicts planetary science
Jupiter and Venus Papers
Logged
Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (04.12.1984), Ukraine, Lutsk
 



Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    14.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: New model of the Universe.
« Reply #41 on: 24/03/2021 20:20:27 »
Come on...
Surely you can do better than that?

The first one has a picture of part of the surface of Mars and says
". Note that in the images there are a number of impacts, but there are no impacts on the flow features."

And then it shows a picture featuring this.
I have clipped and enlarged it so you can see the features I have highlighted.

It's such a pathetic bare faced lie.

And that. presumably, is the "best" you can do by way of supporting your idea.

* Mars.jpg (60.82 kB, 360x516 - viewed 235 times.)
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 8082
  • Activity:
    4%
  • Thanked: 514 times
Re: New model of the Universe.
« Reply #42 on: 24/03/2021 23:14:01 »
The tidal force equation is Gm(2r/d3), where "G" is the gravitational constant, "m" is the mass of the body causing the tides, "r" is the radius of the body experiencing the tides, and "d" is the distance between the bodies. Mars in geosynchronous orbit (35,786 kilometers) would be 10.74 times closer than the Moon's average distance and have a mass 8.7 times higher. The tidal component due to the distance alone would be 1,238.8 times higher than that of the Moon, multiplied by the mass factor would be 1,238.8 x 8.7 = 10,777. So Mars in geosynchronous orbit would cause tides on Earth over 10,000 times greater than that of the Moon. We are talking about catastrophic flooding and earthquakes.

Such a massive object coming so close to Earth would have no doubt had a massive impact on the Moon's orbit and may have even thrown it out of orbit. Then you have the fact that ancient human civilizations would have seen a gigantic object sitting in the sky. They would have made mention of it.

The entire scenario is beyond implausible.
« Last Edit: 24/03/2021 23:17:43 by Kryptid »
Logged
 

Offline AlexandrKushnirtshuk (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 106
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (04.12.1984), Ukraine, Lutsk
Re: New model of the Universe.
« Reply #43 on: 29/03/2021 11:32:43 »
Granite is found only on Earth. It was not found either in meteorites or on other "planets" of the solar system. Officially it is unknown why. I suppose, it is because the Earth is the largest object in the Universe, with the greatest gravity and pressure in the subsoil.

Quote
The role of granites in the structure of the upper shells of the Earth is enormous, but unlike magmatic rocks of the basic composition (gabbro, basalt, anorthosite, norite, troctolite), analogs of which are common on the Moon and terrestrial planets, this rock is found only on our planet and has not yet been established among meteorites or on other planets of the solar system. Among geologists there is an expression "Granite is the calling card of the Earth".

Links to quote source in russian (did not find the same in english):
1) https://beversmarmyr.com.ua/articles/istoriya-formirovaniya-granita
2) https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Гранит#Проблема_происхождения_гранитов
Logged
Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (04.12.1984), Ukraine, Lutsk
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    14.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: New model of the Universe.
« Reply #44 on: 29/03/2021 12:22:57 »
Quote from: AlexandrKushnirtshuk on 29/03/2021 11:32:43
I suppose, it is because the Earth is the largest object in the Universe,
In reality, Earth is not the largest object in the Universe.
So that can't be the reason.

If there was granite on Mars, or the Moon, how would we know about it?
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 8082
  • Activity:
    4%
  • Thanked: 514 times
Re: New model of the Universe.
« Reply #45 on: 29/03/2021 22:55:47 »
Are still going on about this nonsense? Your model is wronger than wrong. The Earth is nowhere near the largest object in the Universe. It is dwarfed by the Sun, and the Sun isn't even a particularly large star.
Logged
 

Offline AlexandrKushnirtshuk (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 106
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (04.12.1984), Ukraine, Lutsk
Re: New model of the Universe.
« Reply #46 on: 20/09/2021 03:45:54 »
Why, over 70 years of space exploration (development) by the efforts of all mankind, this space is still not being mastered (developed) in any way? Of all the objects in the celestial sphere, all "stars" and "planets" for some reason are one to one + - brightness. Only the Sun and the Moon stand out with the same angular dimensions (the dimensions are proportional to the distances to the Earth) and the same axial rotation periods - 27 days.

Japan - the land of the rising Sun.
The name of the country “Mexico” and the city of Mexico City are believed to be derived from the words metztli (“Moon”) and xictli (“navel, middle”), thus meaning “middle of the Moon”.


Traces from the Sun and Moon on the Earth's surface.
1) Ratio of diameters ~ 3 to 1.
2) Both have an east direction.
3) Both have an eastern position relative to their Pra-Continents (Pra-America and Pra-Eurasia).
4) Both have diametrically opposite locations on the surface of the Earth.



What else, if not the Sun and Moon, could have formed tectonic plates in these places?



(huge trail of clearly cosmic origin between South America and Antarctica, animation of the trajectory of a solar eclipse shadow and a schematic drawing)

New model of the Universe.

« Last Edit: 23/09/2021 08:59:23 by Colin2B »
Logged
Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (04.12.1984), Ukraine, Lutsk
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    14.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: New model of the Universe.
« Reply #47 on: 20/09/2021 12:45:27 »
Quote from: Kryptid on 29/03/2021 22:55:47
Are still going on about this nonsense?
He is.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline AlexandrKushnirtshuk (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 106
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (04.12.1984), Ukraine, Lutsk
Re: New model of the Universe.
« Reply #48 on: 20/09/2021 16:06:33 »
Another small, but very interesting fact indirectly confirms my model of the Universe. On the American continents, there are armadillos in the wild, but no hedgehogs. In Africa and Eurasia, there are hedgehogs in the wild, but no armadillos.

Armadillos habitat and hedgehogs habitat.
Hedgehogs and the Sun have thorns.
Armadillos and the Moon have no thorns.

1) Self-organization
2) Fundamental aspects of the Universe



« Last Edit: 20/09/2021 16:12:23 by AlexandrKushnirtshuk »
Logged
Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (04.12.1984), Ukraine, Lutsk
 



Offline AlexandrKushnirtshuk (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 106
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (04.12.1984), Ukraine, Lutsk
Re: New model of the Universe.
« Reply #49 on: 20/09/2021 16:09:42 »
Michelson–Morley experiment is a complex and extremely important experiment that has been refined and repeated since 1881. Its task is to prove the existence of a medium for the propagation of light and radio waves - ether. The main factor of this experience is the speed of the Earth's movement in space (the length of the Earth's orbit). The received data turns out to be much less than expected. In my model of the Universe, the length of the Earth's orbit and the speed of the Earth's movement are much less than the official ones ... It MAY has already been experimentally proven: 1) the existence of ether; 2) my model of the Universe.

Ordinary waves have a medium - water.
Sound waves have a medium - a gas (atmosphere).
Do light and radio waves have a medium? The ether has not yet been officeally proven.

The aquatic environment is inhabited.
The gaseous environment (atmosphere) is inhabited.
Is the ether inhabited? Where do UFOs come from? Where do the “aliens” (angels / demons) live?




Rotation of the Earth and the Sun around common center of mass (Earth is larger).

Logged
Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (04.12.1984), Ukraine, Lutsk
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    14.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: New model of the Universe.
« Reply #50 on: 20/09/2021 17:53:19 »
Quote from: AlexandrKushnirtshuk on 20/09/2021 16:06:33
Hedgehogs and the Sun have thorns.
Meanwhile, back in the real world...
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline Just thinking

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1009
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 144 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: New model of the Universe.
« Reply #51 on: 20/09/2021 20:02:20 »
Is this theory a consequence of a head injury?
Logged
 

Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 8082
  • Activity:
    4%
  • Thanked: 514 times
Re: New model of the Universe.
« Reply #52 on: 20/09/2021 20:06:27 »
Quote from: AlexandrKushnirtshuk on 20/09/2021 16:06:33
Another small, but very interesting fact indirectly confirms my model of the Universe. On the American continents, there are armadillos in the wild, but no hedgehogs. In Africa and Eurasia, there are hedgehogs in the wild, but no armadillos.

Armadillos habitat and hedgehogs habitat.
Hedgehogs and the Sun have thorns.
Armadillos and the Moon have no thorns.

I think this is the most ridiculous argument I have seen you make yet.
Logged
 



Offline Just thinking

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1009
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 144 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: New model of the Universe.
« Reply #53 on: 20/09/2021 20:15:02 »
Quote from: Kryptid on 20/09/2021 20:06:27
Armadillos habitat and hedgehogs habitat.
Hedgehogs and the Sun have thorns.
Armadillos and the Moon have no thorns.
In Australia, kangaroos have long tails so do comments. In Africa, there are many ants the sky has many stars.
Logged
 

Offline AlexandrKushnirtshuk (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 106
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (04.12.1984), Ukraine, Lutsk
Re: New model of the Universe.
« Reply #54 on: 20/09/2021 20:18:27 »
Moon size. Calculation and confirmation.

The duration of an eclipse is directly proportional to the size of the object, all other things being equal (distance and speed). The duration of the total phase of a solar eclipse is 7.5 minutes (the Moon completely covers the Sun for 7.5 minutes). The duration of the total phase of the lunar eclipse is 108 minutes (the Earth completely covers the Sun for 108 minutes). With the same distance between the Moon and the Earth. At the same speed of the Moon (the orbit of the Moon moves with the speed of the Earth). The diameter of the Earth is 12,742 km. Therefore, the diameter of the Moon can be calculated using the following formula: 12 742 * (7.5 / 108) = 885 km. The official diameter of the Moon is 3,474 km. Moreover, the result of calculating the diameter of the Moon quite accurately coincides with the size of the track between South America and Antarctica (875 km. + - 25 km.), which confirms the calculation and minimizes probability of a simple coincidence.



Why, over 70 years of space exploration (development) by the efforts of all mankind, this space is still not being mastered (developed) in any way? Of all the objects in the celestial sphere, all "stars" and "planets" for some reason are one to one + - brightness. Only the Sun and the Moon stand out with the same angular dimensions (the dimensions are proportional to the distances to the Earth) and the same axial rotation periods - 27 days.

« Last Edit: 23/09/2021 09:01:00 by Colin2B »
Logged
Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (04.12.1984), Ukraine, Lutsk
 

Offline AlexandrKushnirtshuk (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 106
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (04.12.1984), Ukraine, Lutsk
Re: New model of the Universe.
« Reply #55 on: 20/09/2021 20:25:11 »
[Moderator's note to readers: the following statements about the COVID pandemic are not based on the facts. Please do not regard them as trustworthy]


[/WARNING - THIS POST IS FALSE NEWS - CLICK AND BE BRAINWASHED AT YOUR OWN RISK
Spoiler: show
 [/b]
Assumptions about the main cause of the coronavirus pandemic. Firstly, this is important, and secondly, it is associated with solar activity, therefore it is not offtopic.

In 2009 there was a swine flu epidemic (on the verge of a pandemic) and there was a solar minimum. In 2019, the solar minimum and the coronavirus pandemic began. For 10 years, the ecology has worsened significantly + the current solar minimum is probably weaker (more extreme) than the previous one. The current coronavirus pandemic may be an exacerbation of seasonal Acute Respiratory Infections due to a decrease in solar activity.

The death rate from coronavirus is less than 10% - this is probably comparable to the death rate from influenza. In addition, the coronavirus can be a type (mutation) of influenza or some kind of ARVI (acute respiratory viral infection). Over time, human organisms would adapt to this virus and the mortality rate would go down. It is also possible that vaccination may be more harmful than beneficial. A mortality rate of less than 10% is like a slightly increased temperature in the body, which is not recommended to be brought down with additional means (medications, drugs), because this can cause more harm.



« Last Edit: 23/09/2021 09:04:34 by Colin2B »
Logged
Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (04.12.1984), Ukraine, Lutsk
 

Offline Just thinking

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1009
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 144 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: New model of the Universe.
« Reply #56 on: 20/09/2021 21:39:51 »

* comet and kangaroo.PNG (972.71 kB . 1231x375 - viewed 2157 times)
Quote from: AlexandrKushnirtshuk on 20/09/2021 16:06:33
Hedgehogs and the Sun have thorns.
I think this is far more convincing to support your theory.
Logged
 



Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    14.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: New model of the Universe.
« Reply #57 on: 20/09/2021 21:54:55 »
Quote from: AlexandrKushnirtshuk on 20/09/2021 20:25:11
Assumptions about the main cause of the coronavirus pandemic. Firstly, this is important, and secondly, it is associated with solar activity, therefore it is not offtopic.

In 2009 there was a swine flu epidemic (on the verge of a pandemic) and there was a solar minimum. In 2019, the solar minimum and the coronavirus pandemic began. For 10 years, the ecology has worsened significantly + the current solar minimum is probably weaker (more extreme) than the previous one. The current coronavirus pandemic may be an exacerbation of seasonal Acute Respiratory Infections due to a decrease in solar activity.

The death rate from coronavirus is less than 10% - this is probably comparable to the death rate from influenza. In addition, the coronavirus can be a type (mutation) of influenza or some kind of ARVI (acute respiratory viral infection). Over time, human organisms would adapt to this virus and the mortality rate would go down. It is also possible that vaccination may be more harmful than beneficial. A mortality rate of less than 10% is like a slightly increased temperature in the body, which is not recommended to be brought down with additional means (medications, drugs), because this can cause more harm.
Do not post dangerous nonsense.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 8082
  • Activity:
    4%
  • Thanked: 514 times
Re: New model of the Universe.
« Reply #58 on: 20/09/2021 22:34:36 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 20/09/2021 21:54:55
Do not post dangerous nonsense.

I have to agree.

@AlexandrKushnirtshuk Do not post misinformation about COVID. We don't tolerate that on this forum. If you continue, then you will risk disciplinary action.
Logged
 

Offline AlexandrKushnirtshuk (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 106
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (04.12.1984), Ukraine, Lutsk
Re: New model of the Universe.
« Reply #59 on: 21/09/2021 19:02:21 »
A similar process in the Sun. During the formation of the Moon and the Sun at the poles of ProtoEarth, there were no more objects in space/Universe, no other gravitational and electromagnetic fields. Nothing prevented the formation of the Moon and the Sun at the poles of the ProtoEarth, from the interior/core of the ProtoEarth.




Spoiler: "+4 images" • show








« Last Edit: 21/09/2021 20:33:35 by AlexandrKushnirtshuk »
Logged
Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (04.12.1984), Ukraine, Lutsk
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: astronomy  / space  / universe  / new model of the universe 
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.216 seconds with 69 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.