[trevorjohnson32 (OP)]

So the denser the space medium is the more wiggle room it has and the more anti-pressure. This is different then the standard term for density, the denser a substance more pressure it has. Space medium density here refers not to the density of a substance, but density in the space medium itself compared to the general density of the space medium that makes the universe.

[Bored chemist]

The density of space is zero.

[trevorjohnson32 (OP)]

The density of space is zero.

I'm saying that the standard density of the universe is zero and you can have negative space pressure by compacting the space medium itself through gravity fields or spinning something high speed, spinning heavy weight layered with fusion fuel 'cells' could ease the fusion process so that it happens at a lower pressure. You could use a smaller laser system then the one they're working on to ignite the spinning fuel.

[Bored chemist]

I'm saying that the standard density of the universe is zero and you can have negative space pressure by compacting the space medium itself through gravity fields or spinning something high speed, spinning heavy weight layered with fusion fuel 'cells' could ease the fusion process so that it happens at a lower pressure.

Why are you saying that?
It's not meaningful.

[syhprum]

Not quite zero I have seen the density of inter galactic space quoted as one one proton per cubic meter.
This would cause a small difference in the velocity of Electra magnetic radiation and Neutrinos

[Bored chemist]

...one proton per cubic meter...

The space between them has a density of zero.

[Hayseed]

Let's go out and corral that meter with a structure.   And then remove that proton.   That space still has billions of physical entities in it.  And you can detect and measure it.  The entities are moving at c.  They are EM emission entities.  They are real.  They super impose.  So that any point of that volume will vary in strength at a high rate.  If you put a low velocity charge in that volume, those entities will twist and torque that charge in all directions. 

(If some of that static is at the certain duration and at a certain angle, it can even charge the charge to a higher level.  And if that static is at another certain duration at another certain angle, it can cause an emission from that charge and drop it's energy level.  The correct duration at the correct angle can set any level of that charge you want.  I am straying now.)

Static.  Modern science calls it foam.  Q foam.  This is where all the magic comes from.....this is modern physics reality.

One would need to travel a far distance to experience the true emptiness of space.  But some think space came into being with matter.  So, no empty space for them.

Mass is not necessary for density.  Mass is an ordered density.  Fields from mass have an ordered density.  Ordered densities have momentum.  Ordered EM fields have momentum.  Mass is not needed for momentum either.

Multiple directional emissions are an unordered density.  Unordered densities can have short fleeting periods of momentum too.....due to superposition.  If they see it, they call it intermittent mass.  Popping in and out of existence.   From the Q universe.

Space has a density of zero.  But the space around here has temporary occupancy of continuous propagated static.  That flowing residence has a density.

I don't believe it interacts with g.  Or that this density can be curved or guided.

[Bored chemist]

A space with a bus in it doesn't have mass- the bus has mass, but the space doesn't.
A space with photons in it doesn't have mass either

[trevorjohnson32 (OP)]

A space with a bus in it doesn't have mass- the bus has mass, but the space doesn't.

Bus in space is just a wee size. Space's 'weight change' from having mass in its precence is only detectable by changes in a weight scale put at different levels appropriate to the mass that creates gravity.