[Bored chemist]

Pressure.

Then you are an idiot, a liar, or a troll, because I already explained why the pressure  pumps in the wrong direction.

At a depth of 10 metres the pressure (at equilibrium) is over 1 bar.
At 20 Km depth,  a  full compressed air cylinder would be crushed by the temperature and pressure.
What do you think is forcing the air down to that depth?
Are you trying to blame the Devil's farts or something?

[Bored chemist]

Why is this idiocy in New Theories?

Good point.
Even "That can't be true" is flattering it.

[Origin]

Why is this idiocy in New Theories? It is not a new theory, it is utter nonsense with the OP not engaging with comments and posting increasingly outlandish nonsense. It is trolling and should be moved/locked.

I have to agree this topic is just silly.

[Yusup Hizirov (OP)]

Pressure.

Then you are an idiot, a liar, or a troll, because I already explained why the pressure  pumps in the wrong direction.

At a depth of 10 metres the pressure (at equilibrium) is over 1 bar.
At 20 Km depth,  a  full compressed air cylinder would be crushed by the temperature and pressure.
What do you think is forcing the air down to that depth?
Are you trying to blame the Devil's farts or something?

At great depths, liquids and gases are under high pressure and temperature. And the result of their interaction and state of aggregation is a big mystery. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_of_matter

[The Spoon]

Mods. Please relegate this idiotic nonsense to 'That Cant Be True'.

[Bored chemist]

And their state of aggregation is a big mystery.

It's not a mystery, and it's not relevant.
The state of matter in the layers between the surface and those great depths is well characterised- it's just ****ing rocks.
And they don't magically pump air down to the depths because, in doing so, they would lift themselves against gravity.
So that would be a breach of the conservation of energy.

[The Spoon]

And their state of aggregation is a big mystery.

It's not a mystery, and it's not relevant.
The state of matter in the layers between the surface and those great depths is well characterised- it's just ****ing rocks.
And they don't magically pump air down to the depths because, in doing so, they would lift themselves against gravity.
So that would be a breach of the conservation of energy.

I can't work out if the OP is an utter fool or is trolling.

[Bored chemist]

And their state of aggregation is a big mystery.

It's not a mystery, and it's not relevant.
The state of matter in the layers between the surface and those great depths is well characterised- it's just ****ing rocks.
And they don't magically pump air down to the depths because, in doing so, they would lift themselves against gravity.
So that would be a breach of the conservation of energy.

I can't work out if the OP is an utter fool or is trolling.

I'm not sure I care; he shouldn't be here.

[The Spoon]

And their state of aggregation is a big mystery.

It's not a mystery, and it's not relevant.
The state of matter in the layers between the surface and those great depths is well characterised- it's just ****ing rocks.
And they don't magically pump air down to the depths because, in doing so, they would lift themselves against gravity.
So that would be a breach of the conservation of energy.

I can't work out if the OP is an utter fool or is trolling.

I'm not sure I care; he shouldn't be here.

I agree totally. I don't see why this thread (amongst others) is not liked or moved, given it is promoting a completely false narrative.

[Bored chemist]

There have been 7 contributors to this thread.
4 are now saying it should be moved to "new theories" (at best).
I imagine Alan would agree if asked.

[Bored chemist]

You forgot to address any of this.

Pressure.

Then you are an idiot, a liar, or a troll, because I already explained why the pressure  pumps in the wrong direction.

At a depth of 10 metres the pressure (at equilibrium) is over 1 bar.
At 20 Km depth,  a  full compressed air cylinder would be crushed by the temperature and pressure.
What do you think is forcing the air down to that depth?
Are you trying to blame the Devil's farts or something?

[Origin]

. Why is the epicenter circular rather than elongated along the fault line?

You mean like this?
https://www.usgs.gov/media/images/earthquake-map

[Yusup Hizirov (OP)]

You forgot to address any of this.

Pressure.

Then you are an idiot, a liar, or a troll, because I already explained why the pressure  pumps in the wrong direction.

At a depth of 10 metres the pressure (at equilibrium) is over 1 bar.
At 20 Km depth,  a  full compressed air cylinder would be crushed by the temperature and pressure.
What do you think is forcing the air down to that depth?
Are you trying to blame the Devil's farts or something?

The tidal force stretches and compresses the Earth twice a day, due to which pressure decreases and increases under the earth's crust. As a result, air penetrates into underground voids and cracks.

[Yusup Hizirov (OP)]

. Why is the epicenter circular rather than elongated along the fault line?

You mean like this?
https://www.usgs.gov/media/images/earthquake-map

а) According to the tectonic hypothesis, the diameter of the epicentral area depends on the depth of the source and should exceed 1000 km.

[Yusup Hizirov (OP)]

Criticism of the tectonic hypothesis.
1. Why do earthquakes occur both at the junction of tectonic plates and in the center of the plate?
a) As a seismic wave, moving from the source to the epicenter, over a distance of more than 700 km. falls exactly on the fault line. https://uc.xyz/SyD44?pub=link
2. The statement that stress accumulates at the junction of tectonic plates raises doubts.
a) How much is the density of the tectonic plate at the junction greater than in the middle of the plate?
b) Does tectonics affect the rate of well drilling?
3. Tectonic plates cannot have the properties of a spring or rubber.
a) This can be easily verified by testing. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plate_tectonics
4. Why is the epicenter circular rather than elongated along the fault line?

During earthquakes, people and objects that are at the epicenter are strongly thrown up. I believe that only an underground explosion is capable of this.

[Origin]

During earthquakes, people and objects that are at the epicenter are strongly thrown up. I believe that only an underground explosion is capable of this

Your belief is nonsense.

[Origin]

а) According to the tectonic hypothesis, the diameter of the epicentral area depends on the depth of the source and should exceed 1000 km.

Please stop posting nonsense.

[Yusup Hizirov (OP)]

Criticism of the tectonic hypothesis.
1. Why do earthquakes occur both at the junction of tectonic plates and in the center of the plate?
a) As a seismic wave, moving from the source to the epicenter, over a distance of more than 700 km. falls exactly on the fault line. https://uc.xyz/SyD44?pub=link
2. The statement that stress accumulates at the junction of tectonic plates raises doubts.
a) How much is the density of the tectonic plate at the junction greater than in the middle of the plate?
b) Does tectonics affect the rate of well drilling?
3. Tectonic plates cannot have the properties of a spring or rubber.
a) This can be easily verified by testing. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plate_tectonics
4. Why is the epicenter circular rather than elongated along the fault line?

During earthquakes, people and objects that are at the epicenter are strongly thrown up. I believe that only an underground explosion is capable of this.

a) Then, from the epicenter, waves radiate in all four directions. And not horizontal vibrations of the earth's crust.

[The Spoon]

а) According to the tectonic hypothesis, the diameter of the epicentral area depends on the depth of the source and should exceed 1000 km.

Please stop posting nonsense.

He wont - he is trolling and just posting continual crap.

[alancalverd]

You can learn a lot about tectonics by watching paint dry.  And it's much more entertaining than this thread.