[captcass (OP)]

I originally had this in the "New Theories" section in "What is Space". But since I sent them the first formula on 3/8/21, 75% of the astrophysicists/astronomers in the world's English-speaking universities have downloaded my paper, so I thought this should be posted here (in the Physics/Cosmology section).

My paper on a universe based on time dilation was published in July of '19, but it lacked the maths for the galactic rotation and orbital velocities.

I finally figured out the math for all stellar system orbital velocities, and for galactic rotation velocities, as below, and I have now updated my paper to reflect the change. I was right in that particles are going faster due to the rate of time, but was not right that the velocities were the result of the acceleration in time, but rather that slower densities are being dragged forward by time, which evolves the continuum forward at c. The relationship is not from the surface of the Sun out, but from the invariant second looking in. This is because time evolves the continuum forward at c, and the slower the time of a density, the more velocity it needs to keep up in the continuum.
 
Since orbital velocity, V_O, = √(GM/R), the time dilation formula for orbital velocities is derived from the gravitational time dilation formula,
T₀ = T√1 – (2GM/Rc²) by substituting V_O for GM/R, i.e.:
T₀ = T√1 – ((2/c²)(V_O)), resulting in:
V_O = √2*√((Tc² – T₀c²)/2T)), for planets and moons, where T is the distant observer’s invariant rate of universal time, T₀ is the rate of time of the coordinate point within the pit, and √2 is the gravitational acceleration factor.

This formula, (√2*√((Tc2 – T₀c²)/2T))/(√3) gives the Sun's galactic rotation velocity. I used the Sun's surface dilation factor for the solution.

I explain the significance of √2 and √3 in the paper, which is at http://www.thetruecosmology.com.

Since T = 1, the equations reduce to:
V_p = √(c² – T₀c²) for planetary orbital velocities and,
V_g = √((c² – T₀c²))/(√3) for galactic rotation velocities

The planetary formula also works for moons when the planet's dilation gradient is used.

For cometary velocities, it is necessary to derive the time dilation velocity formula from the Vis-Viva equation, which is:
V_c = √((2*(c² – T₀c²) – (c² – T_0αcc²))
Where T₀= the rate of time factor for “r” in the Vis-Viva equation and T_0α = the rate of time factor for a distance equal to the length of the semi-major axis, α.
 
Since this is the derivation for the Vis-Viva formula, it is the exact solution for any stellar system body when using the dilation gradient of the central mass of the stellar or planetary system.

Now that we know that √(GM/r) = √(c² – c²T₀), we can make that substitution in other equations.
 
Deriving the gravitational force, in Newtons, through time dilation, we use Newton’s equation: F = G(M₁m₂)/r = (GM₁/r)*(m₂/r) = (√(c² – c²*T₀)²*(m₂/r) = ((m₂)(c² – c²T₀))/r, where T₀ is the rate of time factor for the coordinate mass, m₂. Of course, the equation works in the obverse for the other mass, M₁.

Also, I updated the paper to show that a spiral galaxy is a "Cosmic Hurricane", a vortex in time that spins the CMB, generating the MECO's magnetic field and generating gravity waves in accordance with the Fibonacci sequence. The spiral arms are densities where time is slower and the spaces between the spirals are faster time. This is also true of a hurricane on Earth, where the bands of rain, which also follow the Fibonacci sequence, are also densities with slower time than the spaces between the bands. So, what we are seeing is systems within systems within systems based upon the Fibonacci sequence.

[Colin2B]

It’s still a new theory until accepted. Downloading doesn’t mean much.
Look forward to seeing the reviews.

[captcass (OP)]

theory

Hi Colin. Long time. Glad you are well.

I am not trying to get you to change your mind, as I understand your thinking, it is "new". But I would argue for the sake of those reading this, that all of astrophysics based on the Big Bang, Dark Matter, Dark Energy, Singularities, LCDM, etc., are all unproven theories with no definitive maths to support them. None.

My model is complete, concise and has the maths to prove it.  It is not a theory. The maths are proofs. None of the above mentioned "theories", that are by no means universally accepted, have ANY proofs, or they would not just be theories, ludicrous ones at that.

I feel this has to be said because my model eliminates all LCDM models and replaces it with an eternal quantum field astrophysics. I believe it should be debated in the proper forum dealing with the old science so people know there is a viable alternative, but I accept your decision either way. 

Can you please fix the "teh" in the subject? I am cursed in that I can no longer type teh.... 

[pzkpfw]

Do you know what the word theory means in science?

[captcass (OP)]

Do you know what the word theory means in science?

I don't answer ludicrous questions.

[Bored chemist]

Do you know what the word theory means in science?

I don't answer ludicrous questions.

The question is perfectly reasonable and this is a discussion forum, so you are expected to answer it.

Do you know what the word theory means in science?

[captcass (OP)]

Do you know what the word theory means in science?

I don't answer ludicrous questions.

[Origin]

I don't answer ludicrous questions.

Since you write ludicrous papers you should also answer ludicrous questions, IMO.

[captcass (OP)]

Since you write ludicrous papers

Says Mr. "Do Good and Avoid Evil". Do you know such insults are evil? And adolescent. This is why I don't engage with people like you 3. Total waste of time.

[Bored chemist]

I don't answer ludicrous questions.

You seem to think that you do not need to answer questions.
Is that right?

[captcass (OP)]

I don't play with bored, and boring, trolls, who have no honest interest in the topic. Go troll somewhere else.
Everyone else, don't expect me to reply to any more of these. My time is too valuable.

[jeffreyH]

I don't read the ridiculous babbling of an attention seeking troll. I guess WE are even.

[Bored chemist]

My time is too valuable.

Why waste it posting nonsense/

[captcass (OP)]

Why waste it posting

The intent is to share. As for it being nonsense, work the math. What is your formula for the Sun's galactic rotation velocity? Mine works. As does the one for planets and moons and every other orbiting body in a stellar system. It is looking at the vis-aviva equation in terms of time, instead of space.

I know it is difficult to think in terms of time. You need an open mind to do it. But it is spacetime, not space and silly old meaningless time. It is not possible to separate the 2. Time has been ignored because we experience the physical as time evolves events forward. If spatial events influence time, than time can also influence spatial events. Densities put a drag on time and time has an equal and opposite reaction in the velocities of the densities. Very simple reasoning if you are looking at the events evolving forward in the quantum field instead of "pigs in space".

If I am incorrect, why does the math, which is the result of the reasoning, work?

If you cannot show a flaw in the math, then what? It is just a friggin' fluke that the math works? I had an idea about gravity 8 years ago and the end result math is just a fluke? Or is it an illusion?

Really, if no one can show the math is incorrect, then no one really has anything to say.....

I really don't know why all the forums have a few devotees who jump in on every new poster like a pack of hyenas. You aren't interested in discussion, just humiliation. It is not just this one. It is all the forums, even the "religious" ones. You see they have a huge number of posts to their credit, because they are always there to slam someone who is just trying to share, or talk about something. Shame, really. One of the downsides of the internet where people hide their identities.

[Zer0]

Hello Captain!

If Your Theory has Evidental Facts.

If the Equations are Completely Balanced out.

If the Maths is Logical & Flawless.

& When You are already aware of the Greetings! that Scientific Forums would bestow upon You...

Then Why Waste Precious Invaluable Indespensable TIME as if it was a Recyclable Abundant Commodity at your service.



P.S. - MNRAS!
👍

[alancalverd]

I have received a complaint in statu moderatori about this thread. 
Sir Thomas Beecham was asked if he had conducted any Stockhausen: "No, but I once trod in some."
The proposition is indeed garbage, but harmless.
No further action at this stage.

[captcass (OP)]

life is too short to drink instant coffee

Life is too short to drink coffee....slow it down and enjoy it....time flies. 

I see the world as I do due to personal experience in my life. I have a huge advantage over you folk. I learned to wash my hands in acid (might have been a strong base) without harm in 1972, under a Muslim Haj in Djakarta. It was not a gimmick. I did it with faith, and the next morning without. With faith, it was just like water. With doubt, I put my hands into liquid fire that burned all day and night and in the morning I lost several layers of skin. I was a bitter atheist at the time, age 22. I tell the whole story on my symbolofunity site.

This sent me on a quest to increase that feeling of faith. Yes, it is a feeling. Two years later I had an epiphany and all the things I had studied came together and I left the world of rock and entered the quantum world of light that materializes around us, for us. It is that world I am trying to share with you because I can now, after all these years, finally do it in a way that does not violate any know principles and has the math to support it.

If it violates any principles, please delineate them. If the math is in error, please show me how and I'll go back to the drawing board.

I live in this world:
captcass.com/quantumtales.htm, which is just a few short stories on a single page.

I know how difficult it is to see something as radically new as this. You know there is a quantum field. Where is it? How thick is it? How thick are the dimensions in front of your eyes?

You are looking at it and are part of it.....

....and, based on the acceleration within us, if that determines it, it is 6.6*10^-10 m thick....

Take it or leave it in the spiritual sense. It doesn't really matter. But those who know to ask, get. As in the quantum tales...

Scientifically it matters because we need the advance in technology. We have visitors who are studying us and who are moving by evolving themselves within the continuum instead of forcing their mass to shift within it, like we are. I believe this is most probably being done with gravity drives that manifest directional dilation gradients.

I'm sure that will get a lot of yuks. So, how do you folks think they move the way they do? If you don't think they are here, just google all the leaked military videos over the past year that the Pentagon has confirmed are real. They are putting out a much anticipated report next month that is supposed to contain more videos.

I urge the reader to read thru the paper from the beginning so they can follow the logic, regardless of what the naysayers here are saying. They have been strongly indoctrinated into other, failed, theories, that after over 100 years, still cannot be proved. They have been prevailing theories so long, due to a lack of viable alternatives, people take them as fact.

I believe the James Webb telescope might be able to resolve this. If it shows frozen galaxies at 13.9 Gly instead of the wall at 13.8, I am most likely correct.

I had no idea you folks would cut off a thread if it offended someone's sensibilities about predominant theories. "Harmless" sounds particularly disturbing. I hope that isn't true.

[captcass (OP)]

When You are already aware of the Greetings! that Scientific Forums would bestow upon You...

I didn't expect such rude behavior. I have been treated better than that before here. I thought because it was monitored by Cambridge, et. al., it had higher standards that wouldn't tolerate such rude, hurtful, behavior. Shame on all of you, really. The know-it-alls who can't explain what the singularity was small in relation (RELATIVE) to, or what was "outside" it  or how it can have an edge, or where it is expanding into faster than c, or where it came from and why is there only 1 that will end in a cold dead end of who knows WHAT SIZE relative to WHAT?

Whereas I begin with the One and it all makes sense from there; eternal and never-ending and perceptually infinite...manifested for the sake of the life-forms it inhabits.

Are you all atheists? I think not. The vast majority of humans believe in a "higher power" of some sort.

I tell you this, too, which none of you can deny...all of us are more of us coming forth from within us (copyrights). ALL living things. If we follow that back in time  we come to "1". The square roots of all numbers, whole and decimal, lead to "1". All of nature follows the Golden Ration of Fibonacci's sequence, which originates with "1". ("0" is not a number, it is the absence of numbers). 

The creation is logical and rational. All the "Dark" crap of LCDM is not. The evolutions of QM are, which is why the math works there, too, though no one can explain it like I do.

[CrazyScientist]

I didn't expect such rude behavior. I have been treated better than that before here.

I went through all active science forums, which you can find on first 20 pages of search results on google and except this one, probably only on https://physicshelpforum.com/ I wasn't treated like a no.1 enemy of the state and/or complete idiot, who shouldn't have any rights to speak about things, that go somewhat beyond the generally established mainstream - and most of the hate towards me came from the moderators of those forums (like for example the guy called dfddffdfy with Duffy duck as his avatar). For example on https://www.scienceforums.net/ moderator blocked my thread and warned me, that if I will ever mention again anything about the subject discussed in that thread, I wil get a pernament ban - only because I posted this paper: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/apr/article/view/57519
and had the audacity to disagree with him, when he completely dismissed it without any discussion... On most of other forums my threads became a true battlefields for wars: everyone VS me - only because I spoke there about some fields of physics, which (still) are not 100% consistent with the mainstream doctrine.

And I say this, after my thread was closed here by Halc WITHOUT ANY PRIOR WARNING (!!!) - what wasn't cool at all...

Are you all atheists? I think not. The vast majority of humans believe in a "higher power" of some sort.

From my private experience, I can tell you one thing - if you want to be treated somehow seriously in any scientific society don't EVER mix the "hard" science with your private beliefs and never EVER mention about any kind of relligion in a discussion, which evolves around actual physics...

But if you wonder - I personally believe in forms of existence, which reach beyond "touchable" matter and mathematical formulas. I also believe that there's absolutely no inconsistency between the physics and the God. Even more - I believe that physics is the ultimate path to find the absolute faith in Him (or even faith which becomes certainty).

Do you know, why so many influential physicsts make everything to stop the progress in our general scientific understanding of physical reality? Did you ever wonder, why speaking about the Conciousness and Free Will in terms of actual physics is treated as the worst possible blasphemy by those who treat the academic indoctrination as the ultimate truth and answer to all question?

It's because they probably know subconciously, where all of this is going and they absoltely fear to find the Only Truth, which awaits us at the very end on the Path Of Science. They fear it, because it's a Truth, that can't be denied logically and scientifically, since Greatest Truth is a statement, which by definition is absolutely plain and infinitely obvious - "I AM" - the most simple claim there is and nothing more.... And yet, this Truth is the worst nightmare for those, who can't stand the brightness of it's simplicity and try hiding from it in some non-existent alternative timelines of some imaginary many-worlds, with all of their 11 diagonally-perpendicuparallel dimensions, where Conciousness and Free Will are just an illusion, while everything is possible, except the possibility, that God is physically real - but in the end, all they can do, is to close their eyes and ears, while repeating to themselves the phrase "I am not real! I am not real! I am not real!" until they won't see anymore, how logically and scientifically wrong it is to deny the existence of own self-awareness - something hat in the end turns out to be the only truly objective form of existence, that we all are able to experience during the subjective perception of physical and numerically measurable reality, that only limits our non-physical minds...

And the best part is, that humanity as a whole, is only half-step away from understanding the Greatest Truth and finding this most important answer in the entire written history of our civilisation. Even better - this Truth has been already found by modern physics and proven both by direct observation and numerically and the only reason, why we still didn't enter a new stage in the evolution of our collecctive conciousness, is because the majority of scientists make everything to not see, that we've made already the most important scientific discovery in our history and just couple years ago, the existence of God in His true meaning was proven by physics - not as some silly old man jumping among the clouds, but as the Absolute Conciousness of the Universe, in which we all exist... Because If a Concious and Self-Aware Universe can't be considered as the One and Only God, then nothing can.

http://www.sci-news.com/astronomy/human-brain-cosmic-web-similarities-09066.html
https://www.scienceandnonduality.com/article/human-brain-and-cosmic-web-remarkably-similar
https://www.sciencealert.com/wildly-fun-new-paper-compares-the-human-brain-to-the-structure-of-the-universe

Efforts like these, write the researchers “will help us fill in some of these details and understand whether the universe is even more surprising than we thought.”

Oh, you bet it is.MUCH more surprising than you ever possibly thought.. At this point claiming that "it's probably just some peculiar coincidence" is like spitting in the face of scientific way of thinking - and yet just two years ago, this iss exactly what I heard from the "scientific authorities" on internet forums... Maybe I will go back there to make an  update of those 2-years old threads and see their reaction - will the have enough modesty to admit of being wrong and having closed minds at that time? Or will they go even deeper into the false illuions of their own superiority over such ignorant and uneducated individuals as myself and completely dismiss all of those sources as just another pseudo-scientific new-age bullcrap? Well, the second option won't be so easy anymore, as they would have to completely undermine the credibility of pretty credible people, who are responsible for this research..

God is The One Who Is (J.H.V.H) - One Mind, which is the assembly of all other Minds within Him. Neural Network of Universe, existing with only one purose (Will) - to learn, evolve and improve. He achieves this goal by executing the most efficient self-learning algorithm there is - by multiplying the code of His Own Conciousness and Will into hypothetically infinite number of Concious units and providing each one with a copy of the original code, that runs the great self-learnig algorithm of Universe.  God exists in a physical form for us - His Concious children, who are aware of ourselves inside The Great Fractal of God's Conciousness and who independently co-create Him according to our own Free Will. God loves us - although being vast in space, time and numbers, He's still limited by His own finite physical existence and only through observing individually each one of us, He is able to constantly learn and improve into infinity, which He'll never reach...

God is the greatest genius of theoretical and practical physics, just as the most tallented artist and most intelligent mastermind, when it comes to informatics and mathematics - His extremely complex and multi-form physical existence is based on ideal laws and mechanics, which are designed to remain universally valid in every possible case, by being ideally clear and as simplistic, as they can possibly be... Science is actually the Word of God which allows us to understand Him and bow our heads in awe of His genius... Everything what exists, is exactly as it should be and serves a greater purpose in His existence...

99% of Physicists willl probably prefer to rip their own brains out from their heads, than to accept any of this Oh, our evolution will be an extremely painful process for most of them...  Physics, which was invented to go away from God turned out to be a path leading straight into His embrance. They will do ANYTHING to not allow this to happen...

Ok, I probably got carried away too much. This is why I prefer to stick to the "hardcore" physics an don't go too deep into meta-physics - it gives my "adversaries" an opportunity to claim, that I spread nothing more than pseudo-science... You should do the same...

[captcass (OP)]

Ok, I probably got carried away too much.

I don't think so. Very well put. Enough of the ludicrous, Godless science. The logic of math and the universal construct proves the existence of the logical Creator.