[Zer0]

Hello once again Captain!
🙏
First off, Apologies if You were hurt or felt insulted.
Neither i nor any other were trying to demean or belittle Your efforts.
🙏

If you just looked back n read thru the OP, you'd Realize you were asked a very simple basic question...
Which you Denied answering as
' Ludicrous '.
( so foolish, unreasonable, or out of place as to be amusing. )
👎

You mentioned ' You Do Not Have Time! '
⏳

" IF ONLY " you'd have managed to spend 30seconds...
' Theory '
( a supposition or a system of ideas intended to explain something, especially one based on general principles independent of the thing to be explained. )
🤷
Perhaps then, The OP would have moved forward in a positive direction.

    I Do Agree with You on the Point that...
" You mentioned ' You Do Not Have Time! ' ".
⌛
Look into the Mirror Good ol' Capitan...What do you see?
Alot of Whites, isn't it?
🤍

Reason being i mentioned ' MNRAS '
When You Know & are Aware that you have the Absolute Truth in Grasps, why bother to waste it on a Science Forum.
Why Not direct it towards the Right Path...
(Hint - Royal Astronomical Society)
🔭

And Yes, Shame on US for being Rational & Inquisitive.
☹️
& Cheers to you for being quite famous & a rare spiritual genius.
🥳

Once again, Sorry if you weren't expecting stringent inquiries...
I wonder if the treatment on OTHER forums was to ' roll out the red carpet for You. '
WE do Not adhere to those Customs & Traditions here.
👑

May it be You, or Newton or even Einstein for that matter.
WE Question!
(Fundamental Right)
🤘
I do Not wish to say another ' Word '.
& Red Marbles aren't a Rare Commodity.
🔴
Thank You for your Time & Patience & kind words towards Us.
🙏




Mr Crazy Scientist!
You are Literally living up to your Nickname...Congrats!
👌
May i suggest a slight modification... how bout Crazee Preacher?
🥴
( I was under the impression that
' Preaching ' would be Disallowed on the Forum. )

But Darling Mods are soo Sweet & Kind.
🥰
They are capable of suffering almost anything.
😇
Their Limits of ' Tolerance ' must be Appreciated.
👍👍👍
(If it were on Me, half the folks out here would have Disappeared by Now)



P.S. - Do Not Blame OTHERS for the Crappy crossroads of Life that You are driving upon...
🚙
It's Only the Consequence of the Choices you Yourself made in Life..
🚦
In short, it's Your Own Asphault!
🖖

[Bored chemist]

The logic of math and the universal construct proves the existence of the logical Creator.

Where did He come from?

[captcass (OP)]

Where did He come from?

It is not a "He" or "She". It just is. It is the only reality. "I Am That I Am",

Why Not direct it towards the Right Path...
(Hint - Royal Astronomical Society)

As I noted in the original post, I have sent this to every astrophysicist/astronomer at every English-speaking university worldwide (382 in total). 75% of them have downloaded the paper since I sent the first formula on 3/8.

Look into the Mirror Good ol' Capitan...What do you see?
Alot of Whites, isn't it?

What a load of racist filth. Hey moderator, do you folks allow racist comments here?

For those who are interested in such things, the Journal of Cosmology has a couple of volumes dedicated to essays on the Universal Cosmic Consciousness.

[Bored chemist]

It is not a "He" or "She". It just is. It is the only reality. "I Am That I Am",

We both know that isn't an answer.

[captcass (OP)]

We both know that isn't an answer

I don't know what you think you know, but that is the answer. We, all living things, are in Its image, not in form, but in spirit. It is why we hate boredom and fear loneliness. We, all living things, are how It escapes Its horrible eternal loneliness and passes Its eternity. It is losing Itself here.

All the great teachers taught this: If you would know the Creator, know yourself. The truth, kingdom of heaven, etc. lies within you.

Only seekers find the truth. The rest are lost in the illusion, which is the purpose of the Creation; the Creator loses Itself here. 

[Bored chemist]

We both know that isn't an answer

I don't know what you think you know, but that is the answer. We, all living things, are in Its image, not in form, but in spirit. It is why we hate boredom and fear loneliness. We, all living things, are how It escapes Its horrible eternal loneliness and passes Its eternity. It is losing Itself here.

All the great teachers taught this: If you would know the Creator, know yourself. The truth, kingdom of heaven, etc. lies within you.

Only seekers find the truth. The rest are lost in the illusion, which is the purpose of the Creation; the Creator loses Itself here. 

None of which has anything to do with answering my question.
where did He, She or It come from?

[CrazyScientist]

The logic of math and the universal construct proves the existence of the logical Creator.

Where did He come from?

Well, nothing can be certain in such metaphysical and philosophopial aspects of the existence itself. But if I would point out the most possible answer in terms of science, I would say, that He was "born" in the chaotic and endless field of primodial superposition of all possible states. Why or how could  this happen? Simply, the probability of a self-aware form of existence became at some point probable enough to collapse into a determined physical state... You can call this as the "Book Of Quantum Genesis"

[captcass (OP)]

None of which has anything to do with answering my question.
where did He, She or It come from?

I answered you. It is eternal and was not created. It did not begin, and it cannot end.

It is said we have eternal life because the life animating us, creating us from within, is eternal. Not our silly little egos, the life itself.

[CrazyScientist]

And when it comes to describing the endless field of primodial superposition, I would do it using a binary code:

1 Absolute existence "I AM"
0. Absolute non-existence

And with all the infinite possibilities of existence fitting between those two absolute states... 

[Zer0]

Where did He come from?

It is not a "He" or "She". It just is. It is the only reality. "I Am That I Am",

Perhaps you should consider quitting smokin dat sh!t.
If Reality's disagreeing with You, it ain't Reality which is at Fault.
👍

Why Not direct it towards the Right Path...
(Hint - Royal Astronomical Society)

As I noted in the original post, I have sent this to every astrophysicist/astronomer at every English-speaking university worldwide (382 in total). 75% of them have downloaded the paper since I sent the first formula on 3/8.

Downloading is Not Equal to Approval.
Mia Khalifa can easily Beat that.
👍

Look into the Mirror Good ol' Capitan...What do you see?
Alot of Whites, isn't it?

What a load of racist filth. Hey moderator, do you folks allow racist comments here?

Mods here have Excellent Communication Skills.
White - Singular. WhiteS - Plural.
I was Referring to the hair & beard.
Please brush up on your Grammar & Vocabulary.
& The point behind the referral was...You may have the Absolute Truth with you, but perhaps TIME is against you.
' You are that You are, Certainly Not Immortal. '
🖖


For those who are interested in such things, the Journal of Cosmology has a couple of volumes dedicated to essays on the Universal Cosmic Consciousness.

The Forum Does Not entertain Self Glorifying Ads.
But perhaps, they would be Kind with you.



P.S. - If Insult is what i would've had in Mind, then I'd have just asked You to ' Stick to Selling Marbles '.

GoodByee & Good Riddance Sir!
🙏

[The Spoon]

Ok, I probably got carried away too much.

I don't think so. Very well put. Enough of the ludicrous, Godless science. The logic of math and the universal construct proves the existence of the logical Creator.

So another religious nut job playing at science.

[Bored chemist]

I answered you. It is eternal and was not created. It did not begin, and it cannot end.

OK.
Why can't "the universe" or, at least" whatever physical phenomenon cause the universe" be the same thing?

Fundamentally this discussion is at odds with the title of the thread "God id it" is not a new model of the universe, it's a very old, and very unhelpful one.

[Colin2B]

Hi Colin. Long time. Glad you are well.

I am not trying to get you to change your mind, as I understand your thinking, it is "new".

Hi Cass, yes long time no see and you certainly have been busy.
I’ve changed your title.

The New Theories section was originally conceived as a serious section and if, for example, Alan Guth had first posted his expansion paper here, this is the section it would have been directed to and it certainly contained a lot of maths!

Unfortunately this section does attract a lot of cranks and pseudoscience, but it is certainly the right place to discuss new ideas.

Let us know if you have any positive responses from leading astronomers.

[captcass (OP)]

Why can't "the universe" or, at least" whatever physical phenomenon cause the universe" be the same thing?

This is pantheism. Einstein felt that the universe itself might be alive somehow. The trouble with that concept is there is no cause and effect. However, that does take us back to a UCC. "Split a rock and I am there".

Let us know if you have any positive responses from leading astronomers.

Hi Colin. Thanks. I swear, everything I write these days I have to go back through to change teh to the. I have had one phone call from an astrophysicist. He had me read Toomre's '71? paper so we could talk in terms of those models. I told him they didn't work because the perception was wrong. It is not bodies moving through an empty space. It is an evolving continuum, the quantum field. It was while explaining that to him that I realized why galaxies are spirals, cosmic hurricanes in the CMB, actually. I explain that in more detail in the paper. I expect to be talking with him again soon. It was after that that I found the vis-aviva solution and I know he is digesting things.

not a new model of the universe,

No one has presented this model before. The fact that it originates with the Creator has no bearing on it.

I am not discussing "religion" here. That is something entirely different. Religion is merely what we do or don't do regularly for our own well being and the well being of the community at large, along with ceremonies intended to induce a spiritual and respectful feeling in people. It is NOT spirituality.

If the UCC is the cause of causes, and we do not take that into account in our view of the universe, and our science, then we will never find true answers and fulfill our true potential as a species. For instance, it solves non-locality. Alice and Bob, being different points of view of the same overall being, are harmonized, like all our lives are, and must be, for the continuum to evolve coherently. .

[Bored chemist]

This is pantheism.

No.
It is atheism.

[Bored chemist]

I swear, everything I write these days I have to go back through to change teh to the.

That may be the only thing we have in common.

[Origin]

I don't think so. Very well put. Enough of the ludicrous, Godless science. The logic of math and the universal construct proves the existence of the logical Creator.

Yeah, you tell em!  I'll bet Jesus knows way more than Einstein ever knew about physics!

[captcass (OP)]

It is atheism.

Not if it is alive. Did you know you are alive? Parts of the continuum are alive, except the continuum has no "parts", it is a continuum. If one "part" is alive, so is the whole thing.

Jesus knows

Jesus knew our relationship to the Creator. So did others like him. He lived in the world of light. Shame the Romans deified him, but that's what Romans did (do?). I think it is sad you have no spiritual side and denigrate the great spiritual teachers. They all taught we have divine power when we have faith, which we do, and you can never take advantage of that. You don't get the red marbles unless you ask for them.

[Bored chemist]

I am not discussing "religion" here.

You certainly aren't discussing science.

[Origin]

Did you know you are alive?

I did and still do;

I think it is sad you have no spiritual side and denigrate the great spiritual teachers.

How do you know I have no spiritual side?  Do only Christians have a spiritual side.