The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. That CAN'T be true!
  4. Numerical perspective
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4   Go Down

Numerical perspective

  • 70 Replies
  • 24345 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline casualty (OP)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 56
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Numerical perspective
« Reply #20 on: 14/07/2021 22:11:52 »
Quote from: Petrochemicals on 14/07/2021 16:55:25
If there where 250,000 us citizens passing annually from actual legal neglegence with the compensation culture that abounds in the USA that would be a very very big expense at 10 million bucks a pop.
Evidence that "compensation culture" somehow overcomes the medical industry's practice of buying politicians?

https://www.statista.com/statistics/257364/top-lobbying-industries-in-the-us/

How much has the medical industry paid out to patients for its negligent manufacturing of the Oxycontin-addiction epidemic for profit? The medical industry pretty much got away with mass murder, no?

Logged
 



Offline casualty (OP)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 56
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Numerical perspective
« Reply #21 on: 14/07/2021 22:16:41 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 14/07/2021 16:31:47
Quote from: casualty on 14/07/2021 01:51:28
me, dying from medical-industry mistreatment
What are you being treated for? If you know the treatment is wrong, why are you continuing with it?
I feel I'm being entrapped into an ad hominem discussion about me here. First I was insulted as a "mystic", which was personal, so I defended myself (and Stanford, and Harvard and MIT for admitting me). Then I got upset when a doctor suggestion CNN is doing just fine by covering up for the medical industry as it kills 685 Americans / day, like my mother and me; so I responded with more personal info. I don't like direction I'm being taken, so I won't answer in this thread. I'm doing some high-I.Q. stuff about my health, like all my test scores show, so there's no need to worry I'm being dumb about it.
Logged
 

Offline casualty (OP)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 56
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Numerical perspective
« Reply #22 on: 14/07/2021 22:23:48 »
Quote from: Petrochemicals on 14/07/2021 16:55:25
no one can ban man's biological frailty nor litigate away his mortal nature.
straw man

you ignore the JHU's medical study, you look observe the behavior of judges and infer doctors must innocent because the judges say so. I don't share your faith in judicial scientific competence.
« Last Edit: 14/07/2021 22:32:27 by casualty »
Logged
 

Online Petrochemicals

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3629
  • Activity:
    8%
  • Thanked: 182 times
  • forum overlord
Re: Numerical perspective
« Reply #23 on: 14/07/2021 22:28:10 »
Quote from: casualty on 14/07/2021 22:23:48
Quote from: Petrochemicals on 14/07/2021 16:55:25
no one can ban man's biological frailty nor litigate away his mortal nature.
straw man
Unacceptable.
Logged
For reasons of repetitive antagonism, this user is currently not responding to messages from;
BoredChemist
To ignore someone too, go to your profile settings>modifyprofie>ignore!
 

Offline casualty (OP)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 56
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Numerical perspective
« Reply #24 on: 14/07/2021 23:55:28 »
'k
Logged
 



Online Petrochemicals

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3629
  • Activity:
    8%
  • Thanked: 182 times
  • forum overlord
Re: Numerical perspective
« Reply #25 on: 15/07/2021 00:11:52 »
Quote from: casualty on 14/07/2021 22:23:48
Quote from: Petrochemicals on 14/07/2021 16:55:25
no one can ban man's biological frailty nor litigate away his mortal nature.
straw man

you ignore the JHU's medical study, you look observe the behavior of judges and infer doctors must innocent because the judges say so. I don't share your faith in judicial scientific competence.
Being as you have added to your post what I ment in the original quote is you cannot ban the mortal nature of Mankind as several countries seemed hellbent on doing during the corona outbreak. Approximately 1 million people pass away in the UK annually from various causes yet the government does not ban sesame or eradicate the bees, it let's cars continue to drive and people to leave their houses where there are bathrooms for them to slip in.  A crap non acting doctor is not negligence anymore than an incurable disease is negligence because of lack of research funding.
« Last Edit: 15/07/2021 00:14:32 by Petrochemicals »
Logged
For reasons of repetitive antagonism, this user is currently not responding to messages from;
BoredChemist
To ignore someone too, go to your profile settings>modifyprofie>ignore!
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21136
  • Activity:
    70%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: Numerical perspective
« Reply #26 on: 15/07/2021 20:15:30 »
Quote from: casualty on 14/07/2021 22:23:48
infer doctors must innocent because the judges say so. I don't share your faith in judicial scientific competence.
Apart from a jury, there is no other arbiter of guilt in a civilised society. A Bayesian approach to competence would suggest as many innocent men are condemned as guilty men are freed.

I found it very difficult (it took nearly an hour) to demonstrate to a professional tribunal that their retained appointed expert witness was in fact a hostile amateur, and too many defence lawyers point out that a guilty plea bargain is quicker and cheaper than demolishing a government inspector on the witness stand, but the tide is turning.
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline casualty (OP)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 56
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Numerical perspective
« Reply #27 on: 15/07/2021 21:27:42 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 15/07/2021 20:15:30
Quote from: casualty on 14/07/2021 22:23:48
infer doctors must innocent because the judges say so. I don't share your faith in judicial scientific competence.
Apart from a jury, there is no other arbiter of guilt in a civilised society.
Depending on your definition of 'civilized', which is a matter of semantics. I have acted as a lawyer cross-examining expert-witness M.D. Everything, everyone stacked in the M.D.'s favor. Court records in Arizona, USA, 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, media coverage, surviving internet footprint, all say that my head pain is imaginary, and the USA was right, just, and heroic to imprison me six years for reporting it to the health department. Taken last night:


* head.png (265.01 kB, 452x453 - viewed 281 times.)
Logged
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21136
  • Activity:
    70%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: Numerical perspective
« Reply #28 on: 16/07/2021 10:52:26 »
So what is the diagnosis of what appears to be a palpable lump?
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 



Offline casualty (OP)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 56
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Numerical perspective
« Reply #29 on: 16/07/2021 19:37:05 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 16/07/2021 10:52:26
So what is the diagnosis of what appears to be a palpable lump?
plus loss of consciousness, waking up on the floor covered in my own urine; double vision; weak heartbeat; shortness of breath; light-headed; dizzy loss of balance; severe pain

"somatoform disorder" -- Mayo Clinic

"no head and neck pathology" -- Stanford

"neuralgia" -- University of Arizona / Arizona Department of Health Services / CDC

"delusions / psychosis" -- United States Department of Justice

"something... things" -- U.S. District Judge Raner Collins, as ratified by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals

https://www.dropbox.com/s/7ufunzy6nilgv39/composite.png?dl=0

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LUIuTbc95ouBefqJjwSd0M2ac5No_c3WlK7fLaP7ViY/edit?usp=sharing

My neighbors are dying at an astronomical rate, and there is an elementary school near; but that alliance above is the most powerful mafia in the world insisting violently that this is not infectious or transmissible. There's not even a lump, because it's just psychiatric. If you disagree, big problems from the group above.
« Last Edit: 16/07/2021 21:11:26 by casualty »
Logged
 

Online Petrochemicals

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3629
  • Activity:
    8%
  • Thanked: 182 times
  • forum overlord
Re: Numerical perspective
« Reply #30 on: 16/07/2021 22:22:28 »
Quote from: casualty on 16/07/2021 19:37:05
Quote from: alancalverd on 16/07/2021 10:52:26
So what is the diagnosis of what appears to be a palpable lump?
plus loss of consciousness, waking up on the floor covered in my own urine; double vision; weak heartbeat; shortness of breath; light-headed; dizzy loss of balance; severe pain

"somatoform disorder" -- Mayo Clinic

"no head and neck pathology" -- Stanford

"neuralgia" -- University of Arizona / Arizona Department of Health Services / CDC

"delusions / psychosis" -- United States Department of Justice

"something... things" -- U.S. District Judge Raner Collins, as ratified by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals

https://www.dropbox.com/s/7ufunzy6nilgv39/composite.png?dl=0

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LUIuTbc95ouBefqJjwSd0M2ac5No_c3WlK7fLaP7ViY/edit?usp=sharing

My neighbors are dying at an astronomical rate, and there is an elementary school near; but that alliance above is the most powerful mafia in the world insisting violently that this is not infectious or transmissible. There's not even a lump, because it's just psychiatric. If you disagree, big problems from the group above.

I can believe things can happen like this.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flint_water_crisis#:~:text=The%20Flint%20water%20crisis%20was,lead%20and%20possibly%20Legionella%20bacteria.

Or parasites.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4154650/#:~:text=The%20major%20neglected%20parasitic%20infections,1%5D%2C%20%5B2%5D.

Sick building syndrome with mould etc

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2796751/

These are all possible localised problems.



Logged
For reasons of repetitive antagonism, this user is currently not responding to messages from;
BoredChemist
To ignore someone too, go to your profile settings>modifyprofie>ignore!
 

Offline casualty (OP)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 56
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Numerical perspective
« Reply #31 on: 16/07/2021 23:48:01 »
Quote from: Petrochemicals on 16/07/2021 22:22:28
These are all possible localised problems.
Thanks for those interesting examples. I doubt this infectious disease is contained to any region of the U.S. My mother showed signs and then died in Washington D.C in 1985., first misdiagnosed by quack M.D.'s as mental, subsequently revised to cancer. I felt symptoms by 1988. Since then I've in college dorms, Manhattan, Brooklyn, San Diego. The disease has a component moves outside the body and can fly, so if it wants to spread to other hosts, it has the means.

The diagnoses I received are non-specific to any locale. People everywhere receive the same diagnoses I've received. Any number might have this infection.
« Last Edit: 16/07/2021 23:56:28 by casualty »
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    13.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Numerical perspective
« Reply #32 on: 17/07/2021 00:09:13 »
Quote from: casualty on 16/07/2021 19:37:05
plus loss of consciousness, waking up on the floor covered in my own urine; double vision; weak heartbeat; shortness of breath; light-headed; dizzy loss of balance; severe pain
No.
There's a difference between signs and symptoms.
I might think you are a nutcase.
But that can't explain a lump on your head.
So, if I was a doctor I'd be clearly negligent to ignore it.
What explanation have they put forward for that lump?
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



Offline casualty (OP)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 56
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Numerical perspective
« Reply #33 on: 17/07/2021 01:44:04 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 17/07/2021 00:09:13
Quote from: casualty on 16/07/2021 19:37:05
plus loss of consciousness, waking up on the floor covered in my own urine; double vision; weak heartbeat; shortness of breath; light-headed; dizzy loss of balance; severe pain
No.
There's a difference between signs and symptoms.
I studied medicine, that's how I knew there was pathology while licensed M.D.'s made lots of money denying it. I learned the diff between signs and symptoms while studying medicine. Plus, my science grades so much higher than pre-med students. I was Phi Beta Kappa. Naturally blessed with innate mental strength.
Quote
I might think you are a nutcase.
But that can't explain a lump on your head.
So, if I was a doctor I'd be clearly negligent to ignore it.
What explanation have they put forward for that lump?
They haven't paid me any damages, so they must not be negligent. There must be no lump, and you're hallucinating if you see one. I would be an idiot to care what any M.D. thinks about the lump. By 2005, I had designed and run experiments which returned chemical information about the pathogen(s). M.D.'s do not care. I would be an idiot to return to my abuser, the medical industry.

re the lump (which is a sign not a symptom), Arizona Marty Newman, M.D. asked me for a bribe, and when I refused, he testified: "She had relayed to me a history of delusional somatoform-type type issues whereby he was pursuing numerous medical doctors to explain one symptom or another."

The law gave the DOJ 30 days to determine my competence. They took a year, confining me to a DOJ hospital. re the lump, USA concludes:

"… Ten years ago … Something happened, and there’s no shame in the fact that something happened. Things happen to people all the time. … You have to learn to deal with it. People have to deal with stuff all the time. Sometimes you deal with stuff by taking [psychiatric] medication. It makes things better. …"

USA has acted at every turn like they want to catch this transmissible infectious disease and die. I can't empathize with them, they act stupid.
« Last Edit: 17/07/2021 02:12:24 by casualty »
Logged
 

Offline casualty (OP)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 56
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Numerical perspective
« Reply #34 on: 17/07/2021 02:19:10 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 17/07/2021 00:09:13
What explanation have they put forward for that lump?
Before I took over my own defense, my own lawyers were wantonly corrupt. My own lawyers tried to forcibly drug and commit me, for reporting the pain in my head, and they threatened violence against me in front of the judge, who didn't mind. They are blatant criminals:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uztw37RcMWNMx4pg4GBJy1BDnBRCAJnzMC_6JFYKpMI/pub

"I was
6 talking nicely with him, suggesting that if he gets
7 medicated, he will be fine, that there's -- I
8 didn't believe there was any evil in his spirit,
9 but he just needs medication to get away from the
10 delusional problems that he has."

Said "delusion" meaning, I was reporting the pain my head, and they call that a "delusion", and no one 2nd guesses them. The medical industry got hundreds of thousands from me and millions from the DOJ to deny there's any physical illness.
« Last Edit: 17/07/2021 02:45:18 by casualty »
Logged
 

Offline Origin

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2248
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 210 times
  • Nothing of importance
Re: Numerical perspective
« Reply #35 on: 17/07/2021 02:47:12 »
Quote from: casualty on 17/07/2021 02:19:10
Before I took over my own defense, my own lawyers were wantonly corrupt. My own lawyers tried to forcibly drug and commit me
I don't believe the DOJ, your defense team, the medical community and academia are all colluding to screw you over.  It makes no sense, it's not believable.  Maybe they were all saying the same thing because it was the truth.  You need to consider that.
Logged
 

Offline casualty (OP)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 56
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Numerical perspective
« Reply #36 on: 17/07/2021 02:54:30 »
Quote from: Origin on 17/07/2021 02:47:12
Quote from: casualty on 17/07/2021 02:19:10
Before I took over my own defense, my own lawyers were wantonly corrupt. My own lawyers tried to forcibly drug and commit me
I don't believe the DOJ, your defense team, the medical community and academia are all colluding to screw you over.  It makes no sense, it's not believable.  Maybe they were all saying the same thing because it was the truth.  You need to consider that.
What they all say is that there's no pathology. They all say that my reporting pain in my head is crazy, they all say my belief in the presence of physical pathology is crazy. That is the crazy they accused me of, not some other crazy from the DSM, but the crazy where patients reports pain & concern, and doctors deny any physical cause.

I'm not just considering that they're right. I conceded fully. There's no lump on my head, no extremely dangerous, deadly, uncontrolled, transmissible infectious disease. Seriously. Harvard, MIT, Stanford made giant mistake calling me intelligent. I do concede, no need to push the issue. No lump on my head.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1C5HH1FIvvbmht2OdOIIu1qWif3VZFhk4Z5XMztzZy-c/pub
« Last Edit: 17/07/2021 03:21:50 by casualty »
Logged
 



Offline casualty (OP)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 56
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Numerical perspective
« Reply #37 on: 17/07/2021 02:58:16 »
Quote from: Origin on 17/07/2021 02:47:12
Quote from: casualty on 17/07/2021 02:19:10
Before I took over my own defense, my own lawyers were wantonly corrupt. My own lawyers tried to forcibly drug and commit me
I don't believe the DOJ, your defense team, the medical community and academia are all colluding to screw you over.  It makes no sense, it's not believable.  Maybe they were all saying the same thing because it was the truth.  You need to consider that.
P.S.

I showed you court transcript of lawyer threatening me in courtroom, you silly joker.

 it's one thing for you to insult my intelligence on the internet like you do. I must be dumb and scientifically incompetent because all those government employees in a cartel-controlled region with lower science grades say I'm dumb, is your argument.

It's another thing to put your license on the line against me now. If you want to put a license number next to your insulting suggestion above, you end up on the witness stand, and Dr. Diaz obviously did not like it there:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/tr9m7upxd775dxp/anxiousDiaz.png?dl=0
« Last Edit: 17/07/2021 03:01:42 by casualty »
Logged
 

Offline casualty (OP)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 56
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Numerical perspective
« Reply #38 on: 17/07/2021 03:04:21 »
Quote from: Origin on 17/07/2021 02:47:12
Maybe they were all saying the same thing because it was the truth.  You need to consider that.
What about when I was elected student body president of the smartest boarding school in America? How did they all overlook my serious mental incompetence and delusions?

How did I date Vice President Gore's daughter for two years, without Secret Service or anyone suspecting I'm gravely delusional and psychotic?
Logged
 

Offline casualty (OP)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 56
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Numerical perspective
« Reply #39 on: 17/07/2021 03:13:17 »
Quote from: Origin on 17/07/2021 02:47:12
Maybe they were all saying the same thing because it was the truth.  You need to consider that.
Also David Slavit, M.D. and Randal Cohen, M.D.: They weren't psychiatrists, they were head and neck surgeons who said I needed biopsy. Slavit in 1999, but when I went to Mayo for surgery, the elderly M.D. with exhibiting dementia denied I needed a biopsy.

Cohen ordered biopsy in 2007, but before surgery, DOJ arrested me and re-diagnosed it has delusions.

Those two must be crazy, Cohen and Slavit. They're outnumbered 200 to 1.
« Last Edit: 17/07/2021 03:17:17 by casualty »
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.551 seconds with 73 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.