The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. That CAN'T be true!
  4. Numerical perspective
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4   Go Down

Numerical perspective

  • 70 Replies
  • 24162 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline casualty (OP)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 56
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Numerical perspective
« Reply #40 on: 17/07/2021 03:26:37 »
Quote from: Origin on 17/07/2021 02:47:12
Quote from: casualty on 17/07/2021 02:19:10
Before I took over my own defense, my own lawyers were wantonly corrupt. My own lawyers tried to forcibly drug and commit me
I don't believe the DOJ, your defense team, the medical community and academia are all colluding to screw you over.  It makes no sense, it's not believable.  Maybe they were all saying the same thing because it was the truth.  You need to consider that.
DOJ says I am "mentally incompetent"

9th Circuit Court of Appeals says I am "articulate and intelligent".

Stanford says: https://www.dropbox.com/s/djo04kasxxb8t7e/Stanford%20Transcript.pdf?dl=0

Where is the link to your report card, please, so I can decide how seriously to take you?

You call that "all saying the same thing". So much for the competence of your interpretation and representation of the facts.

I concede, there's no lump on the back of my head. I respect medical industry's authoritah.
« Last Edit: 17/07/2021 03:33:04 by casualty »
Logged
 



Offline casualty (OP)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 56
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Numerical perspective
« Reply #41 on: 17/07/2021 03:49:48 »
Quote from: Origin on 17/07/2021 02:47:12
Maybe they were all saying the same thing because it was the truth.  You need to consider that.
Maybe Li Wenliang and Galileo were punished because they are incompetent and deserve punishment like me. You must consider it, when you see the number and power of the people who opposed Li Wenliang and Galileo.

Since you promote authoritarianism as a replacement for science.
Logged
 

Offline casualty (OP)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 56
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Numerical perspective
« Reply #42 on: 17/07/2021 04:27:42 »
Quote from: Origin on 17/07/2021 02:47:12
I don't believe the DOJ, your defense team, the medical community and academia are all colluding to screw you over.  It makes no sense, it's not believable.  Maybe they were all saying the same thing because it was the truth.  You need to consider that.
One I had been in custody for 65 months under a coerced 18-month guilty agreement, U.S. District Judge Raner Collins said:

"I added it up, and I came up with the fact that you spent over 42 months in custody on this case, if my math is anywhere near correct, on a case where the initial guideline sentence was 18 to 24 months."

True is 65 months, but his "math" says 42 months.

>>> 65 / 42 * 100
154.76190476190476
>>>

He exhibits sub-human mathematical functioning, but he must be right about science and psychiatry because authoritarianism.
Logged
 

Offline casualty (OP)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 56
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Numerical perspective
« Reply #43 on: 17/07/2021 04:40:00 »
Quote from: Origin on 17/07/2021 02:47:12
I don't believe the DOJ, your defense team, the medical community and academia are all colluding to screw you over.  It makes no sense, it's not believable.  Maybe they were all saying the same thing because it was the truth.  You need to consider that.
Where can I see the DOJ's science grades? And my lawyer who threatened me? Where can I see M.D.'s I.Q. scores and SAT scores, measuring them against non-medical people? I asked FBI to see their science grades:

Quote
FBI:

You stupid asses maintained for six years that I am mentally incompetent. Here is my transcript:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/djo04kasxxb8t7e/Stanford%20Transcript.pdf?dl=0

Lets get your transcripts into evidence?

that's some ghetto sh-t you're into, bottom dwelling classless scum

your office can't afford to hire anyone with a transcript like mine, so they hire dumb hicks instead

U.S. Attorney in my case argued I am "mentally incompetent" because I called the Tucson federal court "a factory for processing illegal aliens". You and everyone in the world can see there's nothing incompetent about that statement; it's a description that's not even politically controversial. You don't need to study psychiatry to see that. Yet the U.S. Attorney argued that because I had uttered that 1st-Amendment-protected statement, I should lose my right to defend myself and instead be committed and forcibly drugged. So the U.S. Attorney behaved ridiculously, and your job is to enable her ridiculousness. You all acted like the evil government the U.S. has fought in war, but with the subtlety of country bumpkins.

DOJ's perjury and other lies about my health maybe were fatal to me. If you meant to commit murder, you succeeded. You saved no children, because no children ever were in danger; you murdered a scientist working on technology to compose music. Admitted early to Harvard and MIT. You fooled the public into believing my illness is imaginary, when it's obviously physical; now they're sitting ducks for an uncontrolled, transmissible, devastating infectious disease that has no respect for human life, that is your doing, you stupid dogs.

Your witness Marty Newman asked me for a bribe while "evaluating" me, testifying adversely when I refused to pay him the bribe. Instead of protecting the public from extortionist Newman, you give him money to testify, and he commits perjury. He perjured about my health, misrepresenting physical symptoms as mental. You invite that and reward it. You had tunnel vision, wanting to commit me, you weren't watching the deadly, transmissible infectious disease Newman downplayed. If you weren't retarded, and I've met you and observed that you are, if you had half an animal brain, you would oppose deadly, transmissible infectious diseases. Instead, you rolled out the carpet for it to proliferate. It's not viral or fast, it flies under the medical radar for decades. I am a scientist with honors from Stanford, admitted early to MIT and Harvard, is researched this transmissible, deadly infectious disease. You're on your own now.

Logged
 

Offline casualty (OP)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 56
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Numerical perspective
« Reply #44 on: 17/07/2021 07:48:20 »
Quote from: Origin on 17/07/2021 02:47:12
I don't believe the DOJ, your defense team, the medical community and academia are all colluding to screw you over.  It makes no sense, it's not believable.  Maybe they were all saying the same thing because it was the truth.  You need to consider that.
Is jealousy of my competence your reason for appealing to authority to insult me? You need to consider that. That would be sad. Why is your transcript kept hidden? What happened there? Why weren't you admitted to Harvard and MIT?
« Last Edit: 17/07/2021 09:05:51 by casualty »
Logged
 



Offline casualty (OP)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 56
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Numerical perspective
« Reply #45 on: 17/07/2021 08:25:39 »
60% of the five people living nearest me have died in the past two years, another getting cancer. One of them told me her doctor was great a few weeks before she died suddenly. Another thought it was strange that I do my own science rather swallowing quackery from M.D.'s with lower science aptitude than I have, but she is nothing at science, and her son maybe caught this and is very sick now.
Logged
 

Offline casualty (OP)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 56
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Numerical perspective
« Reply #46 on: 17/07/2021 09:18:09 »
Quote from: Origin on 17/07/2021 02:47:12
Maybe they were all saying the same thing because it was the truth.  You need to consider that.
Have you considered that Arizona / DOJ witness psychiatrist Dr. Christine Pletkova, M.D. had just moved from Ghana and not yet learned to speak English? Her receptive and expressive language functioning was so incompetent, she misrepresented not only my own statements to her but also professor Roosevelt's statements to her. He had to correct her misrepresentations:

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B5ZYXb_HdIQhRU1ydFlXemptUDQ/edit?resourcekey=0-m7j05mraUcYZRX6KE882mg

When you rely on her opinion, you adopt her incompetence. You deny physical pathology in view of the lump, an utter joker utterly typical of the medical industry. You love extortionist / perjurer Marty Newman, M.D. I file your opinion with other accounts operated by random, angry jokers hiding their transcripts. You appeal to authority because facts and diagnostic criteria are too complicated for you, with your transcript in hiding.
« Last Edit: 17/07/2021 10:21:33 by casualty »
Logged
 

Offline casualty (OP)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 56
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Numerical perspective
« Reply #47 on: 17/07/2021 10:30:52 »
Quote from: Origin on 17/07/2021 02:47:12
I don't believe the DOJ, your defense team, the medical community and academia are all colluding to screw you over.  It makes no sense, it's not believable.  Maybe they were all saying the same thing because it was the truth.  You need to consider that.
Newman testified:
Quote
He admitted to me during our interviews that he is a follower and a supporter of Timothy McVeigh and his ideas and ideals and actions. He had also articulated to me that he was a follower of Charles Manson as well. [That was Newman committing perjury. See Justice Black here on the danger of secret interrogations. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aG7OIPofAf-V-tW6apCQuKm_b2fSHiuiXXBhWvaCSSE/pub]

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1U3E4fqnzjMj2MHacvgpmaLEyfrOvZdG_XHdfh4szG94/edit

If you believe I am in the Manson Family, you believe Vice President Gore took a Manson family member to the Gore residence in Carthage:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/8b9vtnkbfurubgv/One%20Observatory%20Circle001.png?dl=0

I also inadvertently brought this transmissible infectious disease to the President's room at Walter Reed, but it's just psychiatric, so no worries.
« Last Edit: 17/07/2021 10:37:34 by casualty »
Logged
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21134
  • Activity:
    69%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: Numerical perspective
« Reply #48 on: 17/07/2021 10:37:04 »
I'd still be interested in a response to #28 above.
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 



Offline casualty (OP)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 56
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Numerical perspective
« Reply #49 on: 17/07/2021 11:05:14 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 17/07/2021 10:37:04
I'd still be interested in a response to #28 above.
The answer is #29. To suggest the apparently palpable lump is unrelated to 30 years of health complaints about head pain, symptoms, and signs, could not be taken seriously. I'm not going to help you figure out what it is, I've lost concern for your health. R & D is my job as a scientist, and I'm no longer willing to disclose knowledge for free. USA says it's psychiatric.
« Last Edit: 17/07/2021 11:33:24 by casualty »
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    14.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Numerical perspective
« Reply #50 on: 17/07/2021 12:36:16 »
Quote from: Origin on 17/07/2021 02:47:12
I showed you court transcript of lawyer threatening me in courtroom, you silly joker.

This
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uztw37RcMWNMx4pg4GBJy1BDnBRCAJnzMC_6JFYKpMI/pub
 is not a threat.
Nor is
Quote from: casualty on 17/07/2021 02:19:10
"I was
6 talking nicely with him, suggesting that if he gets
7 medicated, he will be fine, that there's -- I
8 didn't believe there was any evil in his spirit,
9 but he just needs medication to get away from the
10 delusional problems that he has."

Could it be that the delusion they were talking about was the belief that you had been threatened when you were not?

And it doesn't help your "case" when we look at the transcript which says
 "MR. KNEIP: Your Honor, there was a little
18 -- a few insults from my client, and I -- I did say
19 that, and I would apologize to the Court for that,
20 but not to him.
21 I have taken insults from him, as you
22 might suspect, long enough, and these today, being
23 called a clown and the rest of it I wouldn't repeat
24 in open court, but -- I think it's true that Mr. --
25 I expect to be done with this case after today, or
2
Case 4:07-cr-01838-RCC-BPV Document 274 Filed 08/19/11 Page 2 of 6

1 at least I hope so.
2 I think he's pushed it so far that even
3 with my 37 years I can't put up with this guy
4 anymore. I do have limits that I would react to
5 anybody's speech, and this man needs to be -- I was
6 talking nicely with him, suggesting that if he gets
7 medicated, he will be fine, that there's -- I
8 didn't believe there was any evil in his spirit,
9 but he just needs medication to get away from the
10 delusional problems that he has.
11 And he, of course, told me he has nothing
12 delusional, it's all me. Well -
-"
« Last Edit: 17/07/2021 12:40:10 by Bored chemist »
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline Colin2B

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6476
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 708 times
Re: Numerical perspective
« Reply #51 on: 17/07/2021 15:09:43 »
This thread contains a large number of unsubstantiated claims, and is no longer relevant to the Covid19 section.
Logged
and the misguided shall lead the gullible,
the feebleminded have inherited the earth.
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21134
  • Activity:
    69%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: Numerical perspective
« Reply #52 on: 17/07/2021 16:13:44 »
"Somatoform disorder" is at least descriptive - a posh lump! - but hardly counts as a diagnosis. The rest seem like weak guesses at possible causes of your other symptoms. Has nobody actually biopsied, CT'd or MRI'd the lump on your neck? Not my job to make the diagnosis, but I 'm happy to sell the kit that others use to do so!
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 



Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    14.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Numerical perspective
« Reply #53 on: 17/07/2021 18:35:06 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 17/07/2021 16:13:44
"Somatoform disorder" is at least descriptive
Yes it's more or less synonymous with the description "psychosomatic".
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline casualty (OP)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 56
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Numerical perspective
« Reply #54 on: 17/07/2021 19:13:36 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 17/07/2021 12:36:16
This
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uztw37RcMWNMx4pg4GBJy1BDnBRCAJnzMC_6JFYKpMI/pub
 is not a threat.
What is your law license number? How much threat case-law do you know?
Logged
 

Offline casualty (OP)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 56
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Numerical perspective
« Reply #55 on: 17/07/2021 19:25:21 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 17/07/2021 16:13:44
"Somatoform disorder" is at least descriptive - a posh lump! - but hardly counts as a diagnosis. The rest seem like weak guesses at possible causes of your other symptoms. Has nobody actually biopsied, CT'd or MRI'd the lump on your neck? Not my job to make the diagnosis, but I 'm happy to sell the kit that others use to do so!
Like any mental diagnosis, the DSM includes a specific section on "Somatoform disorder", and DSM defines the condition in terms of several diagnostic criteria. The term has a technical meaning. I know it, because I've studied the pertinent medicine and law. My education in cognitive science gives me an additional legal upper hand against adverse lawyers and doctors. I wouldn't hesitate to sue any doctor who made that diagnosis, and I would be comfortable cross-examining him personally, and the 9th Circuit already confirms I'm good at law.

Pharmaceutical corporations charge trillions for the fruits of their labor, and their transcripts aren't as good as mine. I'm going to try that model now, since being a great person all my life only got me in trouble with the medical industry and U.S. government.

The cause of the lump is extremely dangerous. You need my help, but my help just became extremely expensive.
« Last Edit: 17/07/2021 19:28:22 by casualty »
Logged
 

Offline casualty (OP)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 56
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Numerical perspective
« Reply #56 on: 17/07/2021 19:40:58 »
Quote from: Colin2B on 17/07/2021 15:09:43
This thread contains a large number of unsubstantiated claims, and is no longer relevant to the Covid19 section.
I see it's gone off topic, so I understand the forum move.

I don't see any claims that are unsubstantiated from me. Please specify any claims I've made need substantiation, so I can substantiate them? The Washington Post reports here about my past work as a newspaper publisher, and the Post notes that I was advised by Brit Hume and Donald Graham. My mother was a journalist for the Washington Post. I know all about claims, falseness, truth, libel, defamation.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/18_uYFjEbErtbxFUVo-Z7GLKVsXfDkhW3/view?usp=sharing

I'd like to substantiate any claims that need it, if you'll please specify them.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/18_uYFjEbErtbxFUVo-Z7GLKVsXfDkhW3/view?usp=sharing

Logged
 



Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    14.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Numerical perspective
« Reply #57 on: 17/07/2021 19:44:41 »
Quote from: casualty on 17/07/2021 19:13:36
Quote from: Bored chemist on 17/07/2021 12:36:16
This
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uztw37RcMWNMx4pg4GBJy1BDnBRCAJnzMC_6JFYKpMI/pub
 is not a threat.
What is your law license number? How much threat case-law do you know?
You rather miss the point.
I don't need to be a lawyer, just a potential juror.
Quote from: casualty on 17/07/2021 19:25:21
My education in cognitive science gives me an additional legal upper hand against adverse lawyers and doctors.
No, it clearly does not.
That's why you spent so long detained.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline casualty (OP)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 56
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Numerical perspective
« Reply #58 on: 17/07/2021 21:01:09 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 17/07/2021 19:44:41
That's why you spent so long detained.
Not once I became my own lawyer, I did not. I became less cordial with the judge,

https://www.dropbox.com/s/qnu68tudzu8dkkb/recording002.png?dl=0

and went home soon after.
« Last Edit: 17/07/2021 21:06:27 by casualty »
Logged
 

Offline casualty (OP)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 56
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Numerical perspective
« Reply #59 on: 17/07/2021 21:04:40 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 17/07/2021 12:36:16
MR. KNEIP
Here's more about that unethical, professionally incompetent lawyer:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5ZYXb_HdIQhU1pfWDJqakdKRTg/view?usp=sharing&resourcekey=0-PgUZUxczN4ZVMTVeoaZAlw

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1d7wcL3vj-_033bOilZvCkGJf0Gil37WHe-8tjNlCYDA/pub
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 2.122 seconds with 70 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.