[Origin]

Simply put, antimatter represents the lifeless side of Schrödinger's paradox.

That is not correct.

More seriously. I presume from the start of an anti big bang.

What is an anti big bang?

During a high-energy collision, the particle pair annihilation detects the presence of antimatter through space-time.

That makes no sense.  You are saying a particle/antiparticle annihilation detects antimatter!  How can an annihilation detect something??

Origin, you will understand that during the movement of the particle and for my oscillator an alternation between potential energy and kinetic energy is done every quarter cycle.

I realize that you are talking about simple harmonic motion that can be seen in a pendulum or in a thought experiment where a mass is dropped into a shaft through the earth.  This is just high school level physics.

[Kartazion (OP)]

What is an anti big bang?

Our universe has antimatter partner on the other side of the Big Bang, say physicists

That makes no sense.  You are saying a particle/antiparticle annihilation detects antimatter!  How can an annihilation detect something??

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron-positron_annihilation

I realize that you are talking about simple harmonic motion that can be seen in a pendulum or in a thought experiment where a mass is dropped into a shaft through the earth.  This is just high school level physics.

You realize a little late. Yes simple harmonic oscillator. Level 101. So why make a lot of it?

[Bored chemist]

Yes simple harmonic oscillator. Level 101. So why make a lot of it?

You started a whole thread about it.
You also seem to be adding some nonsense about antimatter.

Why do you keep doing that?

[Kartazion (OP)]

You started a whole thread about it.

And who's pretending not to understand for having written so many pages for a simple oscillator?

You also seem to be adding some nonsense about antimatter.

Why do you keep doing that?

In your opinion where antimatter is?

[Bored chemist]

And who's pretending not to understand for having written so many pages for a simple oscillator?

You.

I pointed out that it was a trivial system ages ago.

If you drilled a hole through the axis of the Earth from pole to pole, and put a long thin vacuum chamber in it then dropped an object into one end of that chamber , it would fall down the hole, picking up speed.
And it would be moving very fast when it reached the centre of the Earth so it would carry on going until it reached the other pole where it would stop, and then fall back down again
It would "bounce" back and to .
If the density of the Earth was constant (rather than increasing as you go down). the body would exhibit  simple harmonic motion.

As it did so, it would exchange potential for kinetic energy.
And so you could write that the gravitational potential energy - the kinetic energy =0


But it's not a very interesting system (and, of course, it's impossible).

I wonder if it's what the OP is on about.

You are still trying to pretend that it's something to do with antimatter.

[Kartazion (OP)]

You are still trying to pretend that it's something to do with antimatter.

Trying to pretend that it's something to do with antimatter? Fortunately. Antimatter is an integral part of physics. So yes, placing it in the model is essential. As you do not know where the antimatter is located, then my explanation seems inevitably wrong to you.

[Origin]

Our universe has antimatter partner on the other side of the Big Bang, say physicists

This site cannot be reached.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron-positron_annihilation

I know what electron positron annihilation is, but this is nonsense:
"During a high-energy collision, the particle pair annihilation detects the presence of antimatter through space-time"

You realize a little late. Yes simple harmonic oscillator. Level 101. So why make a lot of it?

You seem to be trying to make a lot of it, but so far you have failed to do so.

[Origin]

Antimatter is an integral part of physics. So yes, placing it in the model is essential.

Antimatter has nothing to do with simple harmonic motion.

As you do not know where the antimatter is located, then my explanation seems inevitably wrong to you

What are you talking about?  That makes no sense.

[Bored chemist]

As you do not know where the antimatter is located,

There is essentially no antimatter anywhere on Earth  or within a billion miles of it.

[Kartazion (OP)]

Antimatter has nothing to do with simple harmonic motion.

Can you explain why?

As you do not know where the antimatter is located,

There is essentially no antimatter anywhere on Earth  or within a billion miles of it.

So I ask my question again. Where are you located antimatter in the universe?

[Kartazion (OP)]

Our universe has antimatter partner on the other side of the Big Bang, say physicists

This site cannot be reached.

https://physicsworld.com/a/our-universe-has-antimatter-partner-on-the-other-side-of-the-big-bang-say-physicists/

[Bored chemist]

Our universe has antimatter partner on the other side of the Big Bang, say physicists

This site cannot be reached.

https://physicsworld.com/a/our-universe-has-antimatter-partner-on-the-other-side-of-the-big-bang-say-physicists/

Did you not understand the 3rd and 4th words of that article?
It starts "Our universe could be..."

Quote from: Origin on Today at 14:00:08
Antimatter has nothing to do with simple harmonic motion.
Can you explain why?

That's not his job.
If you say they are related, it is your responsibility to show that they are.

[Origin]

Antimatter has nothing to do with simple harmonic motion.

Can you explain why?

For the same reason that a Buffy-tufted marmoset or a nimbostratus cloud have nothing to do with simple harmonic motion.

So I ask my question again. Where are you located antimatter in the universe?

There is almost no antimatter in the universe.  Antimatter is produced all the time but almost all of that is immediately annihilated by matter.  Where do you think it is?

[Kartazion (OP)]

Antimatter has nothing to do with simple harmonic motion.

As usual, you are wrong.

Did you not understand the 3rd and 4th words of that article?
It starts "Our universe could be..."

My oscillator could be a perfect example to explain how the universe works.

That's not his job.
If you say they are related, it is your responsibility to show that they are.

His job is to contradict without explaining why? Origin is not a real physicist.

For the same reason that a Buffy-tufted marmoset or a nimbostratus cloud have nothing to do with simple harmonic motion.

You are ridiculous.

Observing Matter-Antimatter Oscillations

There is almost no antimatter in the universe.  Antimatter is produced all the time but almost all of that is immediately annihilated by matter.  Where do you think it is?

I have already answered that. On the other side of the big bang. In the antiuniverse.

[Kartazion (OP)]

Origin, to prove to you that you're not up to date: https://www.innovationnewsnetwork.com/evidence-of-particles-oscillating-between-matter-and-antimatter/12418/

[Kartazion (OP)]

Here is a model that I presented several years ago:

[Bored chemist]

OK, here's the (first) bit you didn't understand:
"D-mesons are the fourth in a quartet of neutral mesons to be observed oscillating into their antiparticle partners."
The critical bit is the word "neutral".
You can't do that with charged particles like the electrons and positrons in your picture. The charge can't "disapear" and then reverse itself.

Also, the oscillation is anything by simple harmonic.

[Bored chemist]

Quote from: Origin on Today at 13:30:44
For the same reason that a Buffy-tufted marmoset or a nimbostratus cloud have nothing to do with simple harmonic motion.
You are ridiculous.

No, his criticism is perfectly reasonable.

As usual, you are wrong.

His job is to contradict without explaining why?

Well, you contradicted him and  didn't explain why he's wrong (you can't have done so; he is right) why shouldn't he?

[Bored chemist]

Fundamentally, you need to accept the way science works.
If you say " there is a link between antimatter oscillations and gravitational oscillations of a particle falling through a hole in the centre of the Earth" without saying why, and without showing evidence, you will get laughed at.

It isn't anyone else's job to show that you are wrong.
It is your responsibility to show that you are right.

You have not done so.

[Kartazion (OP)]

OK, here's the (first) bit you didn't understand:
"D-mesons are the fourth in a quartet of neutral mesons to be observed oscillating into their antiparticle partners."
The critical bit is the word "neutral".
You can't do that with charged particles like the electrons and positrons in your picture. The charge can't "disapear" and then reverse itself.

Also, the oscillation is anything by simple harmonic.

Meson–antimeson oscillations have also formed essential ingredients in the discovery of CP violation, a delicate, yet profound feature of our universe. These phenomena have been crucial for the evolution of the Standard Model of high energy physics and have more recently provided impressive validation for its CKM dynamics. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230956960_Matter-antimatter_oscillations_and_CP_violation_as_manifested_through_quantum_mysteries

PS: CKM means Cabibbo–Kobayashi–Maskawa https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa_matrix

The meson is a hadron just like the proton or neutron. This means that it is valid for all particles subjected to the CP violation. Quantum chromodynamics is a perfect example of what I might call the oscillation of a single quark between two or three positions.

My picture is a derivative of the Feynman diagram which works very well with charges.

Here is an old model that I made: