[Kartazion (OP)]

...As you move to the right (in the +X direction)...  As you move to the left (in the -X direction) ...

It is the direction of movement of the particle with the sign + or - following x which is interesting. Now pair it with the value of + or - of x with the sign of the electric charge of the particle. The antimatter and the matter is represented by this sign of the electric charge. For information in quantum mechanic the harmonic oscillator also has negative eigenvalues of the Hamiltonian.

[Origin]

It is the direction of movement of the particle with the sign + or - following x which is interesting.

That makes absolutely no sense.  A particles charge and direction have nothing to do with what we are discussing.  The graph in question has nothing to do with charge.
 

Now pair it with the value of + or - of x with the sign of the electric charge of the particle.

That has nothing to do with the graph we are discussing.

The antimatter and the matter is represented by this sign of the electric charge.

Again that has nothing to do with what we were talking about.

For information in quantum mechanic the harmonic oscillator also has negative eigenvalues of the Hamiltonian.

Learn some basic physics, don't just string together terms you don't understand.

[Bored chemist]

Click the following link to see what it gives:

It gives a bad animation of something we already know about.
But it doesn't say anything about antimatter or QM.

It is easy to get back an answer to you. Between Origin repeating what I say like a child, and you who say 'Something we already know about' for my animation. Once again and as usual. You will be able to provide a link of what you say. I give you a possibility to provide me with a diagram similar to mine in force as you claim.

You didn't say anything about antimatter in that animation.

[Kartazion (OP)]

That makes absolutely no sense.  A particles charge and direction have nothing to do with what we are discussing. 

The type of charge of a particle determines the direction in which the particles will be deflected in a magnetic field such that the negatively charged particles will go toward the positive end of the magnetic field while positively charged particles will go toward the negative end.

You didn't say anything about antimatter in that animation.

So where's the problem?

[Bored chemist]

What you need to provide is a real explanation which says .
"Antimatter/ matter oscillation  and gravitational oscillation are linked because..."
Just fill in where I left the ... .
Unless you are providing an explanation like that, you are not doing science, you are just wasting time.

[Bored chemist]

So where's the problem?

The problem is that you can't say the video explains your ideas about antimatter when the video doesn't even mention antimatter.

[Kartazion (OP)]

So where's the problem?

The problem is that you can't say the video explains your ideas about antimatter when the video doesn't even mention antimatter.

I mention the antiparticle in the video.

"Antimatter/ matter oscillation  and gravitational oscillation are linked because...

Antimatter/ matter oscillation  and gravitational oscillation are linked because the sign changes way. Of course the matter and the antimatter are subject to gravity.

[Bored chemist]

Antimatter/ matter oscillation  and gravitational oscillation are linked because the sign changes way.

But that's a property of any oscillation; it goes forward, then it goes backward.
You will have to do much better than that.

What you need to provide is a real explanation which says .
"Antimatter/ matter oscillation  and gravitational oscillation are linked because..."
Just fill in where I left the ... .
Unless you are providing an explanation like that, you are not doing science, you are just wasting time.

[Kartazion (OP)]

But that's a property of any oscillation; it goes forward, then it goes backward.
You will have to do much better than that.

A copy paste will do.

Physicists have proved that a subatomic particle can switch into its antiparticle alter-ego and back again, in a new discovery revealed today. An extraordinarily precise measurement made by Oxford researchers using the LHCb experiment at CERN has provided the first evidence that charm mesons can change into their antiparticle and back again.

[Bored chemist]

I can only assume that you are being deliberately stupid.

The population of mice in the UK oscillates with a period of 1 year.

The sales of Christmas ornaments also varies with a period of 1 year.

But mice do not cause Christmas.

[Bored chemist]

A copy paste will do.

A copy paste would do, if it was relavant.

You keep saying two things.
Thing 1 Particles oscillate
Thing 2 a rock dropped through the centre of the earth would oscillate

But that is not the same as saying that thing 1 causes thing 2.
A bee's wings oscillate, but that isn't the explanation of antimatter.

[Origin]

The type of charge of a particle determines the direction in which the particles will be deflected in a magnetic field such that the negatively charged particles will go toward the positive end of the magnetic field while positively charged particles will go toward the negative end.

We weren't discussing charged particles or electric fields at all, we were discussing a harmonic motion due to gravity!  Why would you start talking about that?  Could you focus so we could move forward at least a little bit?!

[Kartazion (OP)]

I can only assume that you are being deliberately stupid.

I don't see how stupid this is. Or we don't have the same definition of stupid. I'm giving you a link on the particle oscillation between matter and antimatter. The only way out is that you have to publicly renounce the veracity of the published paper, to make me believe that I am wrong.

The population of mice in the UK oscillates with a period of 1 year.

The sales of Christmas ornaments also varies with a period of 1 year.

But mice do not cause Christmas.

Here we can see that you studied.

A bee's wings oscillate, but that isn't the explanation of antimatter.

Do you reproach me for not explaining why antimatter exists?

We weren't discussing charged particles or electric fields at all

Absurd. You are beside the point yourself. When we talk about of the electric charge of a particle, we talk about of antimatter.

... we were discussing a harmonic motion due to gravity!

I do not see the relationship with the oscillator and gravity which is already very well studied.

Could you focus so we could move forward at least a little bit?!

Can you you focus?

[Origin]

Do you reproach me for not explaining why antimatter exists?

Absurd. You are beside the point yourself. When we talk about of the electric charge of a particle, we talk about of antimatter.

I do not see the relationship with the oscillator and gravity which is already very well studied.

Well this is hopeless.

[Kartazion (OP)]

Well this is hopeless.

You don't understand the link between gravity and oscillator?

You don't understand the connection between electric charge and antimatter?

You're done.

[pzkpfw]

Well this is hopeless.

You don't understand the link between gravity and oscillator?

You don't understand the connection between electric charge and antimatter?

You're done.

You start with "2 + 3 = 5"

Then jump to "banana + happy = purple"

And people ask "how did you get to 'purple'?"

And you say "but but but all these experts say 2 + 3 = 5!"

[Kartazion (OP)]

You start with "2 + 3 = 5"

Then jump to "banana + happy = purple"

And people ask "how did you get to 'purple'?"

And you say "but but but all these experts say 2 + 3 = 5!"

Why make an analogy like this when real terms are used?

Origin and Bored refute the idea of ​​an oscillation between matter and antimatter as scientists have discovered and explained it through mesons. That's it.

[Bored chemist]

I don't see how stupid this is.

I think we should leave it there.

[Origin]

Origin and Bored refute the idea of ​​an oscillation between matter and antimatter as scientists have discovered and explained it through mesons.

This is a prime example of why it is impossible to have a meaningful discussion you.
1.  The language barrier:  You mean reject, not refute.
2.  You lie:  Neither of us have denied that a charm meson can switch between matter and antimatter.
3.  You make wild assertions:  You think all matter acts like a charm meson.   

[Kartazion (OP)]

I don't see how stupid this is.

I think we should leave it there.

Yes I understand. It's because once again you are unable to say why.

You lie:  Neither of us have denied that a charm meson can switch between matter and antimatter.

Why use the word 'switch' when they use the word 'oscillation'? Look at your next message: who is the liar in the story?

Antimatter has nothing to do with simple harmonic motion.

You make wild assertions:  You think all matter acts like a charm meson.   

And? It's not?