The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Can someone mine 102 tons of coal in 5 hours and 45 minutes w/ 1935 technology?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Can someone mine 102 tons of coal in 5 hours and 45 minutes w/ 1935 technology?

  • 23 Replies
  • 9417 Views
  • 3 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline nicephotog

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 482
  • Activity:
    1%
  • Thanked: 11 times
  • [ censored ]
Re: Can someone mine 102 tons of coal in 5 hours and 45 minutes w/ 1935 technology?
« Reply #20 on: 30/09/2021 10:59:04 »
{ edited I misread that.....

That's 20 tons P/hour, and presuming a standard ton (all similar imperial , SAE or ?Soviet) not short ton or long ton or tonne , it would be around or less than one cubic metre 1x1x1 and twenty volumes of this P/hour.

"Possible" with a pick and enough air for the miner but mainly space to swing in without worrying they would kill anyone else !
This last point (space to swing) apart a vein good enough to get that much from (with a double ended pick and a wide enough path inside a vein you can swing back on the other wall side)  is probably the biggest factor.
But of essence, what does "mined" mean, when is that point achieved e.g. at the surface,? in the truck?
Note: a 44 gallon drum of water weighs 213kg - forklift license info

What do you actually want with it?
Are you trying to incite coal mining Olympics as an event?

Remains just possible(since the assessing my reading error)
« Last Edit: 30/09/2021 11:28:32 by nicephotog »
Logged
How To Tutorial (all Java servers) HttpOutPutTools (port to .jar Hell Pig Entelodont) 2nd November 2022
https://1drv.ms/u/c/9841b77e61824484/EUuxfLoCHP9MpN62Kt8hwLEBpcAc3mxG-r3gwtpEIaB_VA
 



Offline Petrochemicals

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3629
  • Activity:
    7%
  • Thanked: 182 times
  • forum overlord
Re: Can someone mine 102 tons of coal in 5 hours and 45 minutes w/ 1935 technology?
« Reply #21 on: 01/10/2021 15:16:41 »
Quote from: nicephotog on 30/09/2021 10:59:04

That's 20 tons P/hour, and presuming a standard ton (all similar imperial , SAE or ?Soviet) not short ton or long ton or tonne , it would be around or less than one cubic metre 1x1x1 and twenty volumes of this P/hour.
Half a metre square. Ie 0.5x1x1. Favourable coal all you would really need to do would be to stick a pick behind it.

Coal is a broad term, jade is in fact coal but I would think it was harder to mine.
Logged
For reasons of repetitive antagonism, this user is currently not responding to messages from;
BoredChemist
To ignore someone too, go to your profile settings>modifyprofie>ignore!
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31102
  • Activity:
    11%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Can someone mine 102 tons of coal in 5 hours and 45 minutes w/ 1935 technology?
« Reply #22 on: 01/10/2021 18:15:06 »
Quote from: Petrochemicals on 01/10/2021 15:16:41
Coal is a broad term, jade is in fact coal
I presume you mean jet.
I can see why you might identify with jade; it's tough to get through, green and dense.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline nicephotog

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 482
  • Activity:
    1%
  • Thanked: 11 times
  • [ censored ]
Re: Can someone mine 102 tons of coal in 5 hours and 45 minutes w/ 1935 technology?
« Reply #23 on: 03/10/2021 10:14:31 »
Quote
[Half a metre square. Ie 0.5x1x1. Favourable coal all you would really need to do would be to stick a pick behind it.

One problem there is Soviet diet in the 1930s , it apparently was short of meat and mainly was for some mostly Corn.
How much rice was ever their diet is neither understood but it wasn't ever traditional protein intake at any one rate.
More than that the Five ears of corn law would have been heavily serviced at that time so a wonder about miners diets.
« Last Edit: 03/10/2021 10:24:50 by nicephotog »
Logged
How To Tutorial (all Java servers) HttpOutPutTools (port to .jar Hell Pig Entelodont) 2nd November 2022
https://1drv.ms/u/c/9841b77e61824484/EUuxfLoCHP9MpN62Kt8hwLEBpcAc3mxG-r3gwtpEIaB_VA
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: coal  / mining  / efficiency 
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.878 seconds with 31 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.