0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
What do you think?
I think it's meaningless.
Can a balance of electric and gravitational forces be achieved?
What are you trying to use it for?
I think this is another example of you coming up with an incorrect conjecture based on ignorance of physics and science in general.
Yes.I am sat on a chair, the forces that hold the chair together and thereby hold me up are essentially electrical.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 07/12/2021 13:52:35What are you trying to use it for?Sorry. I meant retraction. Please, can a moderator correct my title? Thank you.
If electrostatics hold atoms together, then the gravitational field envelops the earth's electric field,
What are you using the word to mean?
The Earth barely has an electric field.
Gravity still works inside a faraday cage.
None of your ideas is making any sense.
It means a reduction of the area.
It corresponds to the quantity of matter.
Be the air.
More matter you have, more field you will have.
Possible.
this is another example of you coming up with an incorrect conjecture based on ignorance of physics and science in general.
Quote from: Origin on 07/12/2021 14:18:28this is another example of you coming up with an incorrect conjecture based on ignorance of physics and science in general. You should stop + learn some science, rather than cluttering up this site with rubbish.
well known electrogravitics is
Quote from: Bored chemist on 07/12/2021 18:43:59Quote from: Origin on 07/12/2021 14:18:28this is another example of you coming up with an incorrect conjecture based on ignorance of physics and science in general. You should stop + learn some science, rather than cluttering up this site with rubbish.Why do you react like this when it comes to just chatting?
Quote from: Kartazion on 07/12/2021 20:48:49well known electrogravitics is wrong.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrogravitics#Criticism
Because this is a discussion forum, not a chat forum.
Why are you so determined to be wrong?
In this context, chatting or discus is the same thing, isn't it?
Wrong about what?
Essentially everything you posted.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 07/12/2021 21:15:45Essentially everything you posted.I don't believe you.