The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. General Discussion & Feedback
  3. Radio Show & Podcast Feedback
  4. Missed gravity question?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Missed gravity question?

  • 8 Replies
  • 9605 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mrguido (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 2
  • Activity:
    0%
Missed gravity question?
« on: 14/06/2007 22:23:20 »
I noticed that in when the question about the stone falling through the center of the Earth was addressed, half of the question seemed to be missed. I understood the question as centering around *two* stones meeting simultaneously. If the hole was all the way through, and stones were dropped from both ends and they met in the middle, what would happen? I think the question is akin to asking about the nature of gravity at the very center of the Earth.
My guess is that if they were smashed to bits then the bits would fall upwards towards the mass of the Earth.
Did anybody else hear the question this way?
Logged
 



paul.fr

  • Guest
Missed gravity question?
« Reply #1 on: 14/06/2007 22:37:06 »
Welcome Mrguido
which show are you refering to? I have not yet listened to last sundays show, was it that one?
Logged
 

Offline Batroost

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 276
  • Activity:
    0%
  • There's no such thing as a dirty atom!
Missed gravity question?
« Reply #2 on: 14/06/2007 23:07:16 »
Quote
My guess is that if they were smashed to bits then the bits would fall upwards towards the mass of the Earth.

No - inside a solid ball the net gravitational force is still always towards the centre.
Logged
Never express yourself more clearly than you are able to think.
 

paul.fr

  • Guest
Missed gravity question?
« Reply #3 on: 14/06/2007 23:12:05 »
am i right in remembering that the "trip" would take 42 minutes and a few seconds?
Logged
 

Offline mrguido (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 2
  • Activity:
    0%
Missed gravity question?
« Reply #4 on: 15/06/2007 20:06:12 »
I don't remember the exact time, but 42 minutes sounds about right. I also don't remember the exact show, but I think it was about two weeks ago (I listen on the podcast and don't always get to them right away).
I thought that maybe the Earth's density would be uneven enough (because of different layers or maybe pockets of different materials) to cause gravity to pull one way or the other.
Thanks for the response!
Logged
 



paul.fr

  • Guest
Missed gravity question?
« Reply #5 on: 15/06/2007 20:09:21 »
Quote from: mrguido on 15/06/2007 20:06:12
I don't remember the exact time, but 42 minutes sounds about right. I also don't remember the exact show, but I think it was about two weeks ago (I listen on the podcast and don't always get to them right away).
I thought that maybe the Earth's density would be uneven enough (because of different layers or maybe pockets of different materials) to cause gravity to pull one way or the other.
Thanks for the response!


try searching or wikipedia for: gravity train, don't know why but i always want to write gravy train.
Logged
 

paul.fr

  • Guest
Missed gravity question?
« Reply #6 on: 15/06/2007 20:10:21 »
here is the wiki link:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity_train
Logged
 

Offline Batroost

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 276
  • Activity:
    0%
  • There's no such thing as a dirty atom!
Missed gravity question?
« Reply #7 on: 15/06/2007 21:48:47 »
The other thing this Wicki article neglects to mention is the Coriolis force. On many sub-surface trajectories the gravity train would be subject to an apparent sideways force as well; actually just due to moving in a rotating frame of reference.

I remember this featured in one Sci-Fi story as a reason why the tunnel had to be stronger on one side than the other!
Logged
Never express yourself more clearly than you are able to think.
 

paul.fr

  • Guest
Missed gravity question?
« Reply #8 on: 15/06/2007 21:59:22 »
Quote from: Batroost on 15/06/2007 21:48:47
The other thing this Wicki article neglects to mention is the Coriolis force. On many sub-surface trajectories the gravity train would be subject to an apparent sideways force as well; actually just due to moving in a rotating frame of reference.

I remember this featured in one Sci-Fi story as a reason why the tunnel had to be stronger on one side than the other!

Interesting, i never thought of or heard that before.
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.209 seconds with 46 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.