0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
. Russia is ultimately not the exception to this rebellion, because many nations and by force of events 'unite it'..
?
" What If " Russia uses a similar logic & decides to use Tactical Nuclear Weapons in hopes of ending the war sooner, or if they use an EMP Bomb n take out electronic devices only, with less to no civilian casualties...Would then NATO jump into an all out Direct conflict with Russia?OrWould the US then openly use nukes against Russia or it's Allies?
The US nuked Japan to prevent heavy casualties,
What the nuclear attack demonstrated was the ability to destroy any target with a single aircraft and at very low risk to the attacker. Even the Japanese military recognised the old adage that it is no disgrace to surrender to obviously superior forces.
The Ukrainian question is what would Putin achieve with a nuclear attack?
Superiority of allied forces was there from Midway onwards,
Quote from: Petrochemicals on 09/10/2022 19:38:58Superiority of allied forces was there from Midway onwards,So why did it take 3 years for one of the world's most sophisticated military and intelligence organisations, that had been planning and building for decades, to realise they couldn't win?
As we can see one day this is said and the next day they change their minds. At this diplomatic level, the interpretation of indecisive speeches underlines a certain uncertainty of how to react and is ultimately a form of panic.
P.S. - When a Commie keeps sayin Use of Nukes is Real & No Bluff, & when the POTUS refers to Armageddon, i won't consider those who Panic to be Fools. ☢️
Were their plans based on the idea that their Emperor was a God?