The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. General Discussion & Feedback
  3. Just Chat!
  4. Occam's razor, what most likely happened to Amelia Earhart?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Occam's razor, what most likely happened to Amelia Earhart?

  • 1 Replies
  • 1187 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Pseudoscience-is-malarkey (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 940
  • Activity:
    1.5%
  • Thanked: 32 times
Occam's razor, what most likely happened to Amelia Earhart?
« on: 24/06/2022 14:10:36 »
Is what caused her twin-engine Lockheed Electra to crash most likely bad navigation when negotiating the unpredictable ocean waters? Aviation was still in its infancy in 1937.
Logged
 



Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21162
  • Activity:
    63.5%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: Occam's razor, what most likely happened to Amelia Earhart?
« Reply #1 on: 24/06/2022 18:12:05 »
Hardly infancy. The first flight from England  to Australia was in 1919, by which time at least one war had been fought with fighters and bombers.

Nothing particularly unpredictable about the Pacific ocean (essentially, buggerall chance of survival if you hit it in any kind of  airplane) but it is VERY BIG so a small headwind can result in ending up hundreds of miles short of your planned destination even if you were pointing in the right direction. Also VERY EMPTY so little chance of getting a credible enroute weather report even if your surface station radio is working. And

Quote
Earhart's transmissions seemed to indicate she and Noonan believed they had reached Howland's charted position, which was incorrect by about five nautical miles (10 km).

So their navigation may have been perfect but the chart was wrong, and they were certainly short of fuel at the time of their last known radio contact, when they said they were tracking north and south at 1000 ft in scattered low cloud looking for Howland island.
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.226 seconds with 26 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.