0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
your God-eating Colin doesn't exist.
So, the basis on which you say he doesn't exist, is the Google found him.
Don’t bank on it, he just hasn’t revealed himself yet
. And this thread says it doesn't exist 'cause you made up this story.
Have you not realised yet?You are trying to push a story that is "made up" by bronze age goat herders.
Please give me a source on Colin
I'm proving you wrong because your story about Colin eating Gods doesn't exist.
Here's your story, translated from (or at least by) Ancient Hebrew to give it credence.
In the beginning was a butterfly who laid an egg that turned into a caterpillar that ate deities. It was a very hungry caterpillar [note "The Very Hungry Caterpillar" is a well-known and respected holey book for children] so he ate all the possible deities, then pupated, turned into a butterfly, and flew away.
The extraordinary thing about lepidoptera is that no recognisable anatomy persists from the caterpillar to the adult, therefore the nonexistence of Colin in the present does not preclude the possibility of his existence in the past.
That particualr fallacy is just "proof by assertion".It won't work on a science page.Try making your point like a grown-up rather thanhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_the_stone
You translated from a document that does not exist.
No source from the past speaks of an analogy of a caterpillar eating gods.
Let's see your proof of the nonexistence of my source document, please.
That is a source from the past, ...
..., and it is more credible than Genesis verse 21.
The Bible is the most read book in the world.
Your story of Colin the caterpillar who eats Gods does not exist.
So you make up a story about some Colin who eats Gods, and I have to prove he doesn't exist?
Can you give me the source of your past document? You can not... That's the proof.
How could Alan translate something that doesn't exist?
Proof of what?