[Kartazion]

my working theory.

Your theory should also be able to explain at least all of this:

- Hawking Radiation
- Quantum entanglement
- Quantum superposition
- Quantum Vacuum and Vacuum Energy
- Quantum chromodynamics
- Quark
- Gluon
- Neutrino
- Antimatter
- CPT symmetry
- Supersymmetry
- Schrödinger's paradox
- Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle
- Time dilation
- Dark Energy
- Gravity
- Tunnel effect
- Electromagnetic wave
- Weak interaction
- Electron
...
...
...

[JLindgaard (OP)]

 @Kartazion, quantum entanglement would be a start. That might be the most basic relationship. This is because the energy levels when quantum entanglement is observed is quite minimal. When 2 seemingly unrelated particles interact with each other below the quantum level is simply because that is how dark matter is inferred/quantified.
 If you consider the crystals used for attempts at quantum computing and how microwaves "flip" those crystals (reverse polarity), quantum entanglement occurs at a much smaller energy level.

[JLindgaard (OP)]

 This is the simple explanation; https://pa.as.uky.edu/uk-physics-team-contributes-fermilab%E2%80%99s-muon-g-2-experiment-reveals-evidence-new-physics

 They simply did not account for dark matter. Major face palm here. How do you make that mistake? You have to be born stupid or live in Kentucky like I do. And I want to move out of the U.S. to get away from this kind of stupid. I simply can't explain how they missed the obvious.

[JLindgaard (OP)]

 This is the simple explanation; https://pa.as.uky.edu/uk-physics-team-contributes-fermilab%E2%80%99s-muon-g-2-experiment-reveals-evidence-new-physics

 They simply did not account for dark matter. Major face palm here. How do you make that mistake? You have to be born stupid or live in Kentucky like I do. And I want to move out of the U.S. to get away from this kind of stupid. I simply can't explain how they missed the obvious.

[Kartazion]

@Kartazion, quantum entanglement would be a start. That might be the most basic relationship. This is because the energy levels when quantum entanglement is observed is quite minimal. When 2 seemingly unrelated particles interact with each other below the quantum level is simply because that is how dark matter is inferred/quantified.
 If you consider the crystals used for attempts at quantum computing and how microwaves "flip" those crystals (reverse polarity), quantum entanglement occurs at a much smaller energy level.

Quantum entanglement is the most complicated thing to understand that exists in quantum mechanics and works very well in the excited states of an atom. Its critical interpretation develops rather at the level of the explanation of Bell's inequalities which points out the complexity of this phenomenon.

[JLindgaard (OP)]

 Is this what you're referring to?
Bell's theorem is a term encompassing a number of closely-related results in physics, all of which determine that quantum mechanics is incompatible with local hidden-variable theories. The "local" in this case refers to the principle of locality, the idea that a particle can only be influenced by its immediate surroundings, and that interactions mediated by physical fields can only occur at speeds no greater than the speed of light. "Hidden variables" are hypothetical properties possessed by quantum particles, properties that are undetectable but still affect the outcome of experiments. In the words of physicist John Stewart Bell, for whom this family of results is named, "If [a hidden-variable theory] is local it will not agree with quantum mechanics, and if it agrees with quantum mechanics it will not be local."[1]

 I think the statement defeats itself. Light slowing when it moves past the Sun is a local effect. At the moment that is what we are discussing. Is gravity an effect or is it the cause of the effect that slows light.

[Bored chemist]

@Bored chemist, you should consider Einstein's work. He was a physicist. Astronomers verified his work. And today astronomers say dark matter. Have you ever considered that astronomers accepted what that research suggested?
 I have shown where both physicists and astronomers are publishing work which might have that common source.
I'd say in many ways my opinion doesn't matter but with the research that I am pursuing, accepting that there is a field that is distorted by gravity/celestial body would help to support my hypothesis, ie., my working theory.
 
 

Just try reading what you said.
Not what you think you said, but the actual words you typed.

astronomers say the Milky Way galaxy is in dark matter

[Kryptid]

Then would it be an odd thought to say that light slowed because space is denser closer to the Sun?

What would it mean for space to be "denser"?

[JLindgaard (OP)]

 gravity phonons would become denser in the space-time fabric it creates. When they become denser they would also become smaller. This means that the number of gravity phonons for 1mm^3 of space would increase.

[Bored chemist]

gravity phonons

What?

[JLindgaard (OP)]

 I have previously posted this.
Einstein [1] theorized in 1916 that a test mass travels towards a mass not because it is attracted by a force that acts across a distance between masses, but because the test mass travels through space and time that is warped by mass and energy. In this paper, the Interaction of a light Photon with a space-time fabric that has been deformed by a non-rotating Earth-like mass is described. The derivation is only for a slightly curved space-time fabric.
https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation.aspx?paperid=97163

 It's just as easy to say gravitons are particles. Scientists have speculated that neutrinos might be what dark matter is composed of. It's possible that dark matter particles are much smaller than a neutrino. And if so then it is possible that some energy such as photons and possibly neutrinos move between gravitons (gravity phonons).
 What would need to be considered is photons. If a wavelength that is 500nm (visible light), it would be composed of many photons.
And since matter cannot occupy occupied space (am stating the obvious here), how photons interact with dark matter (gravitons, gravity phonons) at the gravitational level, how "gravity" would allow for the wavelength of energy to remain cohesive while allowing for the inverse square law to show that over time and distance it has a specific rate of expansion.
 Basically as the space around the Sun decreases in density, the light it emits will occupy the space in that path. A question I could ask is if the Sun was not in a field of dark matter like the Milky Way galaxy, would light emitted from the Sun expand to occupy the space around the Sun? Or would its amplitude remain unchanged while it follows its path?

[Kartazion]

I have previously posted this.
Einstein [1] theorized in 1916 that a test mass travels towards a mass not because it is attracted by a force that acts across a distance between masses, but because the test mass travels through space and time that is warped by mass and energy. In this paper, the Interaction of a light Photon with a space-time fabric that has been deformed by a non-rotating Earth-like mass is described. The derivation is only for a slightly curved space-time fabric.
https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation.aspx?paperid=97163

 It's just as easy to say gravitons are particles. Scientists have speculated that neutrinos might be what dark matter is composed of. It's possible that dark matter particles are much smaller than a neutrino. And if so then it is possible that some energy such as photons and possibly neutrinos move between gravitons (gravity phonons).
 What would need to be considered is photons. If a wavelength that is 500nm (visible light), it would be composed of many photons.
And since matter cannot occupy occupied space (am stating the obvious here), how photons interact with dark matter (gravitons, gravity phonons) at the gravitational level, how "gravity" would allow for the wavelength of energy to remain cohesive while allowing for the inverse square law to show that over time and distance it has a specific rate of expansion.
 Basically as the space around the Sun decreases in density, the light it emits will occupy the space in that path. A question I could ask is if the Sun was not in a field of dark matter like the Milky Way galaxy, would light emitted from the Sun expand to occupy the space around the Sun? Or would its amplitude remain unchanged while it follows its path?

You are almost there. Now do a search for the oscillator and the universe and dark matter in your search engine. You will see.

gravity phonons

What?

It's about Negative Gravity.

[Kartazion]

The phonons are oscillator, and the oscillator explains everything about quantum mechanics through the particle, because the universe is an oscillator.

[JLindgaard (OP)]

  Phonons do not generate the current. They provide a field for wave energy to interact with. Gravity has yet to be explained. And then we are discussing why light moved closer to the Sun than what the theory of gravity allowed for.

[Kartazion]

Phonons do not generate the current. They provide a field for wave energy to interact with. Gravity has yet to be explained.

In-plane optical phonon modes of current-carrying graphene https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.00636

[JLindgaard (OP)]

 Those phonons were a carrier and did not generate the current. And the context that I am discussing is in a gravitational field. Einstein said that light was interacting with something. What is possible is that light moved towards the Sun because gravity phonons move in that direction. And light simply moved with the flow of gravity phonons.
 With the experiment that I am pursuing, if it works then since it does not use the photolytic or halogen process it might show if the magnetosphere influences the Earth's atmosphere. And if it does, then will that be because the magnetosphere influences the Earth's gravitational field? Basically an astronomical example of non-local behavior or quantum entanglement?
 If my work shows what I think it will, I'll need a working theory/hypothesis to support my work. Otherwise why am I spending time on an idea that has no scientific basis?

[Bored chemist]

"Scientific Research Publishing (SCIRP) is a predatory academic publisher of open-access electronic journals, conference proceedings, and scientific anthologies that are considered to be of questionable quality."
from
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_Research_Publishing
Do you have anything peer reviewed to support "gravity phonons"?

[JLindgaard (OP)]

@Bored chemist, from Cornell University;
The graviton is a hypothetical particle which is thought to be responsible for carrying the force of gravity, in analogy to the photon, which is responsible for communicating all electromagnetic forces.
http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/physics/137-general-physics/particles-and-quantum-physics/813-what-is-a-graviton-intermediate
 Is Cornell University a credible source of information? And as I mentioned, with the experiment that I am pursuing, neither the photolytic or halogen process will influence the experiment. What will be left would be a new process if my experiment is successful
 To say that the absorption and emission spectrums would become more prominent in a field with less electromagnetic radiation would not be unexpected. Then if that same experiment shows that the number of interactions allows for new molecules/compounds to occur dependent on the "proximity" to the magnetosphere, Coulomb's law would not apply. Then something else would be influencing the Earth's atmosphere.
 And it is known that the height of the troposphere changes from the equator to the poles. And for the 3 climatic zones that the Earth has, those align themselves with the Van Allen radiation belts. An example is that where the tropics are near the equator, so is the inner radiation belt. I don't think that's a coincidence. And that is where the height of the troposphere is also at its highest elevation. And yet this is also where the Earth's rotation would distort the space around it (its gravitational field) the most. I had to keep gravity in the discussion.
 It's nothing personal bored chemist but this is a different type of chemistry than what organic chemistry allows for.

 @All, just to be clear on this, if the Van Allen radiation belts are raising the ceiling height of the troposphere (the greenhouse we live in) the Earth's spin might actually be trying to pull it closer
because of how its rotation distorts the space around it.
 This gets into Einstein saying the Sun warps the space around it.

[Kartazion]

Those phonons were a carrier and did not generate the current.

My previous link is very explicit in view of an evolution of modern interpretation. This is what the phonovoltaic base is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phonovoltaic

[JLindgaard (OP)]

 That is a different application than moving light from a distant star closer to the Sun. I'll say that as gravitons move towards the Sun generating its gravitational field, it changed the path the light was following. What you're discussing might have more to do with the magnetic field which is something different.
 You could consider if the phonovoltaic effect creates or helps to create the Earth's magnetic field. If so, then do you think at the place of the most excitement/distortion that an inner radiation belt might be observed?