The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. General Science
  3. General Science
  4. What should we do with radioactive waste from the nuclear power industry ?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

What should we do with radioactive waste from the nuclear power industry ?

  • 28 Replies
  • 10850 Views
  • 3 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Petrochemicals (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3629
  • Activity:
    6.5%
  • Thanked: 182 times
  • forum overlord
What should we do with radioactive waste from the nuclear power industry ?
« on: 26/09/2022 21:36:17 »
With the world transfixed on reducing carbon emissions and the Ukraine war showing the vulnerability in energy supplies, it is almost certain the world will embark upon nuclear energy as a means to secure energy security and lower co2.  This will mean a vast increase in waste. How are we to deal with it ?

1) long term storage as is touted at present for the current scrap heap of radioactive junk.

2)launch it into to the sun

3)bury it deep by a subduction zone

4)throw it in the Mariana trench or similar deep ocean. The Pacific seems to have been able to deal with the Fukushima spill.

5)keep it until we find a way to transmogrify said radioactive waste to products of non hazardous nature

6)use the thorium fuel cycle

Or something else.
Logged
For reasons of repetitive antagonism, this user is currently not responding to messages from;
BoredChemist
To ignore someone too, go to your profile settings>modifyprofie>ignore!
 
The following users thanked this post: Zer0



Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21167
  • Activity:
    60.5%
  • Thanked: 61 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: What should we do with radioactive waste from the nuclear power industry ?
« Reply #1 on: 26/09/2022 22:42:18 »
1,3,6.

The most important problem isn't high level waste, of which there is a fairly small quantity in fairly "clean" form, but intermediate level junk - contaminated and activated bits of machinery that take up a lot of space and can't be economically processed or handled automatically.

The real answer is "something else"- reduce power demand to a level that can be sustained with renewables.  Fact is that you need to expend a lot of fossil fuel to build a safe nuke, and there probably isn't enough fossil energy to build enough nukes to meet demand 50 or 100 years hence if current trends continue. Nor is there enough potential renewable power.
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline Niko43Gold

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 12
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: What should we do with radioactive waste from the nuclear power industry ?
« Reply #2 on: 06/10/2022 21:09:42 »
Actually Im a little worried about this war because you never know what will happen if they reach Cernobyl
Logged
 

Offline Colin2B

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6476
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 708 times
Re: What should we do with radioactive waste from the nuclear power industry ?
« Reply #3 on: 07/10/2022 09:14:29 »
Quote from: Niko43Gold on 06/10/2022 21:09:42
Actually Im a little worried about this war because you never know what will happen if they reach Cernobyl
Perhaps you should look at what happened when they did earlier this year
Logged
and the misguided shall lead the gullible,
the feebleminded have inherited the earth.
 
The following users thanked this post: SeanB

Offline paul cotter

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2322
  • Activity:
    23.5%
  • Thanked: 260 times
  • forum grump
Re: What should we do with radioactive waste from the nuclear power industry ?
« Reply #4 on: 07/10/2022 09:47:16 »
Vitrification and deep burial for high level waste. As alancalverd has pointed out the bulk of low and medium level material presents a major problem. The thorium reactors are proven, as far as I know, and cannot be diverted to produce weapon grade products. Also there are huge reserves of thorium. How about a population reduction to 500million and be attacked by the conspiracists?
Logged
Did I really say that?
 



Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21167
  • Activity:
    60.5%
  • Thanked: 61 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: What should we do with radioactive waste from the nuclear power industry ?
« Reply #5 on: 07/10/2022 09:54:45 »
Chernobyl was unfortunate as the intermediate level wind was blowing towards the north and west, thus dumping  radioactive crap on Belarus (which was civilised at the time) and western Europe. The likelihood, if the Russians manage to damage Zaphorizhye and cause a major fire, is that most of the really hot crap will fall on what Putin has now been claimed to be Russian territory, and the longer-lived high altitude cloud will blow over Mother Russia and poison his loyal taxpayers.

Nobody enjoys an own-goal, but a win is still a win.
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21167
  • Activity:
    60.5%
  • Thanked: 61 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: What should we do with radioactive waste from the nuclear power industry ?
« Reply #6 on: 07/10/2022 09:56:17 »
Quote from: paul cotter on 07/10/2022 09:47:16
How about a population reduction to 500million and be attacked by the conspiracists?
Welcome to the club, my friend!
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 
The following users thanked this post: Zer0, paul cotter

Offline Petrochemicals (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3629
  • Activity:
    6.5%
  • Thanked: 182 times
  • forum overlord
Re: What should we do with radioactive waste from the nuclear power industry ?
« Reply #7 on: 07/10/2022 13:15:41 »
Quote from: paul cotter on 07/10/2022 09:47:16
. How about a population reduction to 500million and be attacked by the conspiracists?
How about a nice plague, or are you partial to famin Paul?
 
Rhodium and uranium 238 can be transmitted to bomb grade stuff, if only the fellows at oak ridge knew.
Logged
For reasons of repetitive antagonism, this user is currently not responding to messages from;
BoredChemist
To ignore someone too, go to your profile settings>modifyprofie>ignore!
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31103
  • Activity:
    9.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: What should we do with radioactive waste from the nuclear power industry ?
« Reply #8 on: 07/10/2022 13:23:57 »
Quote from: Petrochemicals on 07/10/2022 13:15:41
Rhodium and uranium 238 can be transmitted to bomb grade stuff
WTF?
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



Offline paul cotter

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2322
  • Activity:
    23.5%
  • Thanked: 260 times
  • forum grump
Re: What should we do with radioactive waste from the nuclear power industry ?
« Reply #9 on: 07/10/2022 14:46:15 »
Rhodium??. Rhodium is nowhere near heavy enough to be fissile and is extremely rare.U238 while fissionable by fast neutrons is not fissile. If one has a nuclear reactor handy u238 can be transformed to p239 via neptunium but this is by no means easy and a very complex procedure( as done for the manhattan project ).
« Last Edit: 07/10/2022 14:50:05 by paul cotter »
Logged
Did I really say that?
 

Offline Petrochemicals (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3629
  • Activity:
    6.5%
  • Thanked: 182 times
  • forum overlord
Re: What should we do with radioactive waste from the nuclear power industry ?
« Reply #10 on: 07/10/2022 16:05:45 »
Quote from: paul cotter on 07/10/2022 14:46:15
Rhodium??. Rhodium is nowhere near heavy enough to be fissile and is extremely rare.U238 while fissionable by fast neutrons is not fissile. If one has a nuclear reactor handy u238 can be transformed to p239 via neptunium but this is by no means easy and a very complex procedure( as done for the manhattan project ).
Quote from: Petrochemicals on 07/10/2022 13:15:41

How about a nice plague, or are you partial to famin Paul?
 
Rhodium and uranium 238 can be transmitted to bomb grade stuff, if only the fellows at oak ridge knew.
That's the spell check for you, thorium becomes rhodium, transmutated becomes transmitted.
Logged
For reasons of repetitive antagonism, this user is currently not responding to messages from;
BoredChemist
To ignore someone too, go to your profile settings>modifyprofie>ignore!
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31103
  • Activity:
    9.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: What should we do with radioactive waste from the nuclear power industry ?
« Reply #11 on: 07/10/2022 16:14:02 »
Quote from: Petrochemicals on 07/10/2022 16:05:45
That's the spell check for you, thorium becomes rhodium, transmutated becomes transmitted.
OK, "transmutated" isn't a word, so you can't blame the spell checker for not recognising it..
It copes perfectly well with transmuted.
 It obviously copes with "thorium" as shown by the first post in the thread.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline paul cotter

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2322
  • Activity:
    23.5%
  • Thanked: 260 times
  • forum grump
Re: What should we do with radioactive waste from the nuclear power industry ?
« Reply #12 on: 07/10/2022 16:47:10 »
Petro, Alancalverd and I are not suggesting anything of the sort. Slow reduction through birth control and natural wastage. If this doesn't happen the end result of an ever increasing population coupled with diminishing resources will lead to a scenario worse than your worst possible nightmare.
Logged
Did I really say that?
 
The following users thanked this post: Zer0



Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21167
  • Activity:
    60.5%
  • Thanked: 61 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: What should we do with radioactive waste from the nuclear power industry ?
« Reply #13 on: 07/10/2022 16:52:55 »
Quote from: Petrochemicals on 07/10/2022 13:15:41
How about a nice plague, or are you partial to famin Paul?
Plague is unlikely to have the desired effect and famine, whilst inevitable if we change nothing, could be avoided by actively controlling the human population. If we stopped making babies, the population would drop to zero in 100 years. If we just reduced the birthrate by only having one child per female, the population would be at an indefinitely sustainable level in 50 - 70 years with a "western" standard of living for everyone.
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 
The following users thanked this post: Zer0, paul cotter

Offline Petrochemicals (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3629
  • Activity:
    6.5%
  • Thanked: 182 times
  • forum overlord
Re: What should we do with radioactive waste from the nuclear power industry ?
« Reply #14 on: 07/10/2022 18:31:46 »
Quote from: paul cotter on 07/10/2022 16:47:10
Petro, Alancalverd and I are not suggesting anything of the sort. Slow reduction through birth control and natural wastage. If this doesn't happen the end result of an ever increasing population coupled with diminishing resources will lead to a scenario worse than your worst possible nightmare.
Quote from: alancalverd on 07/10/2022 16:52:55
Quote from: Petrochemicals on 07/10/2022 13:15:41
How about a nice plague, or are you partial to famin Paul?
Plague is unlikely to have the desired effect and famine, whilst inevitable if we change nothing, could be avoided by actively controlling the human population. If we stopped making babies, the population would drop to zero in 100 years. If we just reduced the birthrate by only having one child per female, the population would be at an indefinitely sustainable level in 50 - 70 years with a "western" standard of living for everyone.
Yep, but what about all the expectant grandparents and broody couples ?
Logged
For reasons of repetitive antagonism, this user is currently not responding to messages from;
BoredChemist
To ignore someone too, go to your profile settings>modifyprofie>ignore!
 

Offline paul cotter

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2322
  • Activity:
    23.5%
  • Thanked: 260 times
  • forum grump
Re: What should we do with radioactive waste from the nuclear power industry ?
« Reply #15 on: 07/10/2022 18:44:51 »
They will all starve if nothing is done.
Logged
Did I really say that?
 
The following users thanked this post: Zer0

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21167
  • Activity:
    60.5%
  • Thanked: 61 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: What should we do with radioactive waste from the nuclear power industry ?
« Reply #16 on: 07/10/2022 23:24:48 »
Anyone who experienced Jeremy Corbyn throwing Britain down the toilet of history will be inured to disappointment.
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 



Offline savita

  • First timers
  • *
  • 1
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
What should we do with radioactive waste from the nuclear power industry ?
« Reply #17 on: 11/10/2022 06:46:36 »
Direct disposal is, as the name suggests, a [link removed]management strategy where used nuclear fuel is designated as waste and disposed of in an underground repository, without any recycling. The used fuel is placed in canisters which, in turn, are placed in tunnels and subsequently sealed with rocks and clay
« Last Edit: 11/10/2022 08:53:10 by Colin2B »
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31103
  • Activity:
    9.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: What should we do with radioactive waste from the nuclear power industry ?
« Reply #18 on: 11/10/2022 08:34:13 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 07/10/2022 23:24:48
Anyone who experienced Jeremy Corbyn throwing Britain down the toilet of history will be inured to disappointment.
What?
The brexiteers who got into power threw the country down the pan, rathe than the one who didn't.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21167
  • Activity:
    60.5%
  • Thanked: 61 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: What should we do with radioactive waste from the nuclear power industry ?
« Reply #19 on: 11/10/2022 15:44:49 »
Corbyn got them elected by the simple process of never actually answering a question or proposing a policy on anything. Nobody in their right mind would vote Conservative if there was any credible alternative.
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 



  • Print
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: nuclear waste  / radioactive materials  / radioactive decay 
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.674 seconds with 79 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.