[Origin]

W reduction at increasing T in vacuum disproves F=ma

Huh?!  Work (W=F*s) decreases as temperature increases in a vacuum? 
What in the hell are talking about?

[Yaniv (OP)]

W reduction at increasing T in vacuum disproves F=ma

Huh?!  Work (W=F*s) decreases as temperature increases in a vacuum? 
What in the hell are talking about?

My theory predicts weight (W) should decrease at increasing temperature (T) in vacuum.

[The Spoon]

W reduction at increasing T in vacuum disproves F=ma

Huh?!  Work (W=F*s) decreases as temperature increases in a vacuum? 
What in the hell are talking about?

My theory predicts weight (W) should decrease at increasing temperature (T) in vacuum.

That is because your 'theory' is a series of nonsensical brain farts.

[Kryptid]

W reduction at increasing T in vacuum...

No such thing has ever been verified. Existing evidence strongly goes against that.

My theory predicts weight (W) should decrease at increasing temperature (T) in vacuum.

That is not a counterargument. It is an unevidenced assertion. So please show me actual evidence that the gravitational constant is wrong.

[Yaniv (OP)]

W reduction at increasing T in vacuum...

No such thing has ever been verified. Existing evidence strongly goes against that.

My theory predicts weight (W) should decrease at increasing temperature (T) in vacuum.

That is not a counterargument. It is an unevidenced assertion. So please show me actual evidence that the gravitational constant is wrong.

#ResultsRequired

[alancalverd]

My theory predicts weight (W) should decrease at increasing temperature (T) in vacuum.

By how much?

[Bored chemist]

Quote from: Yaniv on Today at 08:40:47
ResultsRequired
So why have you not provided any results?

[Bored chemist]

My theory predicts weight (W) should decrease at increasing temperature (T) in vacuum.

If it was true we would know because the Moon's orbit round the earth wold depend on the temperature of the moon.
And we know that the moon gets a bit warmer when it (and the Earth) are near to the sun, but it cools when it is far from the sun

So, when you say "ResultsRequired"
Do you not realise we already have the result of the experiment- the solar system does it for us.
And you are simply wrong.
The effect that you ex[pet does not happen.

[Kryptid]

#ResultsRequired

This is not a counterargument.

[Yaniv (OP)]

My theory predicts weight (W) should decrease at increasing temperature (T) in vacuum.

By how much?

More than zero.

[Yaniv (OP)]

Quote from: Yaniv on Today at 08:40:47
ResultsRequired
So why have you not provided any results?

I could not find scientists interested to conclude the experiment.

[Yaniv (OP)]

My theory predicts weight (W) should decrease at increasing temperature (T) in vacuum.

If it was true we would know because the Moon's orbit round the earth wold depend on the temperature of the moon.
And we know that the moon gets a bit warmer when it (and the Earth) are near to the sun, but it cools when it is far from the sun

So, when you say "ResultsRequired"
Do you not realise we already have the result of the experiment- the solar system does it for us.
And you are simply wrong.
The effect that you ex[pet does not happen.

In my theory hot and cold objects should fall at the same rate.

[Bored chemist]

Quote from: Yaniv on Today at 08:40:47
ResultsRequired
So why have you not provided any results?

I could not find scientists interested to conclude the experiment.

So, because you have no evidence, you claim it is true.
Do you think that is sensible?

[Bored chemist]

In my theory hot and cold objects should fall at the same rate.

Either you say the weight changes, or you say it does not.
You can't have it both ways.

[Kryptid]

So please show me actual evidence that the gravitational constant is wrong.

[Yaniv (OP)]

In my theory hot and cold objects should fall at the same rate.

Either you say the weight changes, or you say it does not.
You can't have it both ways.

You can if W≠mg.

[Yaniv (OP)]

Quote from: Yaniv on Today at 08:40:47
ResultsRequired
So why have you not provided any results?

I could not find scientists interested to conclude the experiment.

So, because you have no evidence, you claim it is true.
Do you think that is sensible?

I think it is sensible to wait for the results of the experiment.

[Yaniv (OP)]

So please show me actual evidence that the gravitational constant is wrong.

I don't expect physicists to give up scriptures and conclude the experiment.

[Kryptid]

So please show me actual evidence that the gravitational constant is wrong.

I don't expect physicists to give up scriptures and conclude the experiment.

I asked for evidence. You have yet to supply any. Until then, we have no reason to believe that the gravitational constant is wrong.

[The Spoon]

So please show me actual evidence that the gravitational constant is wrong.

I don't expect physicists to give up scriptures and conclude the experiment.

Which perfectly demonstrates your lack of understanding of science and the scientific method.