The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Life Sciences
  3. Plant Sciences, Zoology & Evolution
  4. Owls do it better
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Owls do it better

  • 7 Replies
  • 6023 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline DoctorBeaver (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 12653
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • A stitch in time would have confused Einstein.
Owls do it better
« on: 29/06/2007 19:51:19 »
It would take 12 cats to catch as many mice in 1 night as a barn owl.
Logged
 



paul.fr

  • Guest
Owls do it better
« Reply #1 on: 30/06/2007 07:46:41 »
And your question is?
Logged
 

Offline kdlynn

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2851
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 2 times
Owls do it better
« Reply #2 on: 30/06/2007 07:53:32 »
maybe the question is why people don't have pet owls?
Logged
 

paul.fr

  • Guest
Owls do it better
« Reply #3 on: 30/06/2007 07:59:50 »
Quote from: kdlynn on 30/06/2007 07:53:32
maybe the question is why people don't have pet owls?

a pet owl would be a hoot, although it could rustle a few of the neighbours feathers  [^]
Logged
 

Offline kdlynn

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2851
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 2 times
Owls do it better
« Reply #4 on: 30/06/2007 08:01:26 »
lol
Logged
 



Offline DoctorBeaver (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 12653
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • A stitch in time would have confused Einstein.
Owls do it better
« Reply #5 on: 30/06/2007 10:05:56 »
Quote from: paul.fr on 30/06/2007 07:46:41
And your question is?

My question is, who said we have to ask questions?
Logged
 

paul.fr

  • Guest
Owls do it better
« Reply #6 on: 30/06/2007 14:52:28 »
Quote from: DoctorBeaver on 30/06/2007 10:05:56


My question is, who said we have to ask questions?

I going to tell my dad, about you  [:-'(]  [:-'(]
Logged
 

another_someone

  • Guest
Owls do it better
« Reply #7 on: 30/06/2007 15:59:12 »
Quote from: kdlynn on 30/06/2007 07:53:32
maybe the question is why people don't have pet owls?

A number of owls are now regarded as endanger species, and probably would be illegal to keep in captivity (unless already bred from captive stock).

Also, where are the owls and the cats catching the mice.  Owls may catch mice well, but in the open, and over a large area.  An owl is scarcely going to catch mice in your basement or kitchen - and the one's living out in the fields don't really present much of a problem as vermin.

I believe the Wends (early pagan Slavic tribes in eastern Europe) used to keep snakes to catch vermin.  Part of their enforced christianisation by the Teutonic knights included that they give up their use of pet snakes for this purpose.
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.273 seconds with 39 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.