The Naked Scientists
Toggle navigation
Login
Register
Podcasts
The Naked Scientists
eLife
Naked Genetics
Naked Astronomy
In short
Naked Neuroscience
Ask! The Naked Scientists
Question of the Week
Archive
Video
SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
Articles
Science News
Features
Interviews
Answers to Science Questions
Get Naked
Donate
Do an Experiment
Science Forum
Ask a Question
About
Meet the team
Our Sponsors
Site Map
Contact us
User menu
Login
Register
Search
Home
Help
Search
Tags
Member Map
Recent Topics
Login
Register
Naked Science Forum
General Discussion & Feedback
Just Chat!
'Treason' As Defined In The U.S. Constitution...
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
'Treason' As Defined In The U.S. Constitution...
0 Replies
843 Views
0 Tags
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Jimbee
(OP)
Sr. Member
182
Activity:
2%
Thanked: 21 times
'Treason' As Defined In The U.S. Constitution...
«
on:
09/02/2023 10:32:05 »
I don't if anyone here is interested in mundane information like this. But I thought I'd post it anyways.
"Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court."
"The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted."
U.S. CONSTITUTION, ARTICLE III, SECTION 3, CLAUSES 1 & 2.
The U.S. definition of treason is very limited. In europe at the time, simply harming your monarch or sovereign was an act of treason. Not so in the U.S.
Also, it says
"...but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted...."
In ancient England, when a person was found guilty of treason, their very blood was deemed corrupt. This meant they took away the wealth and titles of your family members too. In the U.S. this injustice practice is abolished, because no one should be held accountable for the crimes of their ancestors, if they are in fact innocent of the crime themselves. Although up until the time the traitor (as their called) is executed, they can take away their assets. After that, it becomes their children's inheritance. So they must leave it alone (i.e.,
"...except during the Life of the Person attainted...."
). And BTW, "attainder" is simply an obsolete word for traitor, since such a person bore the "taint" or mark of infamy for treason. We don't use that word, or the word "traitor" anymore. But the term still appears in the U.S. Constitution.
Another interesting note. Did you know that treason is one of only three crimes that must require an overt act? The other two are attempt and conspiracy. Now that would make a good question on the exam in a law class. Because who would know that? People just don't get arrested for treason anymore, you know.
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tags:
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...