The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. New theory of evolution
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4   Go Down

New theory of evolution

  • 70 Replies
  • 71169 Views
  • 4 Tags

0 Members and 40 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    13%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: New theory of evolution
« Reply #20 on: 05/04/2023 12:52:04 »
Quote from: cpu68 on 05/04/2023 12:46:59
Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 04/04/2023 13:09:19
They do.

ok, give an example of an evolving meme
Christianity.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 
The following users thanked this post: hamdani yusuf



Offline cpu68 (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 290
  • Activity:
    12.5%
  • Thanked: 12 times
  • Scientist
Re: New theory of evolution
« Reply #21 on: 19/07/2023 09:02:45 »
My theory of evolution confirms Gould-Eldredge's concept of microevolution.
Logged
From the miracle of life I come to the miracle of cosmos, Gregory Podgorniak
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    13%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: New theory of evolution
« Reply #22 on: 19/07/2023 11:39:07 »
Quote from: cpu68 on 19/07/2023 09:02:45
My theory of evolution confirms Gould-Eldredge's concept of microevolution.
It's still not a theory.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline Zer0

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1932
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 232 times
  • Email & Nickname Alerts Off! P.M. Blocked!
Re: New theory of evolution
« Reply #23 on: 06/08/2023 21:54:38 »
Quote from: cpu68 on 13/03/2023 11:12:02

Thanks to deep and penetrating researchings I was able to establish indisputably some number of my past incarnations reaching of ancient period, these data are certain, these incarnations are: Auguste Comte (1798-1857) French philosopher and sociologist, Edme Mariotte (1620-1684) French physicist and meteorologist, Bodhidharma (5th or 6th century) buddhist patriarch, Aenesidemus (1 st century BC) Greek sceptical philosopher, Arcesilaus (315-241 BC) Greek sceptical philosopher, Gorgias (485-380 BC) Greek sophist.

ROFL
U r a Funny chap!
But I'm afraid U ain't tryin to be one.

Anyhow, Extraordinary claims, Extraordinary evidence.

Bodhidharma aka Daruma had 2 Specific Pets.
Surely you Remember what those Creatures were & what He named them.
Right?
Logged
1N73LL1G3NC3  15  7H3  481L17Y  70  4D4P7  70  CH4NG3.
 

Offline cpu68 (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 290
  • Activity:
    12.5%
  • Thanked: 12 times
  • Scientist
Re: New theory of evolution
« Reply #24 on: 12/09/2023 09:46:20 »
Processes of gigaevolution and biological megaevolution possess common turning point, it was appearance of fish-amphibia similar to genus Ichthyostega (370 millions of years, see image below).



diagram. Turning point of evolution - Ichthyostega
Logged
From the miracle of life I come to the miracle of cosmos, Gregory Podgorniak
 



Offline hamdani yusuf

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 11803
  • Activity:
    89.5%
  • Thanked: 285 times
Re: New theory of evolution
« Reply #25 on: 13/09/2023 15:02:13 »
What's the difference between gigaevolution and biological megaevolution possess ?
Logged
Unexpected results come from false assumptions.
 
The following users thanked this post: cpu68

Offline cpu68 (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 290
  • Activity:
    12.5%
  • Thanked: 12 times
  • Scientist
Re: New theory of evolution
« Reply #26 on: 13/09/2023 15:43:25 »
Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 13/09/2023 15:02:13
What's the difference between gigaevolution and biological megaevolution possess ?

Gigaevolution encompasses cosmological, astronomical, physical, chemical, biological and cultural processes on the largest scale. Biological megaevolution encompasses biological processes on the largest scales.
Logged
From the miracle of life I come to the miracle of cosmos, Gregory Podgorniak
 

Offline Origin

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2248
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 210 times
  • Nothing of importance
Re: New theory of evolution
« Reply #27 on: 14/09/2023 18:53:20 »
Quote from: cpu68 on 13/09/2023 15:43:25
Gigaevolution encompasses cosmological, astronomical, physical, chemical, biological and cultural processes on the largest scale. Biological megaevolution encompasses biological processes on the largest scales
So these made up terms are the same thing as far as biological evolution is concerned.  Why have two terms for the same thing, what ever that 'thing' is supposed to be.
Logged
 

Offline hamdani yusuf

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 11803
  • Activity:
    89.5%
  • Thanked: 285 times
Re: New theory of evolution
« Reply #28 on: 15/09/2023 05:14:06 »
Quote from: Origin on 14/09/2023 18:53:20
Quote from: cpu68 on 13/09/2023 15:43:25
Gigaevolution encompasses cosmological, astronomical, physical, chemical, biological and cultural processes on the largest scale. Biological megaevolution encompasses biological processes on the largest scales
So these made up terms are the same thing as far as biological evolution is concerned.  Why have two terms for the same thing, what ever that 'thing' is supposed to be.
He said that gigaevolution is not limited to biological process. In other words, it's the superset of biological process.
Logged
Unexpected results come from false assumptions.
 
The following users thanked this post: cpu68



Offline cpu68 (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 290
  • Activity:
    12.5%
  • Thanked: 12 times
  • Scientist
Re: New theory of evolution
« Reply #29 on: 15/09/2023 08:53:33 »
Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 15/09/2023 05:14:06
He said that gigaevolution is not limited to biological process. In other words, it's the superset of biological process.

Of course, you are right Yusuf.
Logged
From the miracle of life I come to the miracle of cosmos, Gregory Podgorniak
 

Offline cpu68 (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 290
  • Activity:
    12.5%
  • Thanked: 12 times
  • Scientist
Re: New theory of evolution
« Reply #30 on: 28/10/2023 13:15:40 »
Hitherto conception of Gould-Eldredge was treated harshly. There is not its in basic manuals from a scope of biology.
Logged
From the miracle of life I come to the miracle of cosmos, Gregory Podgorniak
 

Offline Origin

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2248
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 210 times
  • Nothing of importance
Re: New theory of evolution
« Reply #31 on: 28/10/2023 15:54:41 »
Quote from: cpu68 on 28/10/2023 13:15:40
There is not its in basic manuals from a scope of biology.
Well said!
Logged
 

Offline cpu68 (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 290
  • Activity:
    12.5%
  • Thanked: 12 times
  • Scientist
Re: New theory of evolution
« Reply #32 on: 29/11/2023 15:08:18 »
There are no qualitative changes, only quantitative ones.
Logged
From the miracle of life I come to the miracle of cosmos, Gregory Podgorniak
 



Offline cpu68 (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 290
  • Activity:
    12.5%
  • Thanked: 12 times
  • Scientist
Re: New theory of evolution
« Reply #33 on: 19/01/2024 07:54:49 »
The logistic model can be applied to various levels of evolution, including the evolution of a species of intelligent forms.
Logged
From the miracle of life I come to the miracle of cosmos, Gregory Podgorniak
 

Offline cpu68 (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 290
  • Activity:
    12.5%
  • Thanked: 12 times
  • Scientist
Re: New theory of evolution
« Reply #34 on: 19/03/2024 10:08:58 »
The problem is that the current theory of evolution is gradualistic and its graph may be an ascending straight line. I proposed a logistic model where a sigmoid curve is applicable at all levels of evolution.
Logged
From the miracle of life I come to the miracle of cosmos, Gregory Podgorniak
 

Offline Zer0

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1932
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 232 times
  • Email & Nickname Alerts Off! P.M. Blocked!
Re: New theory of evolution
« Reply #35 on: 20/03/2024 16:52:53 »
Welcome back @ cpu.

i was under the impression that You got Banned from TNS or sumthin.
(Hope you are doing Well?)

To be Honest...
I do Wish you get Banned.

I'd rather like to see you create Threads someplace Else, & then have them moved to a Trash Can section or something.

Instead of seeing you repeatedly being treated like trash in here.

ps - hope you are aware of the " Ignore & Block User " option available on the forum.
(u can ask Moderators for help too, They are mostly Helpful)

U tc now.
: )
Logged
1N73LL1G3NC3  15  7H3  481L17Y  70  4D4P7  70  CH4NG3.
 

Offline cpu68 (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 290
  • Activity:
    12.5%
  • Thanked: 12 times
  • Scientist
Re: New theory of evolution
« Reply #36 on: 08/05/2024 08:19:17 »
In the future, we will probably move to extracorporeal reproduction in artificial conditions. For this purpose, one can imagine incubators with artificially grown biological tissue of the uterus, in which the development of the fetus could take place (on a similar principle, one can imagine the artificial cultivation of meat food). Such extracorporeal reproduction may be necessary due to the enlarged braincases of future superhuman species. With a significantly enlarged braincase, natural birth from the mother's womb may be too difficult or even impossible. Of course, it will be possible to use genetic engineering to control the expansion of the braincase. I will also add that the enlargement of the braincase should not be an unlimited or too far-reaching process, the braincase will be significantly larger compared to the current human species, but it will not be a superbrain, with a head the size of a meter or more. Such a limitation results from the possibility of movement of a given superhuman form, from the ability to keep the head on the neck or move the head, etc. Because for the normal development and life of a given intelligent form, whether a superhuman or some cosmic form, sensory stimuli are needed.
Logged
From the miracle of life I come to the miracle of cosmos, Gregory Podgorniak
 



Offline Darlalarsen

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 11
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: New theory of evolution
« Reply #37 on: 27/06/2024 12:51:40 »
Quote from: cpu68 on 08/05/2024 08:19:17
In the future, we will probably move to extracorporeal reproduction in artificial conditions. For this purpose, one can imagine incubators with artificially grown biological tissue of the uterus, in which the development of the fetus could take place (on a similar principle, one can imagine the artificial cultivation of meat food). Such extracorporeal reproduction may be necessary due to the enlarged braincases of future superhuman species. With a significantly enlarged braincase, natural birth from the mother's womb may be too difficult or even impossible. Of course, it will be possible to use genetic engineering to control the expansion of the braincase. I will also add that the enlargement of the braincase should not be an unlimited or too far-reaching process, the braincase will be significantly larger compared to the current human species, but it will not be a superbrain, with a head the size of a meter or more. The theory of evolution can be debated for a long time. Biology is a difficult subject and ambiguous; I argued with the teacher for a long time on this topic. Then I searched for topics in biology, used https://papersowl.com/blog/biology-research-paper-topics [nofollow] for this. I chose this topic for myself. In fact, I don't believe in any theory. A refutation can be found in each. Such a limitation results from the possibility of movement of a given superhuman form, from the ability to keep the head on the neck or move the head, etc. Because for the normal development and life of a given intelligent form, whether a superhuman or some cosmic form, sensory stimuli are needed.
There are many questions not directed at you, but in general:
How will the use of such technologies be regulated?
What rights will fruits grown in artificial conditions have?
« Last Edit: 28/06/2024 12:22:01 by Darlalarsen »
Logged
 

Offline hamdani yusuf

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 11803
  • Activity:
    89.5%
  • Thanked: 285 times
Re: New theory of evolution
« Reply #38 on: 27/06/2024 13:01:50 »
IMO, supersized brain won't be needed. It won't help its hosts to compete against someone who has direct brain computer interface to Artificial Super Intelligence.
« Last Edit: 27/06/2024 13:48:19 by hamdani yusuf »
Logged
Unexpected results come from false assumptions.
 

Offline paul cotter

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2319
  • Activity:
    31.5%
  • Thanked: 260 times
  • forum grump
Re: New theory of evolution
« Reply #39 on: 27/06/2024 13:55:23 »
Brain computer interface is about as unlikely as flying pigs. A lot of people assume that the human brain is a computer- this is not the case and our knowledge of how the brain works is still primitive.
Logged
Did I really say that?
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: reincarnation  / pseudoscience.  / evolution  / rebirth 
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.788 seconds with 71 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.