The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Could the James Webb telescope save NASA hundreds of millions?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Could the James Webb telescope save NASA hundreds of millions?

  • 1 Replies
  • 4149 Views
  • 3 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Pseudoscience-is-malarkey (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 939
  • Activity:
    1%
  • Thanked: 32 times
Could the James Webb telescope save NASA hundreds of millions?
« on: 29/08/2023 15:28:50 »
The New Horizons spacecraft cost three-quarters of a billion dollars. Can the James Webb telescope get the same data without having to visit them?
« Last Edit: 02/09/2023 07:26:05 by Pseudoscience-is-malarkey »
Logged
 



Offline evan_au

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 11035
  • Activity:
    9%
  • Thanked: 1486 times
Re: Could the James Webb telescope had saved NASA hundreds of millions?
« Reply #1 on: 29/08/2023 22:16:29 »
The James Webb Space Telescope cost $US10 billion. It was a gross budget blow-out!
- They considered canceling it several times, but then it became "too big to fail"

The JWST cannot take pictures of Pluto/Charon in anywhere near the same detail as an up-close fly-by.
- And it cannot take pictures of farther objects, either, like Arrakoth in the Kuiper Belt
- JWST is an infra-red telescope, and you need a much larger dish to get the same resolution as a visible-light telescope like Hubble. JWST has similar resolution to Hubble.
- Hubble was used in selecting Arrakoth as a target to visit beyond Pluto. Hubble can only see it as a faint dot of light, which moves against the background stars as Earth goes around its orbit.
- But New Horizons took high-resolution images of Arrakoth from up-close. Not possible with Hubble.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/486958_Arrokoth
Logged
 
The following users thanked this post: Zer0



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: new horizons  / hubble  / jwst 
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.25 seconds with 27 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.