The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. General Discussion & Feedback
  3. Just Chat!
  4. Family claim Amber Alert ruptured son's eardrums
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Family claim Amber Alert ruptured son's eardrums

  • 8 Replies
  • 2675 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SkepticalDebunker (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 47
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Family claim Amber Alert ruptured son's eardrums
« on: 06/05/2024 14:14:40 »
https://globalnews.ca/news/8851556/apple-lawsuit-amber-alert-hearing-damage/

https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/44560022/Gordoa_et_al_v_Apple,_Inc_et_al

I did some Googling, and the maximum output physically possible for Airpods is 100-105 decibels when in the ear. So if they're playing a sound at maximum volume, the maximum decibels their eardrums could be exposed to is 100-105 decibels. Apparently, the family waited two years before filing the lawsuit, but I can't find a source for this as of now, it was a comment made on Reddit.

Is 100-105 decibels enough to instantly rupture a person's eardrum and immediately cause permanent hearing damage as the family claims?
« Last Edit: 06/05/2024 15:08:45 by SkepticalDebunker »
Logged
 



Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21155
  • Activity:
    73.5%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: Family claim Amber Alert ruptured son's eardrums
« Reply #1 on: 06/05/2024 19:25:53 »
No.

Statutory occupational peak limit is 135 dB.
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline SkepticalDebunker (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 47
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Family claim Amber Alert ruptured son's eardrums
« Reply #2 on: 07/05/2024 16:49:23 »
Would the suddenness of the sound make it more damaging?
Logged
 

Offline paul cotter

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2319
  • Activity:
    31.5%
  • Thanked: 260 times
  • forum grump
Re: Family claim Amber Alert ruptured son's eardrums
« Reply #3 on: 07/05/2024 22:10:01 »
No. The peak pressure is the only criterion of concern. I don't see any small audio device having anything near the peak pressure needed to actually rupture a human eardrum.
Logged
Did I really say that?
 

Offline SkepticalDebunker (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 47
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Family claim Amber Alert ruptured son's eardrums
« Reply #4 on: 07/05/2024 23:28:39 »
According to this, 150 decibels can cause eardrum rupture:

https://www.chem.purdue.edu/chemsafety/Training/PPETrain/dblevels.htm

Also found another article on the lawsuit which provides photos and a video:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10830803/Boy-suffered-ruptured-ear-drum-hearing-loss-Apple-AirPods-blared-Amber-Alert.html
Logged
 



Offline SkepticalDebunker (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 47
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Family claim Amber Alert ruptured son's eardrums
« Reply #5 on: 08/05/2024 05:46:19 »
Asked my friend, who is an audiologist, what she thinks of this case. She messaged me back with this

"This is nonsense and reeks of a hoax. The SPL required to shatter an eardrum is around 160 dB, which is equivalent to the SPL of a gunshot fired close to you. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/when-using-headphones-to-listen-to-music-how-loud-it-too-loud-for-kids/ mentions that the top volume level on Apple music players is 102 dB. The volume required to cause rupture of an eardrum is almost 10,000,000,000 times louder. The photos could be of somebody else's child, or a routine hearing test. There's not a single case in the literature of eardrum ruptures happening at only 102 dB. There's no reason that Amber Alerts would be any more damaging than any other similarly loud noise. This is like claiming that a bb gun pellet tore your arm off."
Logged
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21155
  • Activity:
    73.5%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: Family claim Amber Alert ruptured son's eardrums
« Reply #6 on: 08/05/2024 17:56:39 »
Hearing loss, perhaps, probably due to chronic use of earbuds. Rupture? I think not.
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline SkepticalDebunker (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 47
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Family claim Amber Alert ruptured son's eardrums
« Reply #7 on: 09/05/2024 21:52:06 »
Okay, so most sources say that the sound required to cause eardrum rupture is around 160 decibels.

Are the Airpods capable of producing 160 dB?
Logged
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21155
  • Activity:
    73.5%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: Family claim Amber Alert ruptured son's eardrums
« Reply #8 on: 10/05/2024 20:25:02 »
No.
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 1.321 seconds with 44 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.