The Naked Scientists
Toggle navigation
Login
Register
Podcasts
The Naked Scientists
eLife
Naked Genetics
Naked Astronomy
In short
Naked Neuroscience
Ask! The Naked Scientists
Question of the Week
Archive
Video
SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
Articles
Science News
Features
Interviews
Answers to Science Questions
Get Naked
Donate
Do an Experiment
Science Forum
Ask a Question
About
Meet the team
Our Sponsors
Site Map
Contact us
User menu
Login
Register
Search
Home
Help
Search
Tags
Recent Topics
Login
Register
Naked Science Forum
Non Life Sciences
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
Home nuclear plant
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Home nuclear plant
6 Replies
4275 Views
0 Tags
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
set fair
(OP)
Sr. Member
467
Activity:
0.5%
Thanked: 19 times
Naked Science Forum Newbie
Home nuclear plant
«
on:
13/05/2024 16:02:05 »
How much Silicon 32 would you need to power a home?
Logged
alancalverd
Global Moderator
Naked Science Forum GOD!
21159
Activity:
72.5%
Thanked: 60 times
Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: Home nuclear plant
«
Reply #1 on:
13/05/2024 17:12:28 »
The decay of each nucleus delivers about 3 x 10
-14
joules, or 10
-23
MWh
The average consumption of a UK house is about 15 MWh per year so you need 15 x 10
23
Si nuclei to decay per year.
Conveniently, Avogadro tells us that 32 g of Si contains around 6 x 10
23
atoms so that 's 2.5 x 32 = 80 grams per year.
Given the halflife of about 150 years, around 12 kg will supply the energy you need for the probable 100 year life of a house, but, annoyingly, most of it will be delivered in the first year!
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
Bored chemist
Naked Science Forum GOD!
31101
Activity:
11.5%
Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Home nuclear plant
«
Reply #2 on:
13/05/2024 18:08:58 »
Another way to look at that is "enough for about a million* dirty bombs" which is why you will never get hold of it.
* The million is a baseless guess, but the point stands
15 x 10^23 Si nuclei to decay per year.
I may have lost track of the zeroes, but about 5X 10^ 16 Bq
About 2.5 million times more than this
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/jan/31/what-is-the-radioactive-capsule-missing-in-wa-used-for-and-how-dangerous-is-it
About 1.3 MCi or about a million million smoke detectors' worth.
Nope.
«
Last Edit: 13/05/2024 18:21:30 by
Bored chemist
»
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
paul cotter
Naked Science Forum King!
2320
Activity:
31.5%
Thanked: 260 times
forum grump
Re: Home nuclear plant
«
Reply #3 on:
13/05/2024 20:23:12 »
What form does the 3x10exp-14J occur in? Is it in the β, the γ would be problematic. Why not go for plutonium(238?) with a similar half life and thermal output. And finally why does the latex work for Alan and not for me?
Logged
Did I really say that?
alancalverd
Global Moderator
Naked Science Forum GOD!
21159
Activity:
72.5%
Thanked: 60 times
Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: Home nuclear plant
«
Reply #4 on:
13/05/2024 23:57:47 »
Latex? I think you are confusing this thread with the one about idiots and condoms. Seriously, though, I just use the "preview" command and "sup".
The principal decay of Si32 seems to be beta, most of which is going to be absorbed in the rest of the 12 kg lump, and the surface emission will be pretty much mopped up with an aluminum/lead/stainless steel shell. The resulting1.7 kW of heat can then be used directly in a water boiler. My 1.5 kW tea urn died yesterday at the start of a jazz concert! Can Amazon deliver 12 kg of Si32 for less than 50 pounds to repair it?
Problem is that we like to use electricity for other things than central heating and making tea, so you would probably need another 6 kg lump driving a Stirling engine or thermopile to run the telly and stuff.
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
The following users thanked this post:
paul cotter
paul cotter
Naked Science Forum King!
2320
Activity:
31.5%
Thanked: 260 times
forum grump
Re: Home nuclear plant
«
Reply #5 on:
14/05/2024 07:23:54 »
Thank you, Alan, you hit the nail on the head, all this talk of condoms has seeped into my brain or what is left of it. Despite having worked in technology all my life I remain largely computer illiterate: for example I have never owned a smartphone and I don't use email(prefer female!). So what is "sup"?
Logged
Did I really say that?
alancalverd
Global Moderator
Naked Science Forum GOD!
21159
Activity:
72.5%
Thanked: 60 times
Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: Home nuclear plant
«
Reply #6 on:
14/05/2024 08:48:30 »
Assuming you are using the standard Naked Scientists forum page, if you type a response into the "quick reply " box and press "preview" it takes you to a panel with a number of Word-like text options, some of which actually work, like B for bold, I for italic, Greek alphabet, and the vital sup(erscript) and sub(script) buttons.
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
The following users thanked this post:
paul cotter
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tags:
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...