The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Technology
  4. Would this fly?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Would this fly?

  • 1 Replies
  • 7055 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline set fair (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 467
  • Activity:
    0.5%
  • Thanked: 19 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Would this fly?
« on: 07/07/2024 04:03:40 »
If you made a disc which was like a squashed WWII British army helmet on the top and flat on the bottom and set it spinning, I think it should rise because the air would move faster over the top because of its greater surface area. So suppose you made a bunch of discs on a common axis with a motor and enclosed all this in a tube. You could arange gears so that alternate discs spin in opposite directions if you wanted. Would it fly?
« Last Edit: 07/07/2024 04:14:23 by set fair »
Logged
 



Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21157
  • Activity:
    71.5%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: Would this fly?
« Reply #1 on: 08/07/2024 09:29:23 »
If the atmosphere is sufficiently dense, yes.  There are various forms of centrifugal separator for oil/water, milk/cream and suchlike, that effectively induce radial flow over a spinning disc, and thus effectively reduce the pressure above the disc, but when dealing with a low viscosity, low density material like terrestrial air, it's a lot easier to use a thin aerofoil like a propellor or helicopter rotor,

Leonardo da Vinci sketched a contra-rotor helicopter, and I think the Russian military use them - no asymmetric torque makes them easier to fly. Contrarotating propellors confer high efficiency over a limited range of speeds and were used on the Gannet and Shackleton marine patrol aircraft.
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.67 seconds with 27 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.