The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. General Discussion & Feedback
  3. Just Chat!
  4. Copout 29 on the way, what do you think?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Copout 29 on the way, what do you think?

  • 11 Replies
  • 4838 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline paul cotter (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2317
  • Activity:
    31%
  • Thanked: 260 times
  • forum grump
Copout 29 on the way, what do you think?
« on: 29/10/2024 12:21:27 »
Here we are, heading for another copout, will it be as stunningly successful as copout 28? Just to be clear, I am a fully paid-up card carrying member of the cynic party. Did anyone happen to see the "AISEG" generator shown at last year's conference? This free energy doohickey will solve the world energy shortage and it's inventors have discovered 12 new laws of physics including the critical "bandwagon" effect!! How the hell does crap like this get displayed at this, or any other conference? Am I on the right planet?
Logged
Did I really say that?
 



Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21146
  • Activity:
    72%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: Copout 29 on the way, what do you think?
« Reply #1 on: 29/10/2024 16:55:57 »
Amazing technological breakthrough! When I played the YouTube clips, I could actually smell the bullshit!

And isn't that what COP is all about?
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 
The following users thanked this post: paul cotter

Offline Petrochemicals

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3629
  • Activity:
    8%
  • Thanked: 182 times
  • forum overlord
Re: Copout 29 on the way, what do you think?
« Reply #2 on: 29/10/2024 17:19:51 »
Quote from: paul cotter on 29/10/2024 12:21:27
card carrying member
Your card was probably made in china using coal, along with your iphone and almost everything in your house.
Logged
For reasons of repetitive antagonism, this user is currently not responding to messages from;
BoredChemist
To ignore someone too, go to your profile settings>modifyprofie>ignore!
 

Offline paul cotter (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2317
  • Activity:
    31%
  • Thanked: 260 times
  • forum grump
Re: Copout 29 on the way, what do you think?
« Reply #3 on: 29/10/2024 22:34:13 »
Wrong!, Petro, I don't have an I-phone(or any other smart phone) and never have had one. Forgot to mention I am also a luddite.
Logged
Did I really say that?
 

Offline Petrochemicals

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3629
  • Activity:
    8%
  • Thanked: 182 times
  • forum overlord
Re: Copout 29 on the way, what do you think?
« Reply #4 on: 30/10/2024 14:01:10 »
Quote from: paul cotter on 29/10/2024 22:34:13
Wrong!, Petro, I don't have an I-phone(or any other smart phone) and never have had one. Forgot to mention I am also a luddite.
2 out of 3 isnt bad.
Logged
For reasons of repetitive antagonism, this user is currently not responding to messages from;
BoredChemist
To ignore someone too, go to your profile settings>modifyprofie>ignore!
 



Offline paul cotter (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2317
  • Activity:
    31%
  • Thanked: 260 times
  • forum grump
Re: Copout 29 on the way, what do you think?
« Reply #5 on: 08/11/2024 09:28:22 »
Surely Trump's re-election will cripple any possibility of a move to reduce fossil fuel use? The world at the present time is plagued with populist leaders whose only motivation is to stay in power and the best way to stay in power is to maintain cheap fuel prices. I can't see anything useful coming from this and it has always been my opinion that these conferences are a waste of time, space and energy as human nature dictates that selfish actions will always scupper any possible meaningful agreement. Rant over.
Logged
Did I really say that?
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21146
  • Activity:
    72%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: Copout 29 on the way, what do you think?
« Reply #6 on: 10/11/2024 17:00:57 »
Fossil fuel will eventually disappear anyway, and in the short term will become uneconomic. It is already politically undesirable. The sensible thing to do is to work on alternatives, not attend fatuous conferences about the inevitable.
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline paul cotter (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2317
  • Activity:
    31%
  • Thanked: 260 times
  • forum grump
Re: Copout 29 on the way, what do you think?
« Reply #7 on: 10/11/2024 20:03:51 »
Agreed.
Logged
Did I really say that?
 

Offline paul cotter (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2317
  • Activity:
    31%
  • Thanked: 260 times
  • forum grump
Re: Copout 29 on the way, what do you think?
« Reply #8 on: 22/11/2024 13:29:25 »
Looks like a fudge is on the cards, not for the first time.
Logged
Did I really say that?
 



Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21146
  • Activity:
    72%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: Copout 29 on the way, what do you think?
« Reply #9 on: 22/11/2024 22:45:56 »
I have just discovered a 50,000 year old set of committee minutes.

On behalf of what may become Great Britain, Ug said "It is time for the bloated plutocrats of Australia to cough up loads of wonga  to compensate me and my banker chums for the total destruction of our island by the forthcoming ice sheet. The inventors of the boomerang have a social duty to part with their excessive profits and our crap weather is all their fault."   

In reply, Og said "Look, mate, we have our own problems. The inland sea is evaporating and we're going to be left with a bloody great desert and some inedible spiders. The last thing we want is for the coastal strip to be invaded by Pommie crooks looking for cheap sunshine and melanoma. Stick to your flat beer, stop whingeing, and don't misappropriate our lingo."
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline Petrochemicals

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3629
  • Activity:
    8%
  • Thanked: 182 times
  • forum overlord
Re: Copout 29 on the way, what do you think?
« Reply #10 on: 22/11/2024 23:27:54 »
I imagine COP29 has been going 29 years. 29 years is a long time, long enough to change, long enough to conclude that COP is useless. In 29 years we could make the UK carbon free.

« Last Edit: 24/11/2024 00:00:11 by Petrochemicals »
Logged
For reasons of repetitive antagonism, this user is currently not responding to messages from;
BoredChemist
To ignore someone too, go to your profile settings>modifyprofie>ignore!
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21146
  • Activity:
    72%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: Copout 29 on the way, what do you think?
« Reply #11 on: 23/11/2024 22:45:28 »
In 2005 I published a short paper explaining how to reduce anthropogenic CO2 emission rates by 25% at no net cost to anyone's lifestyle, by a procedure that, if (as I predicted) it failed to produce any useful effect , could be completely reversed in a few years.

My proposal was supported by the World Bank, the UK Treasury, and pressure groups around the world, but would have eliminated the need for political grandstanding and (if my hypothesis was correct) possibly demolished the careers of a few scaremongers and climate "scientists", so it was never adopted as official policy by any government.
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 1.279 seconds with 53 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.