The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. General Discussion & Feedback
  3. Just Chat!
  4. Should Damage To The Prefrontal Lobe Be A Legal Defense?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Should Damage To The Prefrontal Lobe Be A Legal Defense?

  • 2 Replies
  • 3228 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Jimbee (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 242
  • Activity:
    2%
  • Thanked: 21 times
Should Damage To The Prefrontal Lobe Be A Legal Defense?
« on: 05/12/2024 10:33:24 »
There are a lot areas where science and law interact, and some where they come into conflict. One is the insanity defense. Every nation has had some version of the insanity defense since recorded history. Even the ancient Romans did. Even ancient Islam did. (One message board said the Koran never talks about an insanity defense. I don't know where in the Koran it says that. But I know it has something about an insanity defense. Or maybe diminished capacity.)

Insanity means you couldn't possibly know the difference between right or wrong, or you didn't even know what you were doing or that it was wrong. And the more recent Durham rule says the accused is not responsible if the unlawful act was the product of mental disease or defect. And there is something (that I haven't heard in a long time in my country in any news report) called diminished capacity.

Anyways, on the subject of dimished capacity, I was wondering about behavior issues mentally ill and handicapped people can have that are caused by damage to their prefrontal lobe. Something like a traffic accident could cause it. I've heard it sometimes occurs in intellectual disabilities. And my understanding is that some people just have perhaps smaller brains, or poorly developed prefrontal lobes. The same way the visual or auditory centers of their brain might be poorly developed, though not damaged.

I guess this shouldn't count as insanity. But what about dimished capacity? And I'm curious, how is this handled in other countries? Like Europe, Canada or South America?
« Last Edit: 05/12/2024 10:36:06 by Jimbee »
Logged
 



Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21146
  • Activity:
    71%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: Should Damage To The Prefrontal Lobe Be A Legal Defense?
« Reply #1 on: 05/12/2024 11:26:11 »
Insanity or diminished capacity should alter the charge but not the verdict. Murder, for instance, requires proof of intent, whereas manslaughter or unlawful killing simply requires proof of action.

"Genetic predisposition" was occasionally offered as a defence in the USA until a Texas court ruled that uncontrollable genetic predisposition to killing warranted an automatic death sentence for the protection of the public.
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline Petrochemicals

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3629
  • Activity:
    8%
  • Thanked: 182 times
  • forum overlord
Re: Should Damage To The Prefrontal Lobe Be A Legal Defense?
« Reply #2 on: 05/12/2024 15:38:23 »
All depends if it affects you, some peoples brain can rewire some do not, it is usually decided on mental capability than physical evidence, the brain is still a great unknown.

https://www.newsweek.com/miracle-boy-born-no-brain-grows-back-1338637
Logged
For reasons of repetitive antagonism, this user is currently not responding to messages from;
BoredChemist
To ignore someone too, go to your profile settings>modifyprofie>ignore!
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.365 seconds with 32 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.