The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. General Discussion & Feedback
  3. Just Chat!
  4. What Error In Logic Did Tweedledee Make?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

What Error In Logic Did Tweedledee Make?

  • 2 Replies
  • 2405 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Jimbee (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 242
  • Activity:
    2%
  • Thanked: 21 times
What Error In Logic Did Tweedledee Make?
« on: 01/05/2025 22:24:55 »
"Contrariwise," continued Tweedledee, "if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic."

From Through The Looking-Glass by Lewis Carroll.

Through The Looking-Glass was meant for children. But Carroll incorporated logic into his children's books like in Alice's Adventures in Wonderland and Through the Looking-Glass. He was also a mathematician and logician. In fact, my 8th teacher said some colleges have his children's novels as required reading for this reason.

What error in logic is Tweedledee making here? I took a community college logic class in 1998. And I found it very interesting. Everything that is written has an underlying logic to it. Also, we learned that statements can be logical even if their information is false. And they can be illogical even if their conclusions are correct. For example we learned

All Martians wear purple pajamas.
 Stanley is a Martian.
Therefore Stanley wears purple pajamas.

Is logically correct, even if the information in it is all false. But

All presidents of the United States are or were Americans.
 Donald Trump is an American.
Therefore Donald Trump is the president.

Is logically wrong. Donald Trump is just coincidentally president and an American. All Americans are not automatically president. (I said this on another message board and a poster said I was wrong. It has been a long time since I took that class. But I think I am correct with that.)

So what error did Tweedledee make? Inductive logic? I remember reading somewhere that is incorrect. But I forget the details.
« Last Edit: 01/05/2025 22:28:14 by Jimbee »
Logged
 



Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    13%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: What Error In Logic Did Tweedledee Make?
« Reply #1 on: 01/05/2025 23:42:40 »
All Martians wear purple pajamas.
 Stanley is a Martian.
Therefore Stanley wears purple pajamas.

Is logically correct, even if the information in it is all false. But

All presidents of the United States are or were Americans.
 Donald Trump is an American.
Therefore Donald Trump is the president.

The mistake is not recognising that
"All presidents are Americans " is not the same as "All Americans are presidents".
The word order matters.

* trump martian.jpg (41.82 kB . 469x225 - viewed 259 times)

All Martians wear purple pajamas.
"Martians" comes before "wearers of purple pjs."

But in
All presidents of the United States are or were Americans.
"Americans" comes after "presidents"

Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21146
  • Activity:
    72%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: What Error In Logic Did Tweedledee Make?
« Reply #2 on: 04/05/2025 17:05:19 »
The essence of the democratic process is that anyone can become president of the USA.

Der Furhrer Trumpf is living proof, though it could be argued that the effective POTUS is Vladimir Putin, who owns the majority of Trumpf.

However the logical fallacy is in confusing a subset with a superset. "A contains B" is clearly not equivalent to "B contains A".
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.733 seconds with 34 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.