The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. General Discussion & Feedback
  3. Just Chat!
  4. What are they burning, acetylene?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

What are they burning, acetylene?

  • 14 Replies
  • 5448 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline paul cotter (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2317
  • Activity:
    31%
  • Thanked: 260 times
  • forum grump
What are they burning, acetylene?
« on: 08/05/2025 12:13:50 »
Not that the pope has any relevance to my life but I noticed a cloud of vile pollution emanating from the Vatican, on the gogglebox. That sort of black smoke is like what one gets with a welding torch before the oxygen is switched on. Or maybe an aromatic like styrene or polystyrene. Whatever it is the environmental agencies need to put a stop to such deliberate pollution.
Logged
Did I really say that?
 



Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    13%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: What are they burning, acetylene?
« Reply #1 on: 08/05/2025 14:22:07 »
The smoke is "traditionally" from burning the ballot papers.

But
"For black smoke, a mix of potassium perchlorate, anthracene, and sulfur is burned - producing thick, dark smoke.

"For white smoke, a combination of potassium chlorate, lactose, and pine rosin, is used, which burns clean and pale.

"In the past they tried to burn damp straw to create a darker smoke and dry straw to make lighter smoke - but this caused some confusion because sometimes it appeared grey."

From
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cp31gnn93kvo

And I suspect  smoke from anthracene is full of nasty PAH compounds.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 
The following users thanked this post: paul cotter

Offline paul cotter (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2317
  • Activity:
    31%
  • Thanked: 260 times
  • forum grump
Re: What are they burning, acetylene?
« Reply #2 on: 08/05/2025 17:06:11 »
A well mixed concoction of anhydrous lactose and potassium chlorate could send one to the promised land, regardless of who has been elected. Second thoughts, does lactose form a hydrate?, maybe it's glucose i'm thinking of- one of them does and it's mix with chlorate is quite lame. Burning anthracene, even with a perchlorate is obviously an environmental sin of grievous magnitude.
Logged
Did I really say that?
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    13%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: What are they burning, acetylene?
« Reply #3 on: 08/05/2025 17:41:29 »
Quote from: paul cotter on 08/05/2025 17:06:11
A well mixed concoction of anhydrous lactose and potassium chlorate could send one to the promised land, regardless of who has been elected. Second thoughts, does lactose form a hydrate?, maybe it's glucose i'm thinking of- one of them does and it's mix with chlorate is quite lame.

Further discussion on that topic might get people into trouble.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline paul cotter (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2317
  • Activity:
    31%
  • Thanked: 260 times
  • forum grump
Re: What are they burning, acetylene?
« Reply #4 on: 08/05/2025 18:07:16 »
Point taken, BC. It was just an observation and I have no intention of elaborating or taking it further.
Logged
Did I really say that?
 



Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21146
  • Activity:
    72%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: What are they burning, acetylene?
« Reply #5 on: 08/05/2025 21:32:09 »
I recently visited an airfield where "They" scrapped the old diesel crew bus "because of Emissions" and replaced it with a smaller and unreliable electric vehicle to take folks out to the apron where various passenger jets and precious warbirds were burning umpteen liters of oil products per minute just warming up and taxying to the runway before departing in a veil of smoke.   
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline paul cotter (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2317
  • Activity:
    31%
  • Thanked: 260 times
  • forum grump
Re: What are they burning, acetylene?
« Reply #6 on: 08/05/2025 22:03:57 »
If I was tasked with the environmentally safe production of a black effluent I would rig a powerful centrifugal blower to the chimney and feed carbon black into the inlet, with the motor running. White smoke could similarly produced with titanium dioxide, maybe flour if they are financially challenged.
Logged
Did I really say that?
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21146
  • Activity:
    72%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: What are they burning, acetylene?
« Reply #7 on: 09/05/2025 19:34:06 »
Aagh! Particulates! And flour is wonderfully explosive if sufficiently aerated - like by blowing it up a chimney.

Whatever you do is bound to upset somebody. But it won't kill nearly as many people as christianity has. 
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline paul cotter (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2317
  • Activity:
    31%
  • Thanked: 260 times
  • forum grump
Re: What are they burning, acetylene?
« Reply #8 on: 09/05/2025 21:25:59 »
Yep, flour mill explosions have been devastating. Okay, i'll go with titanium dioxide then, it is certainly better than the old style white pigment lead carbonate.
Logged
Did I really say that?
 



Offline Petrochemicals

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3629
  • Activity:
    8%
  • Thanked: 182 times
  • forum overlord
Re: What are they burning, acetylene?
« Reply #9 on: 09/05/2025 23:55:35 »
Tyres and crack.
Logged
For reasons of repetitive antagonism, this user is currently not responding to messages from;
BoredChemist
To ignore someone too, go to your profile settings>modifyprofie>ignore!
 

Offline Petrochemicals

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3629
  • Activity:
    8%
  • Thanked: 182 times
  • forum overlord
Re: What are they burning, acetylene?
« Reply #10 on: 09/05/2025 23:57:55 »
Quote from: paul cotter on 09/05/2025 21:25:59
Yep, flour mill explosions have been devastating. Okay, i'll go with titanium dioxide then, it is certainly better than the old style white pigment lead carbonate.
any combustible areated, if fine enough to cause the reaction to be self sustaining.

Iron burns in air if fine enough.
Logged
For reasons of repetitive antagonism, this user is currently not responding to messages from;
BoredChemist
To ignore someone too, go to your profile settings>modifyprofie>ignore!
 

Offline paul cotter (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2317
  • Activity:
    31%
  • Thanked: 260 times
  • forum grump
Re: What are they burning, acetylene?
« Reply #11 on: 10/05/2025 14:05:26 »
"Tyres and crack", hmm, that's an odd choice. Tyres certainly would deliver the black smoke but crack for the white?? I am assuming here you are referring to crack cocaine: I have never seen crack being vapourised and I would beat a hasty retreat from any location where this practice was occurring. However I would imagine cocaine vapour, if pure, would be slightly misty at most and certainly not up to the description of white smoke. As regards iron it is actually pyrophoric if pure and finely divided.
Logged
Did I really say that?
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21146
  • Activity:
    72%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: What are they burning, acetylene?
« Reply #12 on: 10/05/2025 22:15:49 »
Time was, of course, that they burned heretics for the greater glory of a loving and merciful god, but AFAIK the color of the smoke was independent of the color of the victim. 
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 



Offline paul cotter (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2317
  • Activity:
    31%
  • Thanked: 260 times
  • forum grump
Re: What are they burning, acetylene?
« Reply #13 on: 11/05/2025 17:09:14 »
I have a solution for that. Burn the heretics and infidels with an excess of oxygen for a light coloured smoke and incinerate with insufficient oxygen for a darker smoke. Ok, not quite black and white but it should do. I think I will trying selling my invention to the new pope. I am quite sure they would like to resurrect the inquisition.
Logged
Did I really say that?
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21146
  • Activity:
    72%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: What are they burning, acetylene?
« Reply #14 on: 12/05/2025 07:47:40 »
Quote
incinerate with insufficient oxygen
and incite the wrath of the carbon monoxide police.....
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 2.129 seconds with 62 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.