The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. General Science
  3. General Science
  4. Can you calculate s.g. empirically ?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Can you calculate s.g. empirically ?

  • 3 Replies
  • 6648 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Les the Scientist (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 39
  • Activity:
    0%
Can you calculate s.g. empirically ?
« on: 29/04/2004 01:53:43 »
Right a 50:50 weight mixture of MeOH and EtOH.

MeOH has an s.g. of 0.791 g/ml
EtOH has an s.g. of 0.789 g/ml

Now I thought you could simply do a quick calculation to work out your new specific gravity.  In this case 0.790 g/ml.

A lad here at work says it doesn't work in practice.  Is he right ?

Like spirit levels, not too keen on chives though.
Logged
 
 



Offline gsmollin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 749
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
Re: Can you calculate s.g. empirically ?
« Reply #1 on: 29/04/2004 17:18:28 »
Conservation of mass tells us that the mass of the mixture or solution is the same as the mass of the constituents. It does not tell us anything about volume changes, however. For instance, water has a density of 1 g/ml. Dissolve some salt in it, and the density increases, but it is not the weighted average of the constituents. If you mix salt with sand, the density of the mixture is the weighted average of the density of the constituents. The difference is that in a solution, there is a phase change occuring in the constituents, which can affect their volumes. In a mixture, there is no phase change, so the densities remain the same.

OBTW, s.g. is a dimensionless ratio of density divided by density of water. You are using straight densities.
« Last Edit: 29/04/2004 17:26:48 by gsmollin »
Logged
"F = ma, E = mc^2, and you can't push a string."
 

Offline Les the Scientist (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 39
  • Activity:
    0%
Re: Can you calculate s.g. empirically ?
« Reply #2 on: 29/04/2004 20:36:02 »
Right ok then so obviously it doesn't work for dissolving solids in liquids but in the case of mixing oraganic liquids it does work yeah ?

50g of MeOH - 63.21 mls
50g of EtOH - 63.37 mls

Total weight 100g, Total Volume 126.58 mls

density of mixture = 100/126.58 = 0.790 g/ml

Logged
 
 

Offline gsmollin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 749
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
Re: Can you calculate s.g. empirically ?
« Reply #3 on: 30/04/2004 01:52:29 »
Is that a question or a statement. I can't say it is true for organic liquids, in general. I can't say it is always false either. I'm surprised some chemist hasn't weighed in (little pun, snork-snork}.
Logged
"F = ma, E = mc^2, and you can't push a string."
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 1.548 seconds with 32 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.