The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Technology
  4. Best structure for a ship
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Best structure for a ship

  • 12 Replies
  • 14890 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Garabato (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 17
  • Activity:
    0%
Best structure for a ship
« on: 30/08/2007 02:17:28 »
I heard somewhere that a box-liked structure is better for resistance for a charge vehicle in the seas.

¿Is this true?
Logged
 



Offline JimBob

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6543
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 9 times
  • Moderator
Best structure for a ship
« Reply #1 on: 30/08/2007 02:43:26 »
Hi Garabato

GREAT to have you with us and a sincere welcome from me!

I am not sure what you mean by a "charge vehicle."
Logged
The mind is like a parachute. It works best when open.  -- A. Einstein
 

Offline Garabato (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 17
  • Activity:
    0%
Best structure for a ship
« Reply #2 on: 31/08/2007 00:08:44 »
A wood ship to carry something (materials, people, animals, etc).

I was told that a box-liked desing was great to prevent separation between joints, especially in the heavy seas.  So a wood ship like the ark didn't required reinforcing with iron straps and leak.

Im in the midlle of some kind of debate about a global flood and this has been summed up.

Thanks for the welcome BTW     
Logged
 

another_someone

  • Guest
Best structure for a ship
« Reply #3 on: 31/08/2007 00:18:52 »
A lot depends on the materials and structures you use to build a vessel - different materials have different strengths, and thus are suitable for different shapes; but in general, the strongest shape will be a sphere.

Some materials do not lend themselves well to forming curved surfaces, and so for such materials creating other shapes might be a suitable compromise.
« Last Edit: 31/08/2007 00:20:53 by another_someone »
Logged
 

paul.fr

  • Guest
Best structure for a ship
« Reply #4 on: 31/08/2007 00:23:55 »
i may be having one of my "moments", but i don't quite get the question. Are you asking if the ship should box like ie square, or that the joints in quality box's are suited to boat building, like dovetails for example?

If you are talking joints free from nails and straps then you only have to look at viking longboats, or how american indians and other tribespeople have and still do make canoes.

there really is an art and a simplicity to how they are done.
Logged
 



paul.fr

  • Guest
Best structure for a ship
« Reply #5 on: 31/08/2007 00:39:40 »
Quote from: another_someone on 31/08/2007 00:18:52

Some materials do not lend themselves well to forming curved surfaces

True, but wood can be manipulated in to a "boat shape". This can take a long time depending on the type of wood.
Logged
 

Offline DoctorBeaver

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 12653
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • A stitch in time would have confused Einstein.
Best structure for a ship
« Reply #6 on: 31/08/2007 07:23:13 »
Paul - Drakkar (Viking longships) were nailed. They were clinker-built with the overlapping planks nailed in place. Here's a nice article about them...
http://www.stemnet.nf.ca/CITE/v_drakkar.htm
Logged
 

paul.fr

  • Guest
Best structure for a ship
« Reply #7 on: 31/08/2007 08:22:02 »
My mistake, Doc. There is a good reason for the error  - i am thick! But nobody listens to me any way so i can get away with it...most times.
Logged
 

Offline DoctorBeaver

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 12653
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • A stitch in time would have confused Einstein.
Best structure for a ship
« Reply #8 on: 31/08/2007 08:50:03 »
Quote from: paul.fr on 31/08/2007 08:22:02
My mistake, Doc. There is a good reason for the error  - i am thick! But nobody listens to me any way so i can get away with it...most times.

I know the feeling.

P.S. Good morning
Logged
 



paul.fr

  • Guest
Best structure for a ship
« Reply #9 on: 31/08/2007 08:59:32 »
Good morning, Doc.
Logged
 

another_someone

  • Guest
Best structure for a ship
« Reply #10 on: 31/08/2007 12:10:30 »
Quote from: paul.fr on 31/08/2007 00:39:40
Quote from: another_someone on 31/08/2007 00:18:52

Some materials do not lend themselves well to forming curved surfaces

True, but wood can be manipulated in to a "boat shape". This can take a long time depending on the type of wood.

Certainly, wood can be formed into a curve in one dimension, but I have yet to see wood (not plywood) forming a two dimensional curve.  In any case, no wooden structure has ever formed a continuous spherical shape (i.e. you always require joins that provide week points in the structure - this often being overcome to some extent by creating overlaps, such as clinkering, but this can scarcely be regarded as a continuous curve).
Logged
 

Offline daveshorts

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2568
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Physics, Experiments
    • http://www.chaosscience.org.uk
Best structure for a ship
« Reply #11 on: 31/08/2007 23:22:10 »
Actually the structural design of ships up to just after the Napoleonic wars (early 19th Century) was not very good, They were built with lots of right angled joints making lots of squares. A square is very bad at resisting being converted into a parallelagram which meant that despite the fact that they used huge timbers the ships were constantly changing shape which meant that you couldn't make them waterproof because the distance between the planks kept changing.
This is why they had to be constantly pumped out which without powered pumps was very laborious.
 It also meant that you couldn't build fast long narrow hull shapes because the hull would tend to hogg - the bow and stern would bend downwards.

In the early 19th century a Naval architect suddenly noticed this and started putting diagonal bracing into the design, at which point the ships could be made 50% longer so they sailed faster, and they didn't leak nearly as much. Fairly soon after this wood was replaced with iron as the building material of choice.
Logged
 

Offline DoctorBeaver

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 12653
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • A stitch in time would have confused Einstein.
Best structure for a ship
« Reply #12 on: 01/09/2007 00:03:18 »
I didn't realise the design had changed that late. Thanks for the info, Dave.
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.357 seconds with 57 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.