0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Would be wrong to assume that C of gravity does not compress matter, but that instead assume that "C of gravity spins energy". Gravity spins the energy that matter? Therefore matter is not related directly with gravity. Matter being a final product of spinning C state of energy in function of gravity, and once again, the final product being recycled from outside in the very system that has created it?
The Box : I personally feel that charge stops total compression of matter because charge is opposed to charge. What do you think?
Quote The Box : I personally feel that charge stops total compression of matter because charge is opposed to charge. What do you think? Very close to it, I think. The number of scientists who agree on the basic scenario that electromagnetism was involved in gravity are too many to even begin to list here. In Particular those scientists including Poincare who were responsible for the eventual and unintentional revival of the aether theory in the form of relativity. Relativity was originally formulated as a means to to explain why the aether was undetectable.
Gravity is an attraction followed by a repulsion,
According to GR, it is spacetime curvature. Spacetime looks curved arround matter. From this perspective, I think that actually gravity shouldn't literally compress matter. Matter looks compressed if viewed from a distance, but space itself should compress not matter. Another problem is what is matter? Compressing matter perhaps doesn't make sense. For example if we consider particles unidimensional, there is nothing to compress but space between particles. Compressing atoms makes sense because we know the occupy a certain volume. Anyway I don't have a clear view on this. If we consider spacetime flat, then gravity becomes a force that acts on anything that has energy or momentum. We don't feel gravity because it acts evenly throughout our entire body, but we do feel the forces that oppose gravity which create pressure regions . I'm not sure if this is commonly accepted but I think it is correct. It is interesting that Einstein used the analogy to acceleration figure it out, because it doesn't necessarily need to be equivalent to acceleration, therefore there is a higher chance spacetime is flat. The fact that gravity can bend light is not a reason to believe spacetime is curved, although it is a nice concept. If you ask me, in fact I think everything is made of EM waves, and OAM light beams not only curve or redshift as they travel in an gravitational field but they can also stop for a moment and turn back towards the field generator, just like matter does. From my point of view, gravity is either a flow of the medium that enables propagation of waves of matter and light, or possibly an effect of waves interferences.Gravity can easily overwhelm forces generated by charges. Charge forces don't keep electrons from falling into the nucleus. The wave behaviour of electrons explains what happens.I think that atoms can compress if they loose energy. Basically they radiate constantly but if you prevent the incomming radiaton away from them, they cool down. If the temperature of a system is reduced below 10K, the atoms start to behave differently. This make atoms occupy a smaller volume. I think it may be a key to understanding how matter collapses forming BH. Perhaps atoms form a sort of BEC that becomes too dense and massive to be recovered.
Idea - Could we place a low mass magnet on a sheet of ice and move the magnet by using light?
Quote from: Thebox on 06/04/2017 23:27:18Idea - Could we place a low mass magnet on a sheet of ice and move the magnet by using light?The magnet is made of matter, therefore light will give it a little kick. A demagmetised magnet would probably be pushed with the same force.Even atoms act like little magnets, therefore your low mass magnet can be a single atom.
Quote from: Nilak on 06/04/2017 23:49:06Quote from: Thebox on 06/04/2017 23:27:18Idea - Could we place a low mass magnet on a sheet of ice and move the magnet by using light?The magnet is made of matter, therefore light will give it a little kick. A demagmetised magnet would probably be pushed with the same force.Even atoms act like little magnets, therefore your low mass magnet can be a single atom. So how easy would it be for light to push a planet if the planet was not under any inertia?
Here are some thoughts about gravity:https://dwgtheory.quora.com/A-hypothesis-on-how-gravity-workshttps://dwgtheory.quora.com/Gravity-could-be-a-consequence-of-electromagnetic-field-interference
Quote from: Thebox on 06/04/2017 23:51:00Quote from: Nilak on 06/04/2017 23:49:06Quote from: Thebox on 06/04/2017 23:27:18Idea - Could we place a low mass magnet on a sheet of ice and move the magnet by using light?The magnet is made of matter, therefore light will give it a little kick. A demagmetised magnet would probably be pushed with the same force.Even atoms act like little magnets, therefore your low mass magnet can be a single atom. So how easy would it be for light to push a planet if the planet was not under any inertia?Yes, but it wouldn't be a planet anymore, with no inertial mass. But, what is the point?