0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Right, to look for evidence if my statement was true we would test the statement. Space cannot be destroyed So how would we test this ? We would try to destroy it right ? If we could not destroy it that would be evidence it cannot be destroyed .
Well there is no weapon that destroy space
there is no act of nature that can destroy space, there is no act in the Universe that can destroy space
I can't even destroy space using my mind and thinking.
There is not a single way to destroy space.
Even if we were to contract space back to a single point, the point is still surrounded by space.
That is evidence and regardless of yourself looking for excuses like the dog ate the homework type excuse, the evidence is overwhelming .
Depends on how thorough you are. If a 5 year-old can't open a medicine bottle, would it be rational to conclude that it cannot be opened at all?
Right, to look for evidence if my statement was true we would test the statement. Space cannot be destroyed So how would we test this ? We would try to destroy it right ? If we could not destroy it that would be evidence it cannot be destroyed . Well there is no weapon that destroy space, there is no act of nature that can destroy space, there is no act in the Universe that can destroy space, I can't even destroy space using my mind and thinking. There is not a single way to destroy space. Even if we were to contract space back to a single point, the point is still surrounded by space. That is evidence and regardless of yourself looking for excuses like the dog ate the homework type excuse, the evidence is overwhelming .
Quote from: Thebox on 13/05/2018 11:47:36Right, to look for evidence if my statement was true we would test the statement. Space cannot be destroyed So how would we test this ? We would try to destroy it right ? If we could not destroy it that would be evidence it cannot be destroyed . Well there is no weapon that destroy space, there is no act of nature that can destroy space, there is no act in the Universe that can destroy space, I can't even destroy space using my mind and thinking. There is not a single way to destroy space. Even if we were to contract space back to a single point, the point is still surrounded by space. That is evidence and regardless of yourself looking for excuses like the dog ate the homework type excuse, the evidence is overwhelming . And yet tomorrow, someone may come up with a way to destroy it.
I am thorough, the proof you have not thought of a way yourself is proof
Nothingness has nothing to destroy and that is the reason nothingness is forever. You can destroy something but with surety you cannot destroy nothing. You can create nothing by destroying something and you can add something to nothing to have something, but removing nothing , displacing nothing, destroying nothing is an impossibility.Think dude!
P.s Accepting this to be true does not alter present physics any.
it gives us the absolute relative rest frame .
Well in about 14 billion years nobody or thing as destroyed it, so I very much doubt it.
"Neither of us can figure it out, so it can't be done" is still the argument from incredulity fallacy. The Big Crunch model does provide a way of destroying space, as the contraction of space is effectively the same as destroying some of it. We don't know if a Big Crunch will actually happen, but at least the physics and math are there (too much gravity forces the Universe to collapse in on itself).
Anyway, the pyramids were built as tombs- they say so.
Quote from: Thebox on 13/05/2018 13:43:50Well in about 14 billion years nobody or thing as destroyed it, so I very much doubt it.How would you know if someone (or something) had destroyed a bit of it somewhere?Anyway, the pyramids were built as tombs- they say so.
Who's they ?
Quote from: Thebox on 13/05/2018 16:57:59Who's they ? The pyramids which have writing in them.Also, the dead bodies are a bit of a give-away.
What about the Philadelphia experiment that used pyramids?
Quote from: Thebox on 13/05/2018 22:05:31What about the Philadelphia experiment that used pyramids? Other science fiction is availablehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Philadelphia_Experiment_(film)Do you realise that sort of thing makes you look silly?
Your doing it again and forgetting what space is,
the big crunch again is based on substance, not space.
Your arguments are invalid arguments, in fact they are not even a counter argument of any description.
I say you can't destroy space, unless you can prove you can or give an argument of how you can, then obviously you can't .
I can't fly, your argument would be I may be able to in the future. Absurdity.
three-dimensional space
It's ok, I am giving up, I am going allow myself to forget science and go and live instead. I have tried to long now so is time I realise it is not going anywhere and give up.
Quote from: Thebox on 13/05/2018 23:04:22It's ok, I am giving up, I am going allow myself to forget science and go and live instead. I have tried to long now so is time I realise it is not going anywhere and give up.Color me skeptical. You'll be back to posting about this kind of stuff again in the future. I have no doubts.
I think maybe realisation needs to take hold of me and give me a kick.
Quote from: Thebox on 13/05/2018 23:25:37I think maybe realisation needs to take hold of me and give me a kick. Sounds good.