The Naked Scientists
Toggle navigation
Login
Register
Podcasts
The Naked Scientists
eLife
Naked Genetics
Naked Astronomy
In short
Naked Neuroscience
Ask! The Naked Scientists
Question of the Week
Archive
Video
SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
Articles
Science News
Features
Interviews
Answers to Science Questions
Get Naked
Donate
Do an Experiment
Science Forum
Ask a Question
About
Meet the team
Our Sponsors
Site Map
Contact us
User menu
Login
Register
Search
Home
Help
Search
Tags
Member Map
Recent Topics
Login
Register
Naked Science Forum
General Discussion & Feedback
Radio Show & Podcast Feedback
Feedback: Population control would have a big impact on climate change
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Feedback: Population control would have a big impact on climate change
3 Replies
2148 Views
0 Tags
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
thedoc
(OP)
Forum Admin
Moderator
Hero Member
510
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 21 times
Feedback: Population control would have a big impact on climate change
«
on:
19/10/2016 17:53:01 »
emily Valentine asked the Naked Scientists:
I heard your
program
last week and your panel said that what was best for the planet ecologically is to eat less meat. I disagree.
Population control and having no children is the best thing you can do to reduce the stress on the environment.
As western societies, we are critical of the Chinese one child policy, yet I wonder where the world would be now without it? How many more Chinese would there be now if the policy had not existed? How big would their population be if they had had children at the same rate as India? Thailand? Brazil? UK? Or Canada?
Population control is never mentioned when discussing sustainability of the Earth, yet it is vital and practiced by many people and societies.
What do you think?
«
Last Edit: 19/10/2016 17:53:01 by _system
»
Logged
alancalverd
Global Moderator
Naked Science Forum GOD!
18608
Activity:
55%
Thanked: 1582 times
life is too short to drink instant coffee
Re: Feedback: Population control would have a big impact on climate change
«
Reply #1 on:
19/10/2016 22:12:04 »
Human breath constitutes about 10% of all anthropogenic carbon dioxide. Animal breath acounts for nearly 25%. So if you believe that CO2 is responsible for climate change, it is actually more effective to change our diet than to limit our population. However if you don't limit the population, both numbers will increase anyway.
Since it costs nothing to do either, we should of course do both. The benefits would be realised immediately
Logged
helping to stem the tide of ignorance
chris
Naked Science Forum King!
8009
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 298 times
The Naked Scientist
Re: Feedback: Population control would have a big impact on climate change
«
Reply #2 on:
20/10/2016 08:16:45 »
Interesting points.
But what mass of CO2 does a human - or a cow - breathe out in a year? And what fraction is this of the 35 billion tonnes of man-made carbon dioxide emitted annually?
Logged
I never forget a face, but in your case I'll make an exception - Groucho Marx -
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/
alancalverd
Global Moderator
Naked Science Forum GOD!
18608
Activity:
55%
Thanked: 1582 times
life is too short to drink instant coffee
Re: Feedback: Population control would have a big impact on climate change
«
Reply #3 on:
01/11/2016 01:34:06 »
10% and 25% respectively.
Practically all "artificial" energy comes from burning hydrocarbons and carbohydrates. The average artificial power consumption is about 1500W per capita.
All warmblooded animals run at about 2 W/kg by oxidising hydrocarbons and carbohydrates. Humans produce about 150W per capita , and farm animals about 2.5 times that amount per human.
Logged
helping to stem the tide of ignorance
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tags:
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...