The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. If Jupiter were 5 times larger and became a star, how bright would it be?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

If Jupiter were 5 times larger and became a star, how bright would it be?

  • 1 Replies
  • 2888 Views
  • 4 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline chris (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 8061
  • Activity:
    1.5%
  • Thanked: 306 times
  • The Naked Scientist
    • The Naked Scientists
If Jupiter were 5 times larger and became a star, how bright would it be?
« on: 01/06/2017 09:35:25 »
Donald asks:

Jupiter could become a radiating star if it becomes six to ten times larger. How bright would it be?  Could it be seen during the day? At night, could we read by it? What wavelength of light? How many lumens? Can you speculate on nocturnal species, global warming, changes in civilization.

What do you think?
Logged
I never forget a face, but in your case I'll make an exception - Groucho Marx - https://www.thenakedscientists.com/
 



Offline evan_au

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 11035
  • Activity:
    9%
  • Thanked: 1486 times
Re: If Jupiter were 5 times larger and became a star, how bright would it be?
« Reply #1 on: 01/06/2017 13:23:52 »
Compare Proxima Centauri, the nearest star to Earth:
- Proxima is a red dwarf star, 1/8 the mass of the Sun, and puts out 0.005% of the visible light of the Sun (it is much cooler than the Sun, and puts out almost all of its energy at invisible infra-red wavelengths, plus frequent flares that release lots of X-rays).
- If Proxima Centauri were as far away as the Sun-Earth distance, we would see it as a small patch of dim red in the sky, 1/7 the diameter of the Sun, and 1/50 the area.
- Jupiter is 1/1050 the mass of the Sun, so you would need to make it more than 100 times the mass to match Proxima Centauri
- A "sub-brown dwarf" like a 10x Jupiter would not sustain any hydrogen fusion, and would mainly be releasing heat from its original gravitational collapse. If it were as old as our Solar System, it would not put out any visible light from thermal sources (it could still sustain things like lightning and auroras). You would not see it in daylight (when the Sun is out) or at night (when the Moon is out).
- For sizes larger than 13xJupiter, some fusion would occur, but the rate of hydrogen fusion in stars increases as something like the cube of the mass. So it needs to be a lot larger than this to allow you to read by its light.

See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_dwarf
Logged
 
The following users thanked this post: chiralSPO



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: jupiter  / star  / brightness  / luminosity 
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.969 seconds with 30 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.