[talanum1 (OP)]

  Particles are made of Riemann Spheres.

  I can explain how particles start to exist. For a meson: all of space copies twelve times and contracts into superimposed Riemann Spheres: three made of events and three of negative events for the particle and the antiparticle. Then the two sets of six Riemann Spheres separate after events and negative events get swapped to encode: electric charge, mass, weak isospin and color charge.

[Kryptid]

all of space copies twelve times

What does that even mean?

negative events

What is a "negative event"?

[talanum1 (OP)]

What does that even mean?

Spacetime is made of numbers: it can copy. All of spacetime copies and the point at infinity copies onto the Riemann Spheres's north pole.

What is a "negative event"?

A left out point in spacetime. It is surrounded by positive events. This allows one to choose the origin of your coordinate system anywhere.

[puppypower]

One observation that I noticed about (sub) particles is connected to  particle accelerator data. If we start with a proton, for example, and smash it in a particle accelerator, we can release the quarks or sub particles, from which the proton is composed.

My observation has to do with time scale. A proton, before the accelerator experiment, is composed of the same quarks, which are integrated. They entire system of proton and quarks will   last for billions of years if left alone. The proton is designed to last as long as the universe. The sub particles that make up the proton, once they are released, they only last for an instant. Why the drastic change in the life expectancy of the quarks?

In most of nature, pick any object, from a tree, a rock, a planet or a star, the overall object  will always last less time than its constituent parts; protons and electrons. The question is why do the sub particles of protons last less time than the proton? What has the experiment done, to reverse a trend, that is common in all the rest of nature?

My theory has to do with time dilation. The protons and electrons, were created very early in the universe, when space-time was more contracted and the impact of gravity and GR was very powerful. The particle accelerators, do their thing in the future of this same universe, when space time is far more expanded.

The long life of the initial integrated proton appears to behave like it had been internally time dilated back when created. The sub particles still last the same amount of time, as observed in the lab, but they appear to last longer in our reference because of time dilation. The affect is like looking at an event near a black hole or the moving twin in the twin paradox. Both appear to linger longer.

Once we open up the proton, and expose the sub particles to our expanded space-time reference, the sub particles change reference and decay very quickly; the twin left on earth. The decay rate of the quark is universal, or is the same in terms of a normalized reference. It will appear faster or slower based on exposure reference.

Why we are getting a reversal in terms of the life expectancy of the parts, versus whole, that does not play out in the rest of nature? I have explained this before based on phase diagrams as a function of energy and extreme gravitational pressures. If we extracted the quarks of a proton at extreme pressure, where time runs very slow, they would last longer in our reference. This reference affect makes the proton behave like the rest of nature in terms of its whole and parts.   In the lab, the quarks are the last thing standing. The proton ends first.

[Kryptid]

Spacetime is made of numbers: it can copy.

Copies what?

A left out point in spacetime.

What does it mean for a point to be "left out" of space-time?

[Bobolink]

One observation that I noticed about (sub) particles is connected to  particle accelerator data. If we start with a proton, for example, and smash it in a particle accelerator, we can release the quarks or sub particles, from which the proton is composed.

Your observation is incorrect, that is not what is happening.

[talanum1 (OP)]

Copies what?

It can copy like the contents of a register in a computer.

What does it mean for a point to be "left out" of space-time?

A point is "left out of spacetime" if the position where there should (logically) have been a positive event is unoccupied by a spacetime event.

[acsinuk]

 Riemann Spheres have a volume and particles are made of electric charges spun by the magnoflux spin effect. The 3 dimensions of the sphere are composed of amp current in x direction linked to flux in y direction, a magnetically spinning area x,y and separately a voltage force in the z direction

[Bored chemist]

Particles: what they are Made of, can you comment?
It seems acsinuk can comment, but not in a way that makes sense.

This

Riemann Spheres have a volume and particles are made of electric charges spun by the magnoflux spin effect. The 3 dimensions of the sphere are composed of amp current in x direction linked to flux in y direction, a magnetically spinning area x,y and separately a voltage force in the z direction

is word salad.

[talanum1 (OP)]

made of electric charges spun

I can make the charge spinning close to the xz-plane (orbiting) but not flowing along the x axis. This would give rise to a magnetic moment.