The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Geology, Palaeontology & Archaeology
  4. Diamonds are well hard aren't they?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Diamonds are well hard aren't they?

  • 4 Replies
  • 3016 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline podcastmaker (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 12
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Diamonds are well hard aren't they?
« on: 15/10/2020 09:48:44 »
Diamonds are well hard aren't they ?
« Last Edit: 16/10/2020 08:43:34 by chris »
Logged
 



Offline evan_au

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 11035
  • Activity:
    9%
  • Thanked: 1486 times
Re: Diamonds are well hard aren't they?
« Reply #1 on: 15/10/2020 10:15:49 »
Yes.

When Moh developed his hardness scale for rocks, he used similar proportions between successive steps of his scale.
- But he had nothing in hardness between carborundum (9 on his scale) and diamond, so he gave diamond the next number (10).
- In fact, diamond is far harder than carborundum, and deserves a hardness number somewhere around 20.

See graph at: https://geology.com/minerals/mohs-hardness-scale.shtml
Logged
 

Offline chris

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 8061
  • Activity:
    1.5%
  • Thanked: 306 times
  • The Naked Scientist
    • The Naked Scientists
Re: Diamonds are well hard aren't they?
« Reply #2 on: 16/10/2020 08:43:24 »
Quote from: evan_au on 15/10/2020 10:15:49
diamond is far harder than carborundum, and deserves a hardness number somewhere around 20.

Wow; that blew my mind. I had no idea it was such a big jump...
Logged
I never forget a face, but in your case I'll make an exception - Groucho Marx - https://www.thenakedscientists.com/
 

Offline adamsmitt

  • First timers
  • *
  • 4
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Forum Newbie
Re: Diamonds are well hard aren't they?
« Reply #3 on: 16/10/2020 12:04:33 »
Hi, I also heard that they are super strong but they have one drawback they are fragile as I know.
Logged
 

Offline pensador

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 415
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 10 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Diamonds are well hard aren't they?
« Reply #4 on: 17/10/2020 19:51:49 »
Quote from: adamsmitt on 16/10/2020 12:04:33
Hi, I also heard that they are super strong but they have one drawback they are fragile as I know.
Not unless they are fakes
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.339 seconds with 39 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.