The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. Is a correction to the EM field energy formula needed?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Is a correction to the EM field energy formula needed?

  • 1 Replies
  • 2182 Views
  • 2 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Sergio_Prats (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 12
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
Is a correction to the EM field energy formula needed?
« on: 20/09/2017 06:28:36 »
I would like to propose a correction to the energy of the electromagnetic field when there are particles with a discrete charge instead of a continuous charge distribution ρ(r). Each particle may be punctual or extended over the space, having a density of charge ρn(r), and density of current Jn(n)

While the standard formula for field density of energy is: u' = (ε/2)E2 + (μ/2)H2, my correction subtracts a summation with the field energies that all these particles would have if they were isolated in the space, with this term the field density of energy would become:

    u = (ε/2)E2 + (μ/2)H2 - (ε/2) ∑En2 -  (μ/2)∑Hn2

Where En and Hn are the fields that each particle generates.

A similar correction should be done for the Poynting vector S.

The motivation of this correction term comes from the fact that the charge in a particle does not interact on itself, for example, the electron in the Hydrogen atom does create an electric field but it does not cause any potential to include in its own Hamiltonian (with is only affected by the proton's central potential): a charged particle creates an electromagnetic field but it is not affected by it, it is only affected by the field created by others.

At present the calculations I have done are limited to two radial wavefunctions for the Hydrogen atom (that means, a system with only two particles), however this is enough to see that the classical expression does not satisfy that the difference of potential energy between both levels should be the same that the difference of energy in the field while when using my correction it is satisfied.

I have created a paper in which I explain this ideas with more detail, it's here:

https://www.slideshare.net/SergioPL81/field-energy-with-discrete-charges [nofollow]

Any contribution or criticism to this idea will be welcome.

Sergio Prats
« Last Edit: 21/09/2017 10:18:34 by Sergio_Prats »
Logged
 



Offline chris

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 8061
  • Activity:
    1.5%
  • Thanked: 305 times
  • The Naked Scientist
    • The Naked Scientists
Re: Correction to the field energy formula in presence of discrete particles
« Reply #1 on: 20/09/2017 22:37:21 »
Please change the title of this thread to phrase it as a question; posts that do not follow this format will be removed within the next 24h.

Thanks
Logged
I never forget a face, but in your case I'll make an exception - Groucho Marx - https://www.thenakedscientists.com/
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: electromagnetism  / field energy 
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.227 seconds with 29 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.