The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. A new theory for gravitation by me (sorry for ?mark)?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

A new theory for gravitation by me (sorry for ?mark)?

  • 6 Replies
  • 1911 Views
  • 2 Tags

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Dhruv (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 5
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
A new theory for gravitation by me (sorry for ?mark)?
« on: 19/02/2021 13:15:59 »
So, I was studying gravity for some time and at night I thought about this theory.

Originally sir Isaac newton said,
"Every object attract every other object"
I think, every atom in the universe has some kind of magnetic quality in it which creates a magnetic field which when comes into another magnetic field the both atoms get attracted, That's my theory of attraction.

I am not fully sure about atoms cause it even could be the ions having the magnetic quality.

Now, as said before I got idea of this theory in night so I ain't no sure if it's already taken or not.

I would really be glad if you could correct me if suggest your suggestions.

Thanks

Edit: I didn't meant to say that gravity is magnetism.
I mean every atom would have protons and electrons
And so either one of them would be more
Then the other electrons with the other being more will get attracted to the atom.

And you all know that Earth has a core which consists of molten metal.

So earths core attracts every other atoms creating a radius of attraction around it which we call gravitation.

Cause we don't get attracted to Earth, we get attracted to the core of Earth.

Hence,we could say that the core of Earth is the reason why gravity occurs at the first place.

« Last Edit: 20/02/2021 07:45:13 by Dhruv »
Logged
 



Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    11%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: A new theory for gravitation by me (sorry for ?mark)?
« Reply #1 on: 19/02/2021 14:19:04 »
An iron nail is attracted by a magnet. A glass of water is not.
But they are both attracted by gravity.
So we know that gravity is not magnetism.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline puppypower

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1652
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 125 times
Re: A new theory for gravitation by me (sorry for ?mark)?
« Reply #2 on: 19/02/2021 14:34:38 »
Your theory is similar to the early modern theories of gravity. The electromagnetic force; EM force, when it lowers potential, gives off energy quanta as photons. The early modern theory of gravity implied that gravity, as an attractive force, should also give off energy quanta like the EM force. These were termed, gravitons, at the start of the investigation. However, the gravitons were never found. This suggested the gravity  was a force but not like the rest.

If you look at a forming star, as gravity attracts the matter for the star, a rotation will usually begin. This appears to be an example of Newton's action and reaction. The lowering of gravitational potential, which should be exothermic, graviton or not, is causing an action and reaction that increases kinetic energy  elsewhere. There is no graviton to mediate, but there is still an energy action and reaction, connected to related angular momentum and rotation. A rotating galaxy is doing this because its internal gravity is lowering potential and giving off energy,

If you look at General Relativity; GR, mass, via gravity will contract and curve space-time. This curving action due to GR, suggests that the curvature of space-time and the curvature of the induced angular momentum are connected. One may theorize that the spin of electron and even sub atomic particles may all be connected to gravity, which is why they rarely stop. They are being constantly fed energy.
« Last Edit: 19/02/2021 14:38:51 by puppypower »
Logged
 

Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 8082
  • Activity:
    1.5%
  • Thanked: 514 times
Re: A new theory for gravitation by me (sorry for ?mark)?
« Reply #3 on: 19/02/2021 16:42:06 »
Light is attracted to gravitational fields (gravitational lensing) but not to magnetic fields.

Quote from: puppypower on 19/02/2021 14:34:38
However, the gravitons were never found. This suggested the gravity  was a force but not like the rest.

Individual gravitons are absurdly difficult to detect.
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    11%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: A new theory for gravitation by me (sorry for ?mark)?
« Reply #4 on: 19/02/2021 20:13:59 »
Quote from: puppypower on 19/02/2021 14:34:38
If you look at a forming star, as gravity attracts the matter for the star, a rotation will usually begin.
The rotation was already there.
That's why we say that angular momentum is a conserved quantity.

Quote from: puppypower on 19/02/2021 14:34:38
This appears to be an example of Newton's action and reaction.
Yes and no.
Every physical process is an example of Newton's law. It's a universal law; it's can't "not apply".
But, while, the effects of the law make a difference locally, they don't alter the overall outcome much.

Quote from: puppypower on 19/02/2021 14:34:38
The lowering of gravitational potential, which should be exothermic,
It is observably  so.
Quote from: puppypower on 19/02/2021 14:34:38
There is no graviton to mediate
Just saying that doesn't make it true.

Quote from: puppypower on 19/02/2021 14:34:38
here is still an energy action and reaction, connected to related angular momentum and rotation. A rotating galaxy is doing this because its internal gravity is lowering potential and giving off energy,
That seems to be word salad.
Quote from: puppypower on 19/02/2021 14:34:38
This curving action due to GR, suggests that the curvature of space-time and the curvature of the induced angular momentum are connected.
No, it doesn't.

Quote from: puppypower on 19/02/2021 14:34:38
One may theorize that the spin of electron and even sub atomic particles may all be connected to gravity, which is why they rarely stop. They are being constantly fed energy.
Hogwash.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



Offline Dhruv (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 5
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: A new theory for gravitation by me (sorry for ?mark)?
« Reply #5 on: 20/02/2021 07:49:59 »
Everyone please read my edited version of the theory in order to get a clear understanding of what I actually meant.
:)
Logged
 

Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 8082
  • Activity:
    1.5%
  • Thanked: 514 times
Re: A new theory for gravitation by me (sorry for ?mark)?
« Reply #6 on: 21/02/2021 02:03:40 »
Quote from: Dhruv on 20/02/2021 07:49:59
Everyone please read my edited version of the theory in order to get a clear understanding of what I actually meant.

What I said still holds. Light is attracted by gravity, but not by magnetism. So your edited idea still doesn't work.

Quote from: Dhruv on 19/02/2021 13:15:59
Hence,we could say that the core of Earth is the reason why gravity occurs at the first place.

The Cavendish experiment was able to measure the gravitational attraction between lead spheres, so no kind of molten core is needed for gravity to exist: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cavendish_experiment
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: gravitation  / isaac newton 
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.345 seconds with 41 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.