[Bored chemist]

the socalled aether theory ..

Why are you so keen on old ideas that have been shown not to work?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luminiferous_aether#Problems

if SM is dead

It isn't dead. It's just that you haven't understood it.

I said to BC I will not respond

If you do not respond to the problems I raise withy your ideas then it will look as if you do not know the answers.

[evan_au]

if the water is magnetized i.e. the rearangement of the moleculs as crystal latice was more symmetric thus the plants were recognizing it as useful

Plants take up liquid water from the soil.
- Liquid water does not have a stable crystal structure.
- In the soil, the structure of water is strongly affected by the minerals in the soil through which the water is seeping.

If you are talking about a stable crystal lattice, you are talking about ice, and plants don't take up ice (in fact, many plant  species are damaged by exposure to ice).

[Kryptid]

Since this has clearly moved into the realm of pseudoscience, I have moved this thread to "New Theories".

@Kryptid probably You didnt check the links in the footnotes

Your first link was written in Russian. Since I can't read Russian, I can't comment on it. I didn't see anything in your second link about magnetized water. Your third link is an anecdotal account about magnets aging wine.

You have nice debate in the researchgate link

What ResearchGate link?

so magnetized water works as expected

Non-sequitur.

I'll accept that You will not be able to grasp Masaru Emoto bioresonance approach [1]

It's not hard to grasp the concept. What is needed isn't an understanding of it, what is needed is good-quality, peer-reviewed evidence that it is correct. That link you provided is, again, in Russian. I don't speak Russian. Also, has anyone ever replicated Emoto's experiments and gotten the same results in a tightly-controlled environment? If not, then that leaves a lot wanting in terms of scientific evidence.

but trying to "debunk" magnetic water because there are not enough studies is the same prejudice that rolled on with CBD earlier two decades ago, tho as we can see someone is still blocking or postponing its public pedestal ...

Proper scientific studies are a vital part of deducing whether a phenomenon really exists or not. It's too easy for improperly controlled experiments to lead to false conclusions.

for SM what to say, saying You are driving car like that is pointing that only effect from that is the license in your pocket, but Please open new thread and we will examine how long such license will stay in your pocket, sometimes its really pointless to argue about implanted scientific trends which time long ago expired but because scientific elitism or funding purposes are still kept in artificially induced coma ...

The Standard Model was first brought up in this thread by you, not me. As long as you continue to talk about it, I will continue to address it. If you want it to be confined to a different thread, then feel free to make the thread yourself.

if SM is dead

It isn't.

the current quantum mechanical model which postulates "flows of electrons" should be reexamined

No need. We know from experiments that it works.

in my view through radiant energy the socalled aether theory

Aether was falsified a long time ago. At least, the original concept of the aether was.

will open huge room for new at least calibration of the spectrometers

Why do spectrometers need to be calibrated any more than they already are?

still I think the particle physics is fundamentally wrong if there is no super symmetry

Supersymmetry was never a requirement for contemporary particle physics. It was a new theory that, so far, hasn't exactly bore much fruit.

like that seeing the difference between artificial and natural CBD

Again, if there was a difference, we would have figured it out a long time ago. Spectrometers would have picked it up.

but as I said we are light years from such even theoretical reasoning what about measuring instruments that will grasp bioresonce

If that's the case, then why should we even assume that bioresonance has any truth to it?

SM pseudoscience

The Standard Model isn't pseudoscience.

I know just that the photonicsspectra article points that the current physics understanding is not explaining  eg. how the vibration of light i.e. particular frequency can activate proteins 

Can you please quote the part of the article that says that?

but also cant explain many other things eg.Blackbody Radiation

Says who?

also the Photoelectric Effect (Emission of electrons from metal surfaces when light shines) and Emission Spectra too (Emission of light from electronically excited gas atoms)

Modern physics deals with these issues pretty easily, actually. Quantum physics is a critical aspect of those things.

for once think out of the box ...

If your definition of "thinking outside the box" requires me to ignore well-established, scientific evidence, then I'll stay inside the box.

[Bored chemist]

cant explain many other things eg.Blackbody Radiation (Energy objects emit when they are heated) also the Photoelectric Effect (Emission of electrons from metal surfaces when light shines) and Emission Spectra too (Emission of light from electronically excited gas atoms) also there is the wave-particle paradox etc. etc.

The current models in physics, particularly QM, are based on an understanding of BBR, the photoelectric effect etc.
Your assertion is nonsense.

[Osogovo (OP)]

@Kryptid look again in the first footnote where in the macedonian forum post is in plain linked the reasearchgate debate, still this is not prime thread for debating that digression... now again we are too offtopic but probably this was good reason so this thread would be removed from the Covid-19 subforum I wonder why [1]

anyway here is another good addition to the ontopic natural CBD need ... check the quoted study ...

[Kryptid]

You're the one who brought up the Standard Model. You're the one who brought up bioresonance. You're the one who claimed that natural and synthetic molecules are somehow different from each other. If you didn't want us to talk about those things, you shouldn't have mentioned them. Again, if you cease to mention them, then I will stop talking about them as well.

There is nothing keeping you from making your own threads on those topics.

Even if you hadn't mentioned any of those things, I would argue that this thread still belongs in New Theories because claiming that CBD is a sensible alternative to vaccination against COVID-19 definitely sounds like a pseudoscience claim on par with vitamin mega-dosing.

[Osogovo (OP)]

 ... LITTLE UPDATE HEMP RULZ ...

<<<LINK REMOVED>>>

[Colin2B]

you need to have discussions on this site and not just provide links to discussion you are having on other sites. Note that posting material you have already posted on other sites is against the rules and can lead to a withdrawal of your posting rights.

[AdamBarnes]

In fact, I’m also kind of a person whom is necessary to have a normal and well-balanced rest, so I respect your decision to improve it too. Therefore, in order to help you, I can recommend you to try this for spamlinkbig.con that will help to get rid of constant anxiety and tiredness. I sincerely hope that you will try to use it in the right way for yourself!