0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
i think it must have been a constant universe that LOOKS like it inflated from a point for any observer within the universe... each observer point probably has a different point of seeming 'big bang' origin ... although all of us here on earth might find it difficult to separate the different points of origin out thanks to the huge scale......doesn't the uncertainty principle blow out the idea of absolute nothing? and conservation of energy blow out 'something' from 'nothing'...
As far as I am concerned the Big Bang has been firmly established. Looks like Father Georges Lemaître was right after all! LOL []
...doesn't the uncertainty principle blow out the idea of absolute nothing? and conservation of energy blow out 'something' from 'nothing'...
Quote from: CreativeEnergy on 15/08/2010 20:00:24As far as I am concerned the Big Bang has been firmly established. Looks like Father Georges Lemaître was right after all! LOL []Was Father Georges Lemaître Right?We don't know. Why not simply admit that we do not know if the universe is finite or infinite?snips..Let's celebrate new information that is being revealed today and stop arguing about information that none of have yet.
Say a diesel engine requires 10 liters of water ......
I am of the inclination that there is not ONE BIG BANG, from the size of a proton to expand to this whole visible universe with some 15 billion galaxies, not to mention trillions of stars, and quadrillions of planets. Not to show disrespect, but the author of one big bang is a priest-scientist…that Big Bang was patterned after the creation of the Bible.I feel it is more reasonable that several big bangs, of smaller sizes, occurred,, these array of billions of galaxies indicates that such could be the many big bangs within visible universe. That the galaxies are the make up of the universe, like falling rain, not one raindrop but millions of raindrops. Then, it is more plausible that the origin of these galaxies could be the size of proton, each galaxy. Why are there billions of galaxies, giants in their own individual sizes, carrying billions of satellite stars, the galaxies, comparable in size from one another, distributed/spread on the relative distance from one another or cluster.
Hi Nick,Where do I find your hypothesis?Bengt
However, it is interesting that in proper Qabbalism (not that deranged nonsense proselytised by such as Madonna) Ein Soph Aur equates rather nicely to quantum foam. It is the "Great Nothingness" from which everything ultimately emerges.